Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Family- and population-based designs identify different rare causal variants.

ABSTRACT: Both family- and population-based samples are used to identify genetic variants associated with phenotypes. Each strategy has demonstrated advantages, but their ability to identify rare variants and genes containing rare variants is unclear. To compare these two study designs in the identification of rare causal variants, we applied various methods to the population- and family-based data simulated by the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 with knowledge of the simulated model. Our results suggest that different variants can be identified by different study designs. Family-based and population-based study designs can be complementary in the identification of rare causal variants and should be considered in future studies.

SUBMITTER: Zhang X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3287872 | biostudies-other | 2011 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Publications

Family- and population-based designs identify different rare causal variants.

Zhang Xue X He Hua H Ding Lili L Baye Tesfaye M TM Kurowski Brad G BG Martin Lisa J LJ

BMC proceedings 20111129

Both family- and population-based samples are used to identify genetic variants associated with phenotypes. Each strategy has demonstrated advantages, but their ability to identify rare variants and genes containing rare variants is unclear. To compare these two study designs in the identification of rare causal variants, we applied various methods to the population- and family-based data simulated by the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 with knowledge of the simulated model. Our results suggest tha ...[more]

PMID: 22373077

Similar Datasets

Identifying rare variant associations in population-based and family-based designs.

Project description:For almost all complex traits studied in humans, the identified genetic variants discovered to date have accounted for only a small portion of the estimated trait heritability. Consequently, several methods have been developed to identify rare single-nucleotide variants associated with complex traits for population-based designs. Because rare disease variants tend to be enriched in families containing multiple affected individuals, family-based designs can play an important role in the identification of rare causal variants. In this study, we utilize Genetic Analysis Workshop 18 simulated data to examine the performance of some existing rare variant identification methods for unrelated individuals, including our recent method (rPLS). The simulated data is used to investigate whether there is an advantage to using family data compared to case-control data. The results indicate that population-based methods suffer from power loss, especially when the sample size is small. The family-based method employed in this paper results in higher power but fails to control type I error. Our study also highlights the importance of the phenotype choice, which can affect the power of detecting causal genes substantially.

| S-EPMC4143803 | biostudies-literature

A novel rare variants association test for binary traits in family-based designs via copulas.

Project description:With the cost-effectiveness technology in whole-genome sequencing, more sophisticated statistical methods for testing genetic association with both rare and common variants are being investigated to identify the genetic variation between individuals. Several methods which group variants, also called gene-based approaches, are developed. For instance, advanced extensions of the sequence kernel association test, which is a widely used variant-set test, have been proposed for unrelated samples and extended for family data. Family data have been shown to be powerful when analyzing rare variants. However, most of such methods capture familial relatedness using a random effect component within the generalized linear mixed model framework. Therefore, there is a need to develop unified and flexible methods to study the association between a set of genetic variants and a trait, especially for a binary outcome. Copulas are multivariate distribution functions with uniform margins on the [0,1] interval and they provide suitable models to capture familial dependence structure. In this work, we propose a flexible family-based association test for both rare and common variants in the presence of binary traits. The method, termed novel rare variant association test (NRVAT), uses a marginal logistic model and a Gaussian Copula. The latter is employed to model the dependence between relatives. An analytic score-type test is derived. Through simulations, we show that our method can achieve greater power than existing approaches. The proposed model is applied to investigate the association between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in a family-based cohort consisting of 17 extended families from Eastern Quebec.

| S-EPMC10683345 | biostudies-literature

Power of family-based association designs to detect rare variants in large pedigrees using imputed genotypes.

Project description:Recently, the "Common Disease-Multiple Rare Variants" hypothesis has received much attention, especially with current availability of next-generation sequencing. Family-based designs are well suited for discovery of rare variants, with large and carefully selected pedigrees enriching for multiple copies of such variants. However, sequencing a large number of samples is still prohibitive. Here, we evaluate a cost-effective strategy (pseudosequencing) to detect association with rare variants in large pedigrees. This strategy consists of sequencing a small subset of subjects, genotyping the remaining sampled subjects on a set of sparse markers, and imputing the untyped markers in the remaining subjects conditional on the sequenced subjects and pedigree information. We used a recent pedigree imputation method (GIGI), which is able to efficiently handle large pedigrees and accurately impute rare variants. We used burden and kernel association tests, famWS and famSKAT, which both account for family relationships and heterogeneity of allelic effect for famSKAT only. We simulated pedigree sequence data and compared the power of association tests for pseudosequence data, a subset of sequence data used for imputation, and all subjects sequenced. We also compared, within the pseudosequence data, the power of association test using best-guess genotypes and allelic dosages. Our results show that the pseudosequencing strategy considerably improves the power to detect association with rare variants. They also show that the use of allelic dosages results in much higher power than use of best-guess genotypes in these family-based data. Moreover, famSKAT shows greater power than famWS in most of scenarios we considered.

| S-EPMC3959172 | biostudies-literature

Family-based tests applied to extended pedigrees identify rare variants related to hypertension.

Project description:The application of family-based tests to whole-genome sequenced data provides a new window on the role of rare variant alleles in the etiology of disease. By applying family-based tests to these data, we can now identify rare variants associated with disease. Approaches for common variants, by contrast, require large sample sizes for power, and are powerless when faced with rare variants. When we tested Yip et al's 2011 family-based association tests for rare variants on pedigrees from the Genetic Analysis Workshop 18, we found that weighted collapsing methods generally have more power than unweighted methods, but are more prone to type I errors. We then evaluated a sliding window modification of the weighted family-based association tests for rare variants method. Although this modification inflates the rate of false positives, it significantly increases the power of family-based association tests for rare variants to identify causal rare variants.

| S-EPMC4143699 | biostudies-literature

Utilising family-based designs for detecting rare variant disease associations.

Project description:Rare genetic variants are thought to be important components in the causality of many diseases but discovering these associations is challenging. We demonstrate how best to use family-based designs to improve the power to detect rare variant disease associations. We show that using genetic data from enriched families (those pedigrees with greater than one affected member) increases the power and sensitivity of existing case-control rare variant tests. However, we show that transmission- (or within-family-) based tests do not benefit from this enrichment. This means that, in studies where a limited amount of genotyping is available, choosing a single case from each of many pedigrees has greater power than selecting multiple cases from fewer pedigrees. Finally, we show how a pseudo-case-control design allows a greater range of statistical tests to be applied to family data.

| S-EPMC4292528 | biostudies-literature

Using extreme phenotype sampling to identify the rare causal variants of quantitative traits in association studies.

Project description:Variants identified in recent genome-wide association studies based on the common-disease common-variant hypothesis are far from fully explaining the hereditability of complex traits. Rare variants may, in part, explain some of the missing hereditability. Here, we explored the advantage of the extreme phenotype sampling in rare-variant analysis and refined this design framework for future large-scale association studies on quantitative traits. We first proposed a power calculation approach for a likelihood-based analysis method. We then used this approach to demonstrate the potential advantages of extreme phenotype sampling for rare variants. Next, we discussed how this design can influence future sequencing-based association studies from a cost-efficiency (with the phenotyping cost included) perspective. Moreover, we discussed the potential of a two-stage design with the extreme sample as the first stage and the remaining nonextreme subjects as the second stage. We demonstrated that this two-stage design is a cost-efficient alternative to the one-stage cross-sectional design or traditional two-stage design. We then discussed the analysis strategies for this extreme two-stage design and proposed a corresponding design optimization procedure. To address many practical concerns, for example measurement error or phenotypic heterogeneity at the very extremes, we examined an approach in which individuals with very extreme phenotypes are discarded. We demonstrated that even with a substantial proportion of these extreme individuals discarded, an extreme-based sampling can still be more efficient. Finally, we expanded the current analysis and design framework to accommodate the CMC approach where multiple rare-variants in the same gene region are analyzed jointly.

| S-EPMC4238184 | biostudies-literature

Array-based resequencing of human mitochondrial disease patient samples to identify rare DNA variants

Project description:This is a custom Affymetrix resequencing array for DNA sequencing of the entire coding region and exon-splice sites of 39 human genes (452 exons; 106,337 bases). These nuclear genes encode proteins localized to mitochondria and include known disease genes (i.e. POLG, C10orf2) and new candidate genes for mtDNA maintenance disorders. We sequenced 27 patient (P) and 13 control (C) samples using this array.

2011-08-26 | E-MTAB-346 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Integrative analysis of functional genomic annotations and sequencing data to identify rare causal variants via hierarchical modeling.

Project description:Identifying the small number of rare causal variants contributing to disease has been a major focus of investigation in recent years, but represents a formidable statistical challenge due to the rare frequencies with which these variants are observed. In this commentary we draw attention to a formal statistical framework, namely hierarchical modeling, to combine functional genomic annotations with sequencing data with the objective of enhancing our ability to identify rare causal variants. Using simulations we show that in all configurations studied, the hierarchical modeling approach has superior discriminatory ability compared to a recently proposed aggregate measure of deleteriousness, the Combined Annotation-Dependent Depletion (CADD) score, supporting our premise that aggregate functional genomic measures can more accurately identify causal variants when used in conjunction with sequencing data through a hierarchical modeling approach.

| S-EPMC4424902 | biostudies-literature

Family-based association tests for rare variants with censored traits.

Project description:We propose a set of family-based burden and kernel tests for censored traits (FamBAC and FamKAC). Here, censored traits refer to time-to-event outcomes, for instance, age-at-onset of a disease. To model censored traits in family-based designs, we used the frailty model, which incorporated not only fixed genetic effects of rare variants in a region of interest but also random polygenic effects shared within families. We first partitioned genotype scores of rare variants into orthogonal between- and within-family components, and then derived their corresponding efficient score statistics from the frailty model. Finally, FamBAC and FamKAC were constructed by aggregating the weighted efficient scores of the within-family components across rare variants and subjects. FamBAC collapsed rare variants within subject first to form a burden test that followed a chi-squared distribution; whereas FamKAC was a variant component test following a mixture of chi-squared distributions. For FamKAC, p-values can be computed by permutation tests or for computational efficiency by approximation methods. Through simulation studies, we showed that type I error was correctly controlled by FamBAC for various variant weighting schemes (0.0371 to 0.0527). However, FamKAC type I error rates based on approximation methods were deflated (max 0.0376) but improved by permutation tests. Our simulations also demonstrated that burden test FamBAC had higher power than kernel test FamKAC when high proportion (e.g. ≥ 80%) of causal variants had effects in the same direction. In contrast, when the effects of causal variants on the censored trait were in mixed directions, FamKAC outperformed FamBAC and had comparable or higher power than an existing method, RVFam. Our proposed framework has the flexibility to accommodate general nuclear families, and can be used to analyze sequence data for censored traits such as age-at-onset of a complex disease of interest.

| S-EPMC6347269 | biostudies-literature

Combining family- and population-based imputation data for association analysis of rare and common variants in large pedigrees.

Project description:In the last two decades, complex traits have become the main focus of genetic studies. The hypothesis that both rare and common variants are associated with complex traits is increasingly being discussed. Family-based association studies using relatively large pedigrees are suitable for both rare and common variant identification. Because of the high cost of sequencing technologies, imputation methods are important for increasing the amount of information at low cost. A recent family-based imputation method, Genotype Imputation Given Inheritance (GIGI), is able to handle large pedigrees and accurately impute rare variants, but does less well for common variants where population-based methods perform better. Here, we propose a flexible approach to combine imputation data from both family- and population-based methods. We also extend the Sequence Kernel Association Test for Rare and Common variants (SKAT-RC), originally proposed for data from unrelated subjects, to family data in order to make use of such imputed data. We call this extension "famSKAT-RC." We compare the performance of famSKAT-RC and several other existing burden and kernel association tests. In simulated pedigree sequence data, our results show an increase of imputation accuracy from use of our combining approach. Also, they show an increase of power of the association tests with this approach over the use of either family- or population-based imputation methods alone, in the context of rare and common variants. Moreover, our results show better performance of famSKAT-RC compared to the other considered tests, in most scenarios investigated here.

| S-EPMC4190076 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data