Dataset Information

Air-insufflated high-definition dacryoendoscopy yields significantly better image quality than conventional dacryoendoscopy.

ABSTRACT: To facilitate the analysis of lacrimal conditions, we utilized high-definition dacryoendoscopy (HDD) and undertook observations with a pressure-controlled air-insufflation system. We report the safety and performance of HDD.In this retrospective, non-randomized clinical trial, 46 patients (14 males and 32 females; age range 39-91 years; mean age ± SD 70.3±12.0 years) who had lacrimal disorders were examined with HDD and conventional dacryoendoscopy (CD). The high-definition dacryoendoscope had 15,000 picture element image fibers and an advanced objective lens. Its outer diameter was 0.9-1.2 mm. Air insufflation was controlled at 0-20 kPa with a digital manometer-based pressure-controlled air-insufflation system to evaluate the quality of the image. The HDD had an air/saline irrigation channel between the outer sheath (outer diameter =1.2 mm) and the metal inner sheath of the endoscope. We used it and the CD in air, saline, and diluted milk saline with and without manual irrigation to quantitatively evaluate the effect of air pressure and saline irrigation on image quality.In vivo, the most significant improvement in image quality was demonstrated with air-insufflated (5-15 kPa) HDD, as compared with saline-irrigated HDD and saline-irrigated CD. No emphysema or damage was noted under observation with HDD. In vitro, no significant difference was demonstrated between air-insufflated HDD and saline-irrigated HDD. In vitro, the image quality of air-insufflated HDD was significantly improved as compared with that of saline-irrigated CD.Pressure-controlled (5-15 kPa) air-insufflated HDD is safe, and yields significantly better image quality than CD and saline-irrigated HDD.

SUBMITTER: Sasaki T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5546830 | biostudies-other | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe high-definition standard (HD-standard) scan mode has been proven to display stents better than the standard (STND) scan mode but with more image noise. Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) is capable of reducing image noise. This study examined the impact of HD-standard scan mode with DLIR algorithms on stent and coronary artery image quality in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) via a comparison with conventional STND scan mode and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V) algorithms.MethodsThe data of 121 patients who underwent HD-standard mode scans (group A: N=47, with coronary stent) or STND mode scans (group B: N=74, without coronary stent) were retrospectively collected. All images were reconstructed with ASIR-V at a level of 50% (ASIR-V50%) and a level of 80% (ASIR-V80%) and with DLIR at medium (DLIR-M) and high (DLIR-H) levels. The noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), artifact index (AI), and in-stent diameter were measured as objective evaluation parameters. Subjective assessment involved a 5-point scale for overall image quality, image noise, stent appearance, stent artifacts, vascular sharpness, and diagnostic confidence. Diagnostic confidence was evaluated based on the presence or absence of significant stenosis (≥50% lumen reduction). Both subjective and objective evaluations were conducted by two radiologists independently, with kappa and intraclass correlation statistics being used to test the interobserver agreement.ResultsThere were 76 evaluable stents in group A, and the DLIR-H algorithm significantly outperformed other algorithms, demonstrating the lowest noise (41.6±7.1/41.3±7.2) and AI (32.4±8.9/31.2±10.1), the highest SNR (14.6±3.5/15.0±3.5) and CNR (13.6±3.8/13.9±3.8), and the largest in-stent diameter (2.18±0.61/2.19±0.61) in representing true stent diameter (all P values <0.01), as well as the highest score in each subjective evaluation parameter. In group B, a total of 296 coronary arteries were evaluated, and the DLIR-H algorithm provided the best objective image quality, with statistically superior noise, SNR, and CNR compared with the other algorithms (all P values <0.05). Moreover, the HD-standard mode scan with DLIR provided better image quality and a lower radiation dose than did the STND mode scan with ASIR-V (P<0.01).ConclusionsHD-standard scan mode with DLIR-H improves image quality of both stents and coronary arteries on CCTA under a lower radiation dose.

Project description:ObjectivesThis study was conducted in order to compare the effect of field of view (FOV) size on image quality between ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT) and conventional high-resolution CT (HRCT).MethodsEleven cadaveric lungs were scanned with U-HRCT and conventional HRCT and reconstructed with five FOVs (40, 80, 160, 240, and 320 mm). Three radiologists evaluated and scored the images. Three image evaluations were performed, comparing the image quality with the five FOVs with respect to the 160-mm FOV. The first evaluation was performed on conventional HRCT images, and the second evaluation on U-HRCT images. Images were scored on normal structure, abnormal findings, and overall image quality. The third evaluation was a comparison of the images obtained with conventional HRCT and U-HRCT, with scoring performed on overall image quality. Quantitative evaluation of noise was performed by setting ROIs.ResultsIn conventional HRCT, image quality was improved when the FOV was reduced to 160 mm. In U-HRCT, image quality, except for noise, improved when the FOV was reduced to 80 mm. In the third evaluation, overall image quality was improved in U-HRCT over conventional HRCT at all FOVs. Noise of U-HRCT increased with respect to conventional HRCT when the FOV was reduced from 160 to 40 mm. However, at 240- and 320-mm FOVs, the noise of U-HRCT and conventional HRCT showed no differences.ConclusionsIn conventional HRCT, image quality did not improve when the FOV was reduced below 160 mm. However, in U-HRCT, image quality improved even when the FOV was reduced to 80 mm.Key points• Reducing the size of the field of view to 160 mm improves diagnostic imaging quality in high-resolution CT. • In ultra-high-resolution CT, improvements in image quality can be obtained by reducing the size of the field of view to 80 mm. • Ultra-high-resolution CT produces images of higher quality compared with conventional HRCT irrespective of the size of the field of view.

Project description:High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) seems to overcome a drawback of traditional bipolar tDCS: the wide-spread diffusion of the electric field. Nevertheless, most of the differences that characterise the two techniques are based on mathematical simulations and not on real, behavioural and neurophysiological, data. The study aims to compare a widespread tDCS montage (i.e., a Conventional bipolar montage with extracephalic return electrode) and HD-tDCS, investigating differences both at a behavioural level, in terms of dexterity performance, and a neurophysiological level, as modifications of alpha and beta power as measured with EEG. Thirty participants took part in three sessions, one for each montage: Conventional tDCS, HD-tDCS, and sham. In all the conditions, the anode was placed over C4, while the cathode/s placed according to the montage. At baseline, during, and after each stimulation condition, dexterity was assessed with a Finger Tapping Task. In addition, resting-state EEG was recorded at baseline and after the stimulation. Power spectrum density was calculated, selecting two frequency bands: alpha (8-12 Hz) and beta (18-22 Hz). Linear mixed effect models (LMMs) were used to analyse the modulation induced by tDCS. To evaluate differences among the montages and consider state-dependency phenomenon, the post-stimulation measurements were covariate-adjusted for baseline levels. We observed that HD-tDCS induced an alpha power reduction in participants with lower alpha at baseline. Conversely, Conventional tDCS induced a beta power reduction in participants with higher beta at baseline. Furthermore, data showed a trend towards a behavioural effect of HD-tDCS in participants with lower beta at baseline showing faster response times. Conventional and HD-tDCS distinctively modulated cortical activity. The study highlights the importance of considering state-dependency to determine the effects of tDCS on individuals.

Dataset Information

Air-insufflated high-definition dacryoendoscopy yields significantly better image quality than conventional dacryoendoscopy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets