Dataset Information

Periotome as an Aid to Atraumatic Extraction: A Comparative Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of periotomes in single rooted nonsurgical tooth extractions.A double blind, randomized controlled clinical trial of 100 patients requiring nonsurgical single rooted tooth extractions was performed. The subjects were randomized into the experimental group (underwent extractions with periotome and conventional extraction forceps) or into the control group (subjects underwent extractions using periosteal elevator and conventional extraction forceps). Pain was assessed using visual analogue scale all throughout 7 days postoperatively. Gingival laceration, duration of surgery, number and frequency of analgesics consumed and complications (if present) were also noted.On inter-group comparison, all the parameters were statistically significant in control group (p < 0.05). Also on pre and post-operative inter-group comparison, statistically significant pain reduction was noted in experimental group (52.8 %) whereas pain increased in control group (65 %).The results of this study suggest that use of periotome may be helpful in reducing post extraction discomfort.

SUBMITTER: Sharma SD

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4511886 | biostudies-other | 2015 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Periotome as an Aid to Atraumatic Extraction: A Comparative Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Sharma Sneha D SD Vidya B B Alexander Mohan M Deshmukh Sunny S

Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery 20141108 3

<h4>Aim</h4>The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of periotomes in single rooted nonsurgical tooth extractions.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>A double blind, randomized controlled clinical trial of 100 patients requiring nonsurgical single rooted tooth extractions was performed. The subjects were randomized into the experimental group (underwent extractions with periotome and conventional extraction forceps) or into the control group (subjects underwent extractions using periosteal e ...[more]

PMID: 26225052

Similar Datasets

Project description:One in ten people aged between 55 to 74 years have a significant hearing impairment in their better hearing ear (as defined by audiometric hearing thresholds). However, it is becoming increasingly clear that the challenges faced by older listeners cannot be explained by the audiogram alone. The ability for people with hearing loss to use cognition to support speech perception allows for compensation of the degraded auditory input. This in turn offers promise for new cognitive-based rehabilitative interventions. Working memory is known to be highly associated with language comprehension and recent evidence has shown significant generalization of learning from trained working memory tasks to improvements in sentence-repetition skills of children with severe to profound hearing loss. This evidence offers support for further investigation into the potential benefits of working memory training to improve speech perception abilities in other hearing impaired populations.This is a double-blind randomized active controlled trial aiming to assess whether a program of working memory training results in improvements in untrained measures of cognition, speech perception and self-reported hearing abilities in adult hearing aid users aged (50 to 74 years) with mild-to-moderate hearing loss hearing aid users, compared with an active control group who receive a placebo version of the working memory training program.The present study aims to generate high-quality preliminary evidence for the efficacy of working memory training for adult hearing aid users with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss who are existing hearing aid users. This trial addresses a number of gaps in the published literature assessing training interventions for people with hearing loss, and in the general literature surrounding working memory training, such as the inclusion of an active control group, participant and tester blinding, and increased transparency in reporting.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01892007. Date of registration: 27 June 2013.

Dataset Information

Periotome as an Aid to Atraumatic Extraction: A Comparative Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Publications

Periotome as an Aid to Atraumatic Extraction: A Comparative Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets