The inclusive fitness controversy: finding a way forward.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: This paper attempts to reconcile critics and defenders of inclusive fitness by constructing a synthesis that does justice to the insights of both. I argue that criticisms of the regression-based version of Hamilton's rule, although they undermine its use for predictive purposes, do not undermine its use as an organizing framework for social evolution research. I argue that the assumptions underlying the concept of inclusive fitness, conceived as a causal property of an individual organism, are unlikely to be exactly true in real populations, but they are approximately true given a specific type of weak selection that Hamilton took, on independent grounds, to be responsible for the cumulative assembly of complex adaptation. Finally, I reflect on the uses and limitations of 'design thinking' in social evolution research.
SUBMITTER: Birch J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5541557 | biostudies-other | 2017 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
ACCESS DATA