Dataset Information

Risk Factors for Indeterminate Outcome on Interferon Gamma Release Assay in Non-US-Born Persons Screened for Latent Tuberculosis Infection.

ABSTRACT: Non-US-born individuals account for the majority of active tuberculosis (TB) in the United States. Interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) is the preferred diagnostic test for latent TB but can produce an indeterminate result. We investigated the prevalence and predictors of an indeterminate IGRA (IND-IGRA) in a diverse cohort of non-US-born individuals and evaluated outcomes after IND-IGRA.We identified patient age ?18 years who had an outpatient IGRA between 2010 and 2017 in our health system and whose primary language was not English. We used univariate and multivariable logistic regression to examine the association of IND-IGRA with a variety of clinical factors.Of 3128 outpatients with ?1 IGRA done, 33% were Asian, 30% Hispanic, and 29% black; 44% were men, and the median age was 50 years. An initial IND-IGRA occurred in 118 (3.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1%-4.5%); notably, Asian race (55%) and rheumatologic conditions (25%) were prevalent in this group. In multivariable analysis, Asian race was independently associated with IND-IGRA (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.9; 95% CI, 1.9-4.3), in addition to the presence of anemia and hypoalbuminemia (aOR for interaction, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.3-14.3). Only 55% of patients with an initial IND-IGRA underwent repeat testing; of those who did, 66% had a determinate result.Asian race and anemia/hypoalbuminemia were independent risk factors for an indeterminate IGRA outcome in foreign-born patients screened in the United States. Our study underscores the importance of following through on indeterminate results in these key subgroups.

SUBMITTER: Sharninghausen JC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6104778 | biostudies-other | 2018 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Risk Factors for Indeterminate Outcome on Interferon Gamma Release Assay in Non-US-Born Persons Screened for Latent Tuberculosis Infection.

Sharninghausen Jody C JC Shapiro Adrienne E AE Koelle David M DM Kim H Nina HN

Open forum infectious diseases 20180727 8

<h4>Background</h4>Non-US-born individuals account for the majority of active tuberculosis (TB) in the United States. Interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) is the preferred diagnostic test for latent TB but can produce an indeterminate result. We investigated the prevalence and predictors of an indeterminate IGRA (IND-IGRA) in a diverse cohort of non-US-born individuals and evaluated outcomes after IND-IGRA.<h4>Methods</h4>We identified patient age ≥18 years who had an outpatient IGRA between 20 ...[more]

PMID: 30151410

Similar Datasets

Project description:Accurate diagnosis and subsequent treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is essential for TB elimination. However, the absence of a gold standard test for diagnosing LTBI makes assessment of the true prevalence of LTBI and the accuracy of diagnostic tests challenging. Bayesian latent class models can be used to make inferences about disease prevalence and the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests using data on the concordance between tests. We performed the largest meta-analysis to date aiming to evaluate the performance of tuberculin skin test (TST) and interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) for LTBI diagnosis in various patient populations using Bayesian latent class modelling.Systematic search of PubMeb, Embase and African Index Medicus was conducted without date and language restrictions on September 11, 2017 to identify studies that compared the performance of TST and IGRAs for LTBI diagnosis. Two IGRA methods were considered: QuantiFERON-TB Gold In Tube (QFT-GIT) and T-SPOT.TB. Studies were included if they reported 2x2 agreement data between TST and QFT-GIT or T-SPOT.TB. A Bayesian latent class model was developed to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of TST and IGRAs in various populations, including immune-competent adults, immune-compromised adults and children. A TST cut-off value of 10 mm was used for immune-competent subjects and 5 mm for immune-compromised individuals.A total of 157 studies were included in the analysis. In immune-competent adults, the sensitivity of TST and QFT-GIT were estimated to be 84% (95% credible interval [CrI] 82-85%) and 52% (50-53%), respectively. The specificity of QFT-GIT was 97% (96-97%) in non-BCG-vaccinated and 93% (92-94%) in BCG-vaccinated immune-competent adults. The estimated figures for TST were 100% (99-100%) and 79% (76-82%), respectively. T-SPOT.TB has comparable specificity (97% for both tests) and better sensitivity (68% versus 52%) than QFT-GIT in immune-competent adults. In immune-compromised adults, both TST and QFT-GIT display low sensitivity but high specificity. QFT-GIT and TST are equally specific (98% for both tests) in non-BCG-vaccinated children; however, QFT-GIT is more specific than TST (98% versus 82%) in BCG-vaccinated group. TST is more sensitive than QFT-GIT (82% versus 73%) in children.This study is the first to assess the utility of TST and IGRAs for LTBI diagnosis in different population groups using all available data with Bayesian latent class modelling. Our results challenge the current beliefs about the performance of LTBI screening tests, and have important implications for LTBI screening policy and practice. We estimated that the performance of IGRAs is not as reliable as previously measured in the general population. However, IGRAs are not or minimally affected by BCG and should be the preferred tests in this setting. Adoption of IGRAs in settings where BCG is widely administered will allow for a more accurate identification and treatment of LTBI.

Project description:Background: Interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA) are well-established immunodiagnostic tests for tuberculosis (TB) in adults. In children these tests are associated with higher rates of false-negative and indeterminate results. Age is presumed to be one factor influencing cytokine release and therefore test performance. The aim of this study was to systematically review factors associated with indeterminate IGRA results in pediatric patients. Methods: Systematic literature review guided by the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Studies reporting results of at least one commercially available IGRA (QuantiFERON-TB, T-SPOT.TB) in pediatric patient groups were included. Random effects meta-analysis was used to assess proportions of indeterminate IGRA results. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 value. Risk differences were calculated for studies comparing QuantiFERON-TB and T-SPOT.TB in the same study. Meta-regression was used to further explore the influence of study level variables on heterogeneity. Results: Of 1,293 articles screened, 133 studies were included in the final analysis. These assessed QuantiFERON-TB only in 77.4% (103/133), QuantiFERON-TB and T-SPOT.TB in 15.8% (21/133), and T-SPOT.TB only in 6.8% (9/133) resulting in 155 datasets including 107,418 participants. Overall 4% of IGRA results were indeterminate, and T-SPOT.TB (0.03, 95% CI 0.02-0.05) and QuantiFERON-TB assays (0.05, 95% CI 0.04-0.06) showed similar proportions of indeterminate results; pooled risk difference was-0.01 (95% CI -0.03 to 0.00). Significant differences with lower proportions of indeterminate assays with T-SPOT.TB compared to QuantiFERON-TB were only seen in subgroup analyses of studies performed in Africa and in non-HIV-infected immunocompromised patients. Meta-regression confirmed lower proportions of indeterminate results for T-SPOT.TB compared to QuantiFERON-TB only among studies that reported results from non-HIV-infected immunocompromised patients (p < 0.001). Conclusion: On average indeterminate IGRA results occur in 1 in 25 tests performed. Overall, there was no difference in the proportion of indeterminate results between both commercial assays. However, our findings suggest that in patients in Africa and/or patients with immunocompromising conditions other than HIV infection the T-SPOT.TB assay appears to produce fewer indeterminate results.

Project description:BackgroundThe differential diagnosis of active tuberculosis (ATB) and latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) remains challenging in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the IFN-γ/TNF-α FluoroSpot assay for differentiating ATB from LTBI.MethodsWe conducted a pilot study of case-control design, using the FluoroSpot assay to simultaneously detect IFN-γ and TNF-α secretion at the single-cell level. The frequencies of antigen-specific single TNF-α-, total TNF-α-, single IFN-γ-, total IFN-γ- and dual IFN-γ/TNF-α-secreting T cells were detected. The optimal cutoffs value of frequencies for differentiating ATB from LTBI were determined according to receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values (PV) and likelihood ratios (LR) of the FluoroSpot assay were calculated.ResultsThirty patients diagnosed microbiologically with ATB, 36 healthcare workers with LTBI and 36 healthy controls were enrolled. After stimulated by ESAT-6 or CFP-10 peptides, the median frequencies of single TNF-α-, total TNF-α-, single IFN-γ-, total IFN-γ- and dual IFN-γ/TNF-α-secreting T cells in ATB patients were all significantly higher than those in LTBI and HC groups (P < 0.01). The frequencies of total IFN-γ-secreting T cells detected by FluoroSpot assay correlated significantly with those of T-SPOT.TB (r = 0.910 for ESAT-6, P < 0.001, r = 0.845 for CFP-10, P < 0.001). After stimulated by ESAT-6 peptides, with total TNF-α-secreting T cells frequencies at a cut off value of 21 iSFCs/250,000 PBMCs, the sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, PPV, NPV of IFN-γ/TNF-α FluoroSpot assay in differentiating ATB from LTBI were 96.7% (95%CI, 82.8-99.9%), 94.3% (95%CI, 80.8-99.3%), 16.92 (95%CI, 4.40-65.08), 0.04 (95%CI, 0.01-0.24), 93.6% (95%CI,78.6-99.2%) and 97.1% (95%CI, 84.7-99.9%), respectively. With the frequencies of total TNF-α- and total IFN-γ-secreting T cells stimulated by ESAT-6 peptides combined, the specificity was increased to 97.1%, and the positive likelihood ratio to 31.5. The combination with CFP-10 might not improve the diagnostic accuracy of the ESAT-6 for differentiating ATB from LTBI.ConclusionsIFN-γ/TNF-α FluoroSpot assay might have potential to help differentiate ATB from LTBI, but the findings need to be further verified by cross-sectional or prospective cohort studies.

Project description:BackgroundWe previously reported increased unstimulated blood levels of interferon-gamma in persons with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in the United States, suggesting enhanced immune activation in LTBI. To investigate this further in a TB-endemic setting, we assessed interferon-gamma levels in persons with and without LTBI in Peru.MethodsWe analyzed data from patients with and without a recent type 1 (spontaneous) acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who were enrolled from two public hospital networks in Lima, Peru, and underwent LTBI testing using the QuantiFERON® TB Gold In-tube (QFT) assay. Participants with a positive QFT test were defined as having LTBI, whereas participants with a negative QFT test were defined as non-LTBI. Unstimulated interferon-gamma was quantified via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in the QFT nil-tube, which does not contain antigens. We compared unstimulated interferon-gamma levels between LTBI and non-LTBI groups using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. We used proportional odds modeling for multivariable analysis.ResultsData from 214 participants were included in this analysis. Of those, 120 (56%) had LTBI. There were no significant differences in age, sex and comorbidities between LTBI and non-LTBI participants, except for recent AMI that was more frequent in LTBI. LTBI participants had higher unstimulated interferon-gamma levels compared to non-LTBI participants (median, interquartile range; 14 pg/mL, 6.5-52.8 vs. 6.5 pg/mL, 4.5-15; P<0.01). LTBI remained associated with higher unstimulated interferon-gamma levels after controlling for age, sex, recent AMI, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, end stage renal disease, malignancy, obesity, and tobacco use (adjusted odds ratio, 2.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-4.9). In a sensitivity analysis that excluded participants with AMI, the association between unstimulated interferon-gamma and LTBI remained present (adjusted odds ratio; 3.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-8.2).ConclusionsLTBI was associated with higher unstimulated interferon-gamma levels. These data suggest ongoing immune activation in LTBI.

Project description:BackgroundThe Mycobacterial heparin-binding hemagglutinin (HBHA) is an important latency-associated antigen that can be used to distinguish between latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and active tuberculosis (ATB). Although many studies were explored the efficiency of the HBHA-induced interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) in different populations, the clinical differential value of HBHA-IGRA is still controversial. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether the HBHA-IGRA can be used as an efficient test for the discrimination of LTBI and ATB by a systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsRelevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library on Oct 18, 2020, with no start date limitation. The quality of each study was evaluated using Review Manager 5.4. The Stata MP v.14.0 software was used to combine sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio (LR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, and area under SROC (AUC) to evaluate the diagnostic value of HBHA-IGRA for discrimination of LTBI and ATB. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were performed for the sources of heterogeneity based on the selection criteria for active TB, the population, the TB burden, the type of antigen, the type of sample, and the time of antigen stimulation.ResultsA total of 13 studies (14 results) were included in this meta-analysis, including 603 ATB patients and 514 LTBI individuals. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the HBHA-IGRA for discrimination of the LTBI and ATB were 0.70 (95% CI, 0.57~0.80) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.71~0.84), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were 3.15 (95%CI, 2.43~4.09), 0.39 (95% CI, 0.27~0.56), and 8.11 (95% CI, 4.81~13.67), respectively. The AUC was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77~0.84). The subgroup analysis showed that the main source of heterogeneity was due to the HIV-infected population incorporated, and the different selection criteria of active TB subjects would also lead to the variation of the pooled sensitivity and specificity. Different TB burdens, HBHA antigen types, sample types, antigen stimulation time and BCG vaccination did not affect the heterogeneity in this analysis.ConclusionThe HBHA-IGRA is a promising immunodiagnostic test for discrimination of latent and active TB, which can be added in commercial IGRAs to enhance the differential diagnostic performance.

Dataset Information

Risk Factors for Indeterminate Outcome on Interferon Gamma Release Assay in Non-US-Born Persons Screened for Latent Tuberculosis Infection.

Publications

Risk Factors for Indeterminate Outcome on Interferon Gamma Release Assay in Non-US-Born Persons Screened for Latent Tuberculosis Infection.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets