Dataset Information

Comprehensive evaluation of published gene expression prognostic signatures for biomarker-based lung cancer clinical studies.

ABSTRACT: A more accurate prognosis for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients could aid in the identification of patients at high risk for recurrence. Many NSCLC mRNA expression signatures claiming to be prognostic have been reported in the literature. The goal of this study was to identify the most promising mRNA prognostic signatures in NSCLC for further prospective clinical validation.We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of published mRNA prognostic signatures for resected NSCLC. The prognostic performance of each signature was evaluated via a meta-analysis of 1927 early stage NSCLC patients collected from 15 studies using three evaluation metrics (hazard ratios, concordance scores, and time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic curves). The performance of each signature was then evaluated against 100 random signatures. The prognostic power independent of clinical risk factors was assessed by multivariate Cox models.Through a literature search, we identified 42 lung cancer prognostic signatures derived from genome-wide expression profiling analysis. Based on meta-analysis, 25 signatures were prognostic for survival after adjusting for clinical risk factors and 18 signatures carried out significantly better than random signatures. When analyzing histology types separately, 17 signatures and 8 signatures are prognostic for adenocarcinoma and squamous cell lung cancer, respectively. Despite little overlap among published gene signatures, the top-performing signatures are highly concordant in predicted patient outcomes.Based on this large-scale meta-analysis, we identified a set of mRNA expression prognostic signatures appropriate for further validation in prospective clinical studies.

SUBMITTER: Tang H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5834090 | biostudies-other | 2017 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comprehensive evaluation of published gene expression prognostic signatures for biomarker-based lung cancer clinical studies.

Tang H H Wang S S Xiao G G Schiller J J Papadimitrakopoulou V V Minna J J Wistuba I I II Xie Y Y

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology 20170401 4

<h4>Background</h4>A more accurate prognosis for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients could aid in the identification of patients at high risk for recurrence. Many NSCLC mRNA expression signatures claiming to be prognostic have been reported in the literature. The goal of this study was to identify the most promising mRNA prognostic signatures in NSCLC for further prospective clinical validation.<h4>Experimental design</h4>We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of published ...[more]

PMID: 28200038

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) stands as the most prevalent histological subtype of lung cancer, exhibiting heterogeneity in outcomes and diverse responses to therapy. CD8 T cells are consistently present throughout all stages of tumor development and play a pivotal role within the tumor microenvironment (TME). Our objective was to investigate the expression profiles of CD8 T cell marker genes, establish a prognostic risk model based on these genes in LUAD, and explore its relationship with immunotherapy response.MethodsBy leveraging the expression data and clinical records from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) cohorts, we identified 23 consensus prognostic genes. Employing ten machine-learning algorithms, we generated 101 combinations, ultimately selecting the optimal algorithm to construct an artificial intelligence-derived prognostic signature named riskScore. This selection was based on the average concordance index (C-index) across three testing cohorts.ResultsRiskScore emerged as an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS), progression-free interval (PFI), disease-free interval (DFI), and disease-specific survival (DSS) in LUAD. Notably, riskScore exhibited notably superior predictive accuracy compared to traditional clinical variables. Furthermore, we observed a positive correlation between the high-risk riskScore group and tumor-promoting biological functions, lower tumor mutational burden (TMB), lower neoantigen (NEO) load, and lower microsatellite instability (MSI) scores, as well as reduced immune cell infiltration and an increased probability of immune evasion within the TME. Of significance, the immunophenoscore (IPS) score displayed significant differences among risk subgroups, and riskScore effectively stratified patients in the IMvigor210 and GSE135222 immunotherapy cohort based on their survival outcomes. Additionally, we identified potential drugs that could target specific risk subgroups.ConclusionsIn summary, riskScore demonstrates its potential as a robust and promising tool for guiding clinical management and tailoring individualized treatments for LUAD patients.

Project description:BackgroundImmunotherapy has changed the therapeutic landscape of cervical cancer (CC), but has durable anti-tumor activity only in a subset of patients. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of CC and to mine biomarkers related to immunotherapy and prognosis.MethodsThe Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data was utilized to identify heterogeneous immune subtypes based on survival-related immune cell signatures (ICSs). ICSs prognostic model was constructed by Cox regression analyses, and immunohistochemistry was conducted to verify the gene with the largest weight coefficient in the model. Meanwhile, the tumor immune infiltration landscape was comprehensively characterized by ESTIMATE, CIBERSORT and MCPcounter algorithms. In addition, we also analyzed the differences in immunotherapy-related biomarkers between high and low-risk groups. IMvigor210 and two gynecologic tumor cohorts were used to validate the reliability and scalability of the Risk score.ResultsA total of 291 TCGA-CC samples were divided into two ICSs clusters with significant differences in immune infiltration landscape and prognosis. ICSs prognostic model was constructed based on eight immune-related genes (IRGs), which showed higher overall survival (OS) rate in the low-risk group (P< 0.001). In the total population, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves displayed area under the curve (AUC) of 0.870, 0.785 and 0.774 at 1-, 3- and 5-years. Immunohistochemical results showed that the expression of the oncogene (FKBP10) was negatively correlated with the degree of differentiation and positively correlated with tumor stage, while the expression of tumor suppressor genes (S1PR4) was the opposite. In addition, the low-risk group had more favorable immune activation phenotype and higher enrichment of immunotherapy-related biomarkers. The Imvigor210 and two gynecologic tumor cohorts validated a better survival advantage and immune efficacy in the low-risk group.ConclusionThis study comprehensively assessed the TIME of CC and constructed an ICSs prognostic model, which provides an effective tool for predicting patient's prognosis and accurate immunotherapy.

Project description:BackgroundThioredoxin-1 (TXN), a redox balance factor, plays an essential role in oxidative stress and has been shown to act as a potential contributor to various cancers. This study evaluated the role of TXN in lung cancer by bioinformatics analyses.Materials and methodsGenes differentially expressed in lung cancer and oxidative stress related genes were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas, Gene Expression Omnibus and GeneCards databases. Following identification of TXN as an optimal differentially expressed gene by bioinformatics, the prognostic value of TXN in lung cancer was evaluated by univariate/multivariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, with validation by receiver operation characteristic curve analysis. The association between TXN expression and lung cancer was verified by immunohistochemical analysis of the Human Protein Atlas database, as well as by western blotting and qPCR. Cell proliferation was determined by cell counting kit-8 after changing TXN expression using lentiviral transfection.ResultsTwenty differentially expressed oxidative stress genes were identified. Differential expression analysis identified five genes (CASP3, CAT, TXN, GSR, and HSPA4) and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis identified four genes (IL-6, CYCS, TXN, and BCL2) that differed significantly in lung cancer and normal lung tissue, indicating that TXN was an optimal differentially expressed gene. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that T stage (T3/T4), N stage (N2/N3), curative effect (progressive diseases) and high TXN expression were associated with poor survival, although high TXN expression was poorly predictive of overall survival. TXN was highly expressed in lung cancer tissues and cells. Knockdown of TXN suppressed cell proliferation, while overexpression of TXN enhanced cell proliferation.ConclusionHigh expression of TXN plays an important role in lung cancer development and prognosis. Because it is a prospective prognostic factor, targeting TXN may have clinical benefits in the treatment of lung cancer.

Dataset Information

Comprehensive evaluation of published gene expression prognostic signatures for biomarker-based lung cancer clinical studies.

Publications

Comprehensive evaluation of published gene expression prognostic signatures for biomarker-based lung cancer clinical studies.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets