Dataset Information

ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE PATTERN OF ISOLATES FROM WOUND AND SOFT TISSUE INFECTIONS.

ABSTRACT: Two-hundred and eighty bacterial isolates from wound and soft tissue infections were studied for species identification and antibiotic resistance pattern. Amongst them 122 isolates were from community acquired infection and 158 were from nosocomial infections. The common community acquired pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (67.8%) and Streptococcus pyogenes (10.7%), whereas Staphylococcus aureus (60.1%) and E. Coli (8.9%) were common in nosocomial infection. Only two anaerobes (Cl perfringens) were isolated. Penicillin resistance was found to be 87% and 92% for Staphylococccus aureus in community acquired and noscomial infections respectively. 85% of Proteus isolates were resistant to ampicillin. There was relatively lower level of resistance by all isolates to cefotaxime. Gentamicin showed higher rate of resistance than netilmicin and amikacin. Resistance of E. coli isolates to fluoroquinolones being 79% for norfloxacin, 81% for ciprofloxacin and 60% for ofloxacin. The study showed a higher resistance of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) to other antibiotics. Amikacin and ofloxacin were the best recommended drugs for empirical therapy for all organisms, the susceptibility rate being 80.7% and 80.4%.

SUBMITTER: Misra RN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5532042 | biostudies-other | 2000 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSkin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) in hospital and community settings impose a substantial socio-economic burden. Therapeutic uncertainty due to the availability of a wide range of antibiotics and the need for empirical treatment decisions complicate SSTI clinical management. Completion of numerous pairwise meta-analyses to account for this variability in antibiotics is impractical, and many head-to-head comparisons of potential interest are likely not available. In comparing multiple antibiotics simultaneously, this network meta-analysis aims to identify the antibiotic(s) with the greatest value in the treatment of SSTIs, in terms of patient-important outcomes such as efficacy and safety.MethodsWe will conduct a systematic review to identify randomized controlled trials of persons with suspected or confirmed SSTI assigned to orally or parenterally administered antibiotic therapy that report results on at least one outcome of interest. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), along with trial registries. Our primary outcome of interest is clinical success at the test-of-cure visit. Secondary outcomes may include (1) early clinical success (2-3 days after the therapy starts), (2) mortality, (3) adverse events, (4) treatment duration, and (5) length of hospital stay. Independent reviewers will complete screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts, data extraction, risk of bias assessment (using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool), and evaluation of the certainty of evidence (using the GRADE approach) in duplicate. We will complete pairwise and network meta-analyses within the Bayesian framework when possible using a random effects model. We will stratify SSTIs by severity into uncomplicated and complicated SSTIs when possible. Subgroup analyses by age, infection type, comorbidity, and suspected or confirmed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-associated infection are planned.DiscussionThis study has several strengths compared to previous reviews: inclusion of a wider range of infection types, antibiotics, and outcomes; a comprehensive search strategy; a priori subgroup analyses; application of GRADE; and improved interpretability of findings through visual presentation of results. We hope our findings will inform future research, health care professionals, and policy makers resulting in improved evidence-based clinical management of SSTIs.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42018085607.

Dataset Information

ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE PATTERN OF ISOLATES FROM WOUND AND SOFT TISSUE INFECTIONS.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets