Dataset Information

The search for the ideal fixation of palatal fractures: innovative experience with a mini-locking plate.

ABSTRACT: Fractures of the palate have defied conventional management, such that malrotation and disinclination of the palatal shelves occur in a significant number of patients after repair. The fractured palatal shelves of eight patients were first prealigned. To do so, one or more 205-mm ratchet clamps and two intermaxillary fixation (IMF) posts were used. Rigid fixation was then achieved by applying a 2.0-mm mini-locking titanium plate (across the palatal vault) and by applying an adaptation miniplate across the fracture line as it exited the anterior surface of the maxilla. Screws were passed directly through the mucoperiosteum, to engage the palatal shelves and to lock the locking plate into position. Lacerations in the mucoperiosteum were neither used to aid fixation nor used as portals for dissection; incisions and mucoperiosteal flaps in the palatal vault were avoided. Adjuncts, such as intraoral splints, have not been used in cases to date, and early mobilization was allowed. Reconstitution of the craniomaxillofacial buttresses was added in patients with more extensive maxillary injury. The palatal appliance and screws remained rigidly in position in the roof of the mouth, much like an external fixator, until their removal 8 to 12 weeks after the repair. No patient suffered erosion of the mucoperiosteum or other major morbidity, other than a transient fistula of the soft palate. The palatoalveolar segments remained in proper realignment and inclination, and pretraumatic occlusal patterns and the width and depth of the lower face appear to have been restored with one exception. The latter suffered a subtle posterolateral open bite that was corrected orthodontically. Prealignment of fractured palatal shelves with one or more large ratchet clamps and two IMF posts provides several points of forced reduction of the palatal shelves, along the dental arch. In addition, stabilization with mini-locking plate(s) in the palatal vault and an adaptation plate across the fracture line, as it exits the maxilla, appear to have merit, based on this preliminary report (n = 8). Outcomes seen on computed tomography and clinical examination during this 3-year experience have been favorable.

SUBMITTER: Pollock RA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3052730 | biostudies-other | 2008 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:The use of low-profile dorsal and volar locking plates for distal radial fracture surgery has improved results and lowered the complication rate compared with older plate designs. The purpose of the present randomized controlled trial was to compare patient-reported outcomes as well as radiographic and functional results between patients who underwent stabilization with a volar locking plate or a dorsal locking nail-plate for the treatment of dorsally displaced unstable extra-articular distal radial fractures. One hundred and twenty patients ≥55 years of age were randomized to surgery with either a volar locking plate or a dorsal locking nail-plate and were assessed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. The primary outcome was the abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score. Secondary outcomes were the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) index and visual analog scale (VAS), range of motion, grip strength, radiographic measurements, and complication rate. The median age was 66 years (range, 55 to 88 years). The rate of follow-up was 97%. There was no clinically important difference between the groups at any point during follow-up. Patients in the volar locking plate group had better mean QuickDASH scores at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year. However, the differences were small (5.8 vs. 11.3 points at 1 year; mean difference, -5.5 points [95% confidence interval (CI), -9.9 to 1.2]; p = 0.014), which is lower than any proposed minimum clinically important difference (MCID). The difference in PRWE scores was also lower than the MCID (1.0 vs. 3.5 at 1 year; mean difference, -2.5 [95% CI, -4.4 to 0.6]; p = 0.012). The dorsal locking nail-plate group had slightly better restoration of volar tilt (p = 0.011). EQ-5D index, EQ-5D VAS, range of motion, grip strength, and complication rates were similar. We found no clinically relevant difference between the volar locking plate and dorsal locking nail-plate groups after 1 year or in the time period up to 1 year. A dorsal locking nail-plate can therefore be an alternative method for the treatment of these unstable fractures or in cases in which a dorsal approach is preferable over a volar approach. Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Project description:PurposeThe treatment of distal femur fractures with extensive metaphyseal comminution is frequently complicated by high rates of nonunion and varus collapse. Dual plating with lateral and medial locking plates for these types of fractures has shown promising results in the recent literature. We hypothesize that dual plating of comminuted distal femur fractures leads to higher union rates and lower revision rates compared to an isolated lateral locking plate.MethodsA retrospective medical chart review between January 2015 and December 2017 was conducted. Inclusion criteria included patients 18 years of age and older who sustained a complex distal femur fracture (AO/OTA 33-C2/33-C3 or periprosthetic fracture with significant metaphyseal comminution) and at least 6 months of follow up. Patients with simple fracture patterns, alternative fixation methods, and inadequate follow up were excluded. All patients in the single plating group were treated with a lateral distal femoral locking plate using a lateral approach. In the patients treated with dual plating, an extensile parapatellar approach was utilized for fracture reduction and placement of an adjunctive medial plate. Demographic information, fracture types, injury severity score (ISS), medical comorbidities, type of surgical fixation, union rates, complications, knee range of motion, time to follow up, and need for revision surgery were extrapolated from the medical charts for analysis.ResultsTwenty-one patients were included in the study. Thirteen patients underwent single plate fixation and 8 underwent dual plate fixation. There were no significant differences in demographics, number of co-morbidities, fracture classification, or ISS between single and dual plate groups (p > 0.05 for all). There was a statistically significant difference in union rates between the single plate group (6 nonunions, 4 unions, and 3 delayed unions) and the dual plate group, with no nonunions or delayed unions (p = 0.0049). Although not statistically significant, 4 patients treated with single plating underwent revision ORIF, compared to none in the dual plating group (p = 0.13). There were no significant differences in time to follow up, time to full weight bearing, or infection rates (p > 0.1 for all).ConclusionBased on these results, the medial and lateral locked plating technique demonstrates a higher union rate, with possible lower rates of revision surgery, compared to a single lateral plate in highly comminuted distal femur fractures.Level of evidenceLevel 3. Retrospective Cohort Study.

Dataset Information

The search for the ideal fixation of palatal fractures: innovative experience with a mini-locking plate.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets