Dataset Information

A computerized scheme for lung nodule detection in multiprojection chest radiography.

ABSTRACT: Our previous study indicated that multiprojection chest radiography could significantly improve radiologists' performance for lung nodule detection in clinical practice. In this study, the authors further verify that multiprojection chest radiography can greatly improve the performance of a computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) scheme.Our database consisted of 59 subjects, including 43 subjects with 45 nodules and 16 subjects without nodules. The 45 nodules included 7 real and 38 simulated ones. The authors developed a conventional CAD scheme and a new fusion CAD scheme to detect lung nodules. The conventional CAD scheme consisted of four steps for (1) identification of initial nodule candidates inside lungs, (2) nodule candidate segmentation based on dynamic programming, (3) extraction of 33 features from nodule candidates, and (4) false positive reduction using a piecewise linear classifier. The conventional CAD scheme processed each of the three projection images of a subject independently and discarded the correlation information between the three images. The fusion CAD scheme included the four steps in the conventional CAD scheme and two additional steps for (5) registration of all candidates in the three images of a subject, and (6) integration of correlation information between the registered candidates in the three images. The integration step retained all candidates detected at least twice in the three images of a subject and removed those detected only once in the three images as false positives. A leave-one-subject-out testing method was used for evaluation of the performance levels of the two CAD schemes.At the sensitivities of 70%, 65%, and 60%, our conventional CAD scheme reported 14.7, 11.3, and 8.6 false positives per image, respectively, whereas our fusion CAD scheme reported 3.9, 1.9, and 1.2 false positives per image, and 5.5, 2.8, and 1.7 false positives per patient, respectively. The low performance of the conventional CAD scheme may be attributed to the high noise level in chest radiography, and the small size and low contrast of most nodules.This study indicated that the fusion of correlation information in multiprojection chest radiography can markedly improve the performance of CAD scheme for lung nodule detection.

SUBMITTER: Guo W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3321052 | biostudies-other | 2012 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:To develop a computer-aided detection (CADe) scheme for nodules in chest radiographs (CXRs) with a high sensitivity and a low false-positive (FP) rate.The authors developed a CADe scheme consisting of five major steps, which were developed for improving the overall performance of CADe schemes. First, to segment the lung fields accurately, the authors developed a multisegment active shape model. Then, a two-stage nodule-enhancement technique was developed for improving the conspicuity of nodules. Initial nodule candidates were detected and segmented by using the clustering watershed algorithm. Thirty-one shape-, gray-level-, surface-, and gradient-based features were extracted from each segmented candidate for determining the feature space, including one of the new features based on the Canny edge detector to eliminate a major FP source caused by rib crossings. Finally, a nonlinear support vector machine (SVM) with a Gaussian kernel was employed for classification of the nodule candidates.To evaluate and compare the scheme to other published CADe schemes, the authors used a publicly available database containing 140 nodules in 140 CXRs and 93 normal CXRs. The CADe scheme based on the SVM classifier achieved sensitivities of 78.6% (110/140) and 71.4% (100/140) with averages of 5.0 (1165/233) FPs/image and 2.0 (466/233) FPs/image, respectively, in a leave-one-out cross-validation test, whereas the CADe scheme based on a linear discriminant analysis classifier had a sensitivity of 60.7% (85/140) at an FP rate of 5.0 FPs/image. For nodules classified as "very subtle" and "extremely subtle," a sensitivity of 57.1% (24/42) was achieved at an FP rate of 5.0 FPs/image. When the authors used a database developed at the University of Chicago, the sensitivities was 83.3% (40/48) and 77.1% (37/48) at an FP rate of 5.0 (240/48) FPs/image and 2.0 (96/48) FPs/image, respectively.These results compare favorably to those described for other commercial and non-commercial CADe nodule detection systems.

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate the performance of a deep learning-based algorithm in detecting lung cancers not reported on posteroanterior chest radiographs during routine practice.Materials and methodsThe retrospective test dataset included 168 posteroanterior chest radiographs acquired between March 2017 and December 2018 (168 patients; mean age, 71.9 years ± 9.5 [standard deviation]; age range, 42-91 years) with 187 lung cancers (mean size, 2.3 cm ± 1.2) undetected during initial clinical evaluation, and 50 normal chest radiographs. CT served as the reference standard for ground truth. Four thoracic radiologists independently reevaluated the chest radiographs for lung nodules both without and with the aid of the algorithm. The performances of the algorithm and the radiologists were evaluated and compared on a per-chest radiograph basis and a per-lesion basis, according to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the jackknife free-response ROC curve (AUFROC).ResultsThe algorithm showed excellent diagnostic performances both in terms of per-chest radiograph classification (AUROC, 0.899) and per-lesion localization (AUFROC, 0.744); both of these values were significantly higher than those of the radiologists (AUROC, 0.634-0.663; AUFROC, 0.619-0.651; P < .001 for all). The algorithm also demonstrated higher sensitivity (69.6% [117 of 168] vs 47.0% [316 of 672]; P < .001) and specificity (94.0% [47 of 50] vs 78.0% [156 of 200]; P = .01). When assisted by the algorithm, the radiologists' AUROC (0.634-0.663 vs 0.685-0.724; P < 0.01 for all) and pooled AUFROC (0.636 vs 0.688; P = .03) substantially improved. The false-positive rate of the algorithm, that is, the total number of false-positive nodules divided by the total number of chest radiographs, was similar to that of pooled radiologists (21.1% [46 of 218] vs 19.0% [166 of 872]; P > .05).ConclusionA deep learning-based nodule detection algorithm showed excellent detection performance of lung cancers that were not reported on chest radiographs during routine practice and significantly reduced reading errors when used as a second reader.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2020See also commentary by White in this issue.

Project description:Purpose To conduct a multi-institutional, multireader study to compare the performance of digital tomosynthesis, dual-energy (DE) imaging, and conventional chest radiography for pulmonary nodule detection and management. Materials and Methods In this binational, institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant prospective study, 158 subjects (43 subjects with normal findings) were enrolled at four institutions. Informed consent was obtained prior to enrollment. Subjects underwent chest computed tomography (CT) and imaging with conventional chest radiography (posteroanterior and lateral), DE imaging, and tomosynthesis with a flat-panel imaging device. Three experienced thoracic radiologists identified true locations of nodules (n = 516, 3-20-mm diameters) with CT and recommended case management by using Fleischner Society guidelines. Five other radiologists marked nodules and indicated case management by using images from conventional chest radiography, conventional chest radiography plus DE imaging, tomosynthesis, and tomosynthesis plus DE imaging. Sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy were measured by using the free-response receiver operating characteristic method and the receiver operating characteristic method for nodule detection and case management, respectively. Results were further analyzed according to nodule diameter categories (3-4 mm, >4 mm to 6 mm, >6 mm to 8 mm, and >8 mm to 20 mm). Results Maximum lesion localization fraction was higher for tomosynthesis than for conventional chest radiography in all nodule size categories (3.55-fold for all nodules, P < .001; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.96, 4.15). Case-level sensitivity was higher with tomosynthesis than with conventional chest radiography for all nodules (1.49-fold, P < .001; 95% CI: 1.25, 1.73). Case management decisions showed better overall accuracy with tomosynthesis than with conventional chest radiography, as given by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (1.23-fold, P < .001; 95% CI: 1.15, 1.32). There were no differences in any specificity measures. DE imaging did not significantly affect nodule detection when paired with either conventional chest radiography or tomosynthesis. Conclusion Tomosynthesis outperformed conventional chest radiography for lung nodule detection and determination of case management; DE imaging did not show significant differences over conventional chest radiography or tomosynthesis alone. These findings indicate performance likely achievable with a range of reader expertise. © RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Dataset Information

A computerized scheme for lung nodule detection in multiprojection chest radiography.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets