Dataset Information

Comparing the efficacy of Morphine alone with Morphine and mgso4 in pain management after coronary artery bypass surgery.

ABSTRACT: To compare the effectiveness of Morphine alone and Morphine with MgSo4 in pain management after CABG surgery.This randomized control trial was conducted in the department of anesthesia and critical care Choudhary Pervaiz Ellahi Institute of Cardiology, Multan from November 2016 to June 2017. All collected data was entered and analyzed by using computer software SPSS version 23.1. Quantitative data like age, VAS score was analyzed and presented as mean and standard deviation. Similarly qualitative data like gender and ASA status was calculated and presented as frequency and percentages. Independent sample T-test was applied for significance of VAS score. P value ≤0.05 was considered as significant.A total number of 150 patients of both genders were included in this study. The main outcome variables of our study were VAS score. It was observed that, in group (M), the mean VAS score after 4, 12 and 24 hours of operation was 5.24±1.61, 5.8±2.27 and 5.44±2.27 respectively. And in group (MM), the mean VAS score after 4, 12 and 24 hours of operation was 4.36±2.58, 3.48±2.10 and 4.12±1.05 respectively. It was noted that both groups had statically significant difference of VAS score, as group (M) had higher VAS score than group (MM).Morphine with Mgso4 has better efficacy as compared to morphine alone when used as analgesic agent after CABG surgery.

SUBMITTER: Ahmad RA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5954378 | biostudies-other | 2018 Mar-Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparing the efficacy of Morphine alone with Morphine and mgso4 in pain management after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Ahmad Rana Altaf RA Ahmad Syed Suhail SS Hamid Waqas W Furqan Aamir A

Pakistan journal of medical sciences 20180301 2

<h4>Objective</h4>To compare the effectiveness of Morphine alone and Morphine with MgSo4 in pain management after CABG surgery.<h4>Methods</h4>This randomized control trial was conducted in the department of anesthesia and critical care Choudhary Pervaiz Ellahi Institute of Cardiology, Multan from November 2016 to June 2017. All collected data was entered and analyzed by using computer software SPSS version 23.1. Quantitative data like age, VAS score was analyzed and presented as mean and standa ...[more]

PMID: 29805407

Similar Datasets

Project description:Postoperative pain is a complex process commonly caused by surgical trauma. It is one of the major concerns of patients undergoing heart surgery. Despite new techniques and modern analgesic treatments, postoperative pain is still one of the most important controversial issues.68 patients scheduled for elective CABG with CPB were included in a prospective, double-blind clinical trial. They were randomly divided into two groups. One group received PCA pump including morphine (group P) with underlying infusion of 0.02 mg/kg/Qh, bolus dose of 1 mg, lockout time of 15 minutes, and a maximum of 4 bolus of 0.02 mg/kg for one hour and the other group received morphine bolus (group B). Three patients were excluded from the study, and 33 and 32 patients participated in the groups P and B, respectively. Variables including age, gender, pump time, aortic clamp time, duration of surgery, complications (nausea and vomiting, GI Bleeding, and hypoxia), level of pain based on VAS, opioid consumption, hemodynamic, and sedation status were measured in both groups.There was no significant difference between the groups regarding age, gender, pump time, clamp time, duration of surgery, complication, sedation score, and hemodynamic status in most of the assessment periods. By assessing the pain severity in the groups at different periods, results showed a significant difference between the groups except at enrollment, and a lower severity of pain was noted in the group P compared to the group B. The consumed opioid was significantly higher in the group P than in the group B. However, higher doses of diclofenac and paracetamol were administered in the group B compared to the group P.Results showed that higher morphine would be used in patients with PCA pump after extubation following heart surgery, and this increased dose of opioid was associated with better pain control and lack of complication. Therefore, PCA pump with underlying infusion could be effectively used in patients undergoing CABG that are directly assessed in intensive care unite.

Project description:ObjectiveThe Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network reported that left ventricular reverse remodeling at 2 years did not differ between patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation randomized to coronary artery bypass grafting plus mitral valve repair (n = 150) or coronary artery bypass grafting alone (n = 151). To address health resource use implications, we compared costs and quality-adjusted survival.MethodsWe used individual patient data from the Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network trial on survival, hospitalizations, quality of life, and US hospitalization costs to estimate cumulative costs and quality-adjusted life years. A microsimulation model was developed to extrapolate to 10 years. Bootstrap and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed to address uncertainty.ResultsIn-hospital costs were $59,745 for coronary artery bypass grafting plus mitral valve repair versus $51,326 for coronary artery bypass grafting alone (difference $8419; 95% uncertainty interval, 2259-18,757). Two-year costs were $81,263 versus $67,341 (difference 13,922 [2370 to 28,888]), and quality-adjusted life years were 1.35 versus 1.30 (difference 0.05; -0.04 to 0.14), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $308,343/quality-adjusted life year for coronary artery bypass grafting plus mitral valve repair. At 10 years, its costs remained higher ($107,733 vs $88,583, difference 19,150 [-3866 to 56,826]) and quality-adjusted life years showed no difference (-0.92 to 0.87), with 5.08 versus 5.08. The likelihood that coronary artery bypass grafting plus mitral valve repair would be considered cost-effective at 10 years based on a cost-effectiveness threshold of $100K/quality-adjusted life year did not exceed 37%. Only when this procedure reduces the death rate by a relative 5% will the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio fall below $100K/quality-adjusted life year.ConclusionsThe addition of mitral valve repair to coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation is unlikely to be cost-effective. Only if late mortality benefits can be demonstrated will it meet commonly used cost-effectiveness criteria.

Dataset Information

Comparing the efficacy of Morphine alone with Morphine and mgso4 in pain management after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Publications

Comparing the efficacy of Morphine alone with Morphine and mgso4 in pain management after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets