Dataset Information

Routine vs extended outpatient EEG for the detection of interictal epileptiform discharges.

ABSTRACT: To compare the yield of epileptiform abnormalities on 30-minute recordings with those greater than 45 minutes.We performed a prospective observational cross-sectional study of all outpatient routine EEGs comparing the rate of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) and clinical events during the initial 30 minutes (routine) with those occurring in the remaining 30-60 minutes (extended). A relative increase of 10% was considered clinically significant.EEGs from 1,803 patients were included; overall EEG duration was 59.4 minutes (SD ±6.5). Of 426 patients with IEDs at any time during the EEG, 81 (19.1%, 95% confidence interval 15.6-23) occurred only after the initial 30 minutes. The rate of late IEDs was not associated with age, indication, IED type, or sleep deprivation. Longer recording times also increased event capture rate by approximately 30%.The yield of IED and event detection is increased in extended outpatient EEGs compared to 30-minute studies.

SUBMITTER: Burkholder DB

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4836883 | biostudies-other | 2016 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Routine vs extended outpatient EEG for the detection of interictal epileptiform discharges.

Burkholder David B DB Britton Jeffrey W JW Rajasekaran Vijayalakshmi V Fabris Rachel R RR Cherian Perumpillichira J PJ Kelly-Williams Kristen M KM So Elson L EL Nickels Katherine C KC Wong-Kisiel Lily C LC Lagerlund Terrence D TD Cascino Gregory D GD Worrell Gregory A GA Wirrell Elaine C EC

Neurology 20160316 16

<h4>Objective</h4>To compare the yield of epileptiform abnormalities on 30-minute recordings with those greater than 45 minutes.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a prospective observational cross-sectional study of all outpatient routine EEGs comparing the rate of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) and clinical events during the initial 30 minutes (routine) with those occurring in the remaining 30-60 minutes (extended). A relative increase of 10% was considered clinically significant.<h4>Resul ...[more]

PMID: 26984946

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveThis study was undertaken to evaluate the influence that subject-specific factors have on intracranial interictal epileptiform discharge (IED) rates in persons with refractory epilepsy.MethodsOne hundred fifty subjects with intracranial electrodes performed multiple sessions of a free recall memory task; this standardized task controlled for subject attention levels. We utilized a dominance analysis to rank the importance of subject-specific factors based on their relative influence on IED rates. Linear mixed-effects models were employed to comprehensively examine factors with highly ranked importance.ResultsAntiseizure medication (ASM) status, time of testing, and seizure onset zone (SOZ) location were the highest-ranking factors in terms of their impact on IED rates. The average IED rate of electrodes in SOZs was 34% higher than the average IED rate of electrodes outside of SOZs (non-SOZ; p < .001). However, non-SOZ electrodes had similar IED rates regardless of the subject's SOZ location (p = .99). Subjects on older generation (p < .001) and combined generation (p < .001) ASM regimens had significantly lower IED rates relative to the group taking no ASMs; newer generation ASM regimens demonstrated a nonsignificant association with IED rates (p = .13). Of the ASMs included in this study, the following ASMs were associated with significant reductions in IED rates: levetiracetam (p < .001), carbamazepine (p < .001), lacosamide (p = .03), zonisamide (p = .01), lamotrigine (p = .03), phenytoin (p = .03), and topiramate (p = .01). We observed a nonsignificant association between time of testing and IED rates (morning-afternoon p = .15, morning-evening p = .85, afternoon-evening p = .26).SignificanceThe current study ranks the relative influence that subject-specific factors have on IED rates and highlights the importance of considering certain factors, such as SOZ location and ASM status, when analyzing IEDs for clinical or research purposes.

Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithms for identifying the presence of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) in routine (20-min) electroencephalography (EEG) recordings.MethodsWe evaluated two approaches: a fully automated one and a hybrid approach, where three human raters applied an operational IED definition to assess the automated detections grouped into clusters by the algorithms. We used three previously developed AI algorithms: Encevis, SpikeNet, and Persyst. The diagnostic gold standard (epilepsy or not) was derived from video-EEG recordings of patients' habitual clinical episodes. We compared the algorithms with the gold standard at the recording level (epileptic or not). The independent validation data set (not used for training) consisted of 20-min EEG recordings containing sharp transients (epileptiform or not) from 60 patients: 30 with epilepsy (with a total of 340 IEDs) and 30 with nonepileptic paroxysmal events. We compared sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy, and the review time-burden of the fully automated and hybrid approaches, with the conventional visual assessment of the whole recordings, based solely on unrestricted expert opinion.ResultsFor all three AI algorithms, the specificity of the fully automated approach was too low for clinical implementation (16.67%; 63.33%; 3.33%), despite the high sensitivity (96.67%; 66.67%; 100.00%). Using the hybrid approach significantly increased the specificity (93.33%; 96.67%; 96.67%) with good sensitivity (93.33%; 56.67%; 76.67%). The overall accuracy of the hybrid methods (93.33%; 76.67%; 86.67%) was similar to the conventional visual assessment of the whole recordings (83.33%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 71.48-91.70%; p > .5), yet the time-burden of review was significantly lower (p < .001).SignificanceThe hybrid approach, where human raters apply the operational IED criteria to automated detections of AI-based algorithms, has high specificity, good sensitivity, and overall accuracy similar to conventional EEG reading, with a significantly lower time-burden. The hybrid approach is accurate and suitable for clinical implementation.

Dataset Information

Routine vs extended outpatient EEG for the detection of interictal epileptiform discharges.

Publications

Routine vs extended outpatient EEG for the detection of interictal epileptiform discharges.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets