Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Parity and endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.


ABSTRACT: The association between parity and endometrial cancer risk is inconsistent from observational studies. We aimed to quantitatively assess the relationship by summarizing all relevant epidemiological studies. PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase and Scopus were searched up to February 2015 for eligible case-control studies and prospective studies. Random-effects model was used to pool risk estimations. Ten prospective studies, 35 case-control studies and 1 pooled analysis of 10 cohort and 14 case-control studies including 69681 patients were identified. Pooled analysis revealed that there was a significant inverse association between parity and risk of endometrial cancer (relative risk (RR) for parous versus nulliparous: 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.74; I(2) = 76.9%). By evaluating the number of parity, we identified that parity number of 1, 2 or 3 versus nulliparous demonstrated significant negative association (RR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.64-0.84, I(2)?= 88.3%; RR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.53-0.74, I(2)?= 92.1%; and RR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.65-0.70, I(2) = 20.0% respectively). The dose-response analysis suggested a nonlinear relationship between the number of parity and endometrial cancer risk. The RR decreased when the number of parity increased. This meta-analysis suggests that parity may be associated with a decreased risk of endometrial cancer. Further studies are warranted to replicate our findings.

SUBMITTER: Wu QJ 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4642705 | biostudies-other | 2015 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

altmetric image

Publications

Parity and endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.

Wu Qi-Jun QJ   Li Yuan-Yuan YY   Tu Chao C   Zhu Jingjing J   Qian Ke-Qing KQ   Feng Tong-Bao TB   Li Changwei C   Wu Lang L   Ma Xiao-Xin XX  

Scientific reports 20150916


The association between parity and endometrial cancer risk is inconsistent from observational studies. We aimed to quantitatively assess the relationship by summarizing all relevant epidemiological studies. PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase and Scopus were searched up to February 2015 for eligible case-control studies and prospective studies. Random-effects model was used to pool risk estimations. Ten prospective studies, 35 case-control studies and 1 pooled analysis of 10 cohort and 14 case-control stud  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4831293 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC4645223 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5558442 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5710957 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4060503 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC3962437 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3787107 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4189919 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4566123 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7657120 | biostudies-literature