Dataset Information

Dynamic rotating-shield brachytherapy.

ABSTRACT: To present dynamic rotating shield brachytherapy (D-RSBT), a novel form of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with electronic brachytherapy source, where the radiation shield is capable of changing emission angles during the radiation delivery process.A D-RSBT system uses two layers of independently rotating tungsten alloy shields, each with a 180° azimuthal emission angle. The D-RSBT planning is separated into two stages: anchor plan optimization and optimal sequencing. In the anchor plan optimization, anchor plans are generated by maximizing the D90 for the high-risk clinical-tumor-volume (HR-CTV) assuming a fixed azimuthal emission angle of 11.25°. In the optimal sequencing, treatment plans that most closely approximate the anchor plans under the delivery-time constraint will be efficiently computed. Treatment plans for five cervical cancer patients were generated for D-RSBT, single-shield RSBT (S-RSBT), and (192)Ir-based intracavitary brachytherapy with supplementary interstitial brachytherapy (IS + ICBT) assuming five treatment fractions. External beam radiotherapy doses of 45 Gy in 25 fractions of 1.8 Gy each were accounted for. The high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) doses were escalated such that the D2cc of the rectum, sigmoid colon, or bladder reached its tolerance equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2 with α∕β = 3 Gy) of 75 Gy, 75 Gy, or 90 Gy, respectively.For the patients considered, IS + ICBT had an average total dwell time of 5.7 minutes∕fraction (min∕fx) assuming a 10 Ci(192)Ir source, and the average HR-CTV D90 was 78.9 Gy. In order to match the HR-CTV D90 of IS + ICBT, D-RSBT required an average of 10.1 min∕fx more delivery time, and S-RSBT required 6.7 min∕fx more. If an additional 20 min∕fx of delivery time is allowed beyond that of the IS + ICBT case, D-RSBT and S-RSBT increased the HR-CTV D90 above IS + ICBT by an average of 16.3 Gy and 9.1 Gy, respectively.For cervical cancer patients, D-RSBT can boost HR-CTV D90 over IS + ICBT and S-RSBT without violating the tolerance doses to the bladder, rectum, or sigmoid. The D90 improvements from D-RSBT depend on the patient, the delivery time budget, and the applicator structure.

SUBMITTER: Liu Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3838430 | biostudies-other | 2013 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:The authors present a rapid emission angle selection (REAS) method that enables the efficient selection of the azimuthal shield angle for rotating shield brachytherapy (RSBT). The REAS method produces a Pareto curve from which a potential RSBT user can select a treatment plan that balances the tradeoff between delivery time and tumor dose conformity.Two cervical cancer patients were considered as test cases for the REAS method. The RSBT source considered was a Xoft Axxent(TM) electronic brachytherapy source, partially shielded with 0.5 mm of tungsten, which traveled inside a tandem intrauterine applicator. Three anchor RSBT plans were generated for each case using dose-volume optimization, with azimuthal shield emission angles of 90°, 180°, and 270°. The REAS method converts the anchor plans to treatment plans for all possible emission angles by combining neighboring beamlets to form beamlets for larger emission angles. Treatment plans based on exhaustive dose-volume optimization (ERVO) and exhaustive surface optimization (ERSO) were also generated for both cases. Uniform dwell-time scaling was applied to all plans such that that high-risk clinical target volume D90 was maximized without violating the D2cc tolerances of the rectum, bladder, and sigmoid colon.By choosing three azimuthal emission angles out of 32 potential angles, the REAS method performs about 10 times faster than the ERVO method. By setting D90 to 85-100 Gy10, the delivery times used by REAS generated plans are 21.0% and 19.5% less than exhaustive surface optimized plans used by the two clinical cases. By setting the delivery time budget to 5-25 and 10-30 min∕fx, respectively, for two the cases, the D90 contributions for REAS are improved by 5.8% and 5.1% compared to the ERSO plans. The ranges used in this comparison were selected in order to keep both D90 and the delivery time within acceptable limits.The REAS method enables efficient RSBT treatment planning and delivery and provides treatment plans with comparable quality to those generated by exhaustive replanning with dose-volume optimization.

Project description:PurposeOcular brachytherapy is a standard-of-care surgical procedure for globe salvage in the treatment of uveal melanoma. The procedure involves the placement and subsequent removal of a radioactive plaque several days later. At many locations, patients are admitted on an inpatient basis until plaque removal due to radiation safety concerns. However, patients may be discharged to home after plaque insertion, and subsequently return to the medical facility for plaque removal. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and systematic financial benefit of the outpatient ocular brachytherapy program at "?>the University of Southern California (USC) Roski Eye Institute for 30 years.Methods and materialsA single-institution retrospective record review was performed on all 275 patients who underwent brachytherapy for ocular tumors between January 1, 1989 and December 31, 2019 to assess for occurrences of reportable radiation and/or patients safety events. The treatment protocols at our institution are described. Data on hospital-adjusted expenses per inpatient day from the American Hospital Association's 2018 Annual Survey were used as a proxy for costs to patients and the health care system to perform a cost-benefit analysis comparing outpatient versus inpatient brachytherapy.ResultsOf the 275 plaque procedures over a 30-year period that were reviewed, there were no internally or externally reportable patient or radiation safety events. There were no adverse events related to patient transportation to the hospital, the patient not returning for plaque removal, operative issues in removing the plaque on time due to cancelled or delayed cases, or loss of radioactive material. Additionally, our cost-benefit analysis estimates that outpatient brachytherapy reduced costs for USC's patients in 2018 by an average of $24,722 per patient treated with ocular brachytherapy.ConclusionsWith appropriate measures, outpatient ocular brachytherapy allows patients to safely return home with the added benefit of decreased financial burden for both patients and the broader health care system.

Dataset Information

Dynamic rotating-shield brachytherapy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets