Dataset Information

Robustness and evolvability of heterogeneous cell populations.

ABSTRACT: Biological systems are endowed with two fundamental but seemingly contradictory properties: robustness, the ability to withstand environmental fluctuations and genetic variability; and evolvability, the ability to acquire selectable and heritable phenotypic changes. Cell populations with heterogeneous genetic makeup, such as those of infectious microbial organisms or cancer, rely on their inherent robustness to maintain viability and fitness, but when encountering environmental insults, such as drug treatment, these populations are also poised for rapid adaptation through evolutionary selection. In this study, we develop a general mathematical model that allows us to explain and quantify this fundamental relationship between robustness and evolvability of heterogeneous cell populations. Our model predicts that robustness is, in fact, essential for evolvability, especially for more adverse environments, a trend we observe in aneuploid budding yeast and breast cancer cells. Robustness also compensates for the negative impact of the systems' complexity on their evolvability. Our model also provides a mathematical means to estimate the number of independent processes underlying a system's performance and identify the most generally adapted subpopulation, which may resemble the multi-drug-resistant "persister" cells observed in cancer.

SUBMITTER: Kucharavy A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5994894 | biostudies-other | 2018 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Robustness and evolvability of heterogeneous cell populations.

Kucharavy Andrei A Rubinstein Boris B Zhu Jin J Li Rong R

Molecular biology of the cell 20180405 11

Biological systems are endowed with two fundamental but seemingly contradictory properties: robustness, the ability to withstand environmental fluctuations and genetic variability; and evolvability, the ability to acquire selectable and heritable phenotypic changes. Cell populations with heterogeneous genetic makeup, such as those of infectious microbial organisms or cancer, rely on their inherent robustness to maintain viability and fitness, but when encountering environmental insults, such as ...[more]

PMID: 29851566

Similar Datasets

Project description:Robustness and evolvability are highly intertwined properties of biological systems. The relationship between these properties determines how biological systems are able to withstand mutations and show variation in response to them. Computational studies have explored the relationship between these two properties using neutral networks of RNA sequences (genotype) and their secondary structures (phenotype) as a model system. However, these studies have assumed every mutation to a sequence to be equally likely; the differences in the likelihood of the occurrence of various mutations, and the consequence of probabilistic nature of the mutations in such a system have previously been ignored. Associating probabilities to mutations essentially results in the weighting of genotype space. We here perform a comparative analysis of weighted and unweighted neutral networks of RNA sequences, and subsequently explore the relationship between robustness and evolvability. We show that assuming an equal likelihood for all mutations (as in an unweighted network), underestimates robustness and overestimates evolvability of a system. In spite of discarding this assumption, we observe that a negative correlation between sequence (genotype) robustness and sequence evolvability persists, and also that structure (phenotype) robustness promotes structure evolvability, as observed in earlier studies using unweighted networks. We also study the effects of base composition bias on robustness and evolvability. Particularly, we explore the association between robustness and evolvability in a sequence space that is AU-rich-sequences with an AU content of 80% or higher, compared to a normal (unbiased) sequence space. We find that evolvability of both sequences and structures in an AU-rich space is lesser compared to the normal space, and robustness higher. We also observe that AU-rich populations evolving on neutral networks of phenotypes, can access less phenotypic variation compared to normal populations evolving on neutral networks.

Project description:Cellular phenotypes underpinned by regulatory networks need to respond to evolutionary pressures to allow adaptation, but at the same time be robust to perturbations. This creates a conflict in which mutations affecting regulatory networks must both generate variance but also be tolerated at the phenotype level. Here, we perform mathematical analyses and simulations of regulatory networks to better understand the potential trade-off between robustness and evolvability. Examining the phenotypic effects of mutations, we find an inverse correlation between robustness and evolvability that breaks only with nonlinearity in the network dynamics, through the creation of regions presenting sudden changes in phenotype with small changes in genotype. For genotypes embedding low levels of nonlinearity, robustness and evolvability correlate negatively and almost perfectly. By contrast, genotypes embedding nonlinear dynamics allow expression levels to be robust to small perturbations, while generating high diversity (evolvability) under larger perturbations. Thus, nonlinearity breaks the robustness-evolvability trade-off in gene expression levels by allowing disparate responses to different mutations. Using analytical derivations of robustness and system sensitivity, we show that these findings extend to a large class of gene regulatory network architectures and also hold for experimentally observed parameter regimes. Further, the effect of nonlinearity on the robustness-evolvability trade-off is ensured as long as key parameters of the system display specific relations irrespective of their absolute values. We find that within this parameter regime genotypes display low and noisy expression levels. Examining the phenotypic effects of mutations, we find an inverse correlation between robustness and evolvability that breaks only with nonlinearity in the network dynamics. Our results provide a possible solution to the robustness-evolvability trade-off, suggest an explanation for the ubiquity of nonlinear dynamics in gene expression networks, and generate useful guidelines for the design of synthetic gene circuits.

Project description:A major goal of evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo) is to understand how multicellular body plans of increasing complexity have evolved, and how the corresponding developmental programs are genetically encoded. It has been repeatedly argued that key to the evolution of increased body plan complexity is the modularity of the underlying developmental gene regulatory networks (GRNs). This modularity is considered essential for network robustness and evolvability. In our opinion, these ideas, appealing as they may sound, have not been sufficiently tested. Here we use computer simulations to study the evolution of GRNs' underlying body plan patterning. We select for body plan segmentation and differentiation, as these are considered to be major innovations in metazoan evolution. To allow modular networks to evolve, we independently select for segmentation and differentiation. We study both the occurrence and relation of robustness, evolvability and modularity of evolved networks. Interestingly, we observed two distinct evolutionary strategies to evolve a segmented, differentiated body plan. In the first strategy, first segments and then differentiation domains evolve (SF strategy). In the second scenario segments and domains evolve simultaneously (SS strategy). We demonstrate that under indirect selection for robustness the SF strategy becomes dominant. In addition, as a byproduct of this larger robustness, the SF strategy is also more evolvable. Finally, using a combined functional and architectural approach, we determine network modularity. We find that while SS networks generate segments and domains in an integrated manner, SF networks use largely independent modules to produce segments and domains. Surprisingly, we find that widely used, purely architectural methods for determining network modularity completely fail to establish this higher modularity of SF networks. Finally, we observe that, as a free side effect of evolving segmentation and differentiation in combination, we obtained in-silico developmental mechanisms resembling mechanisms used in vertebrate development.

Dataset Information

Robustness and evolvability of heterogeneous cell populations.

Publications

Robustness and evolvability of heterogeneous cell populations.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure