Dataset Information

Improving SNP prioritization and pleiotropic architecture estimation by incorporating prior knowledge using graph-GPA.

ABSTRACT: Summary:Integration of genetic studies for multiple phenotypes is a powerful approach to improving the identification of genetic variants associated with complex traits. Although it has been shown that leveraging shared genetic basis among phenotypes, namely pleiotropy, can increase statistical power to identify risk variants, it remains challenging to effectively integrate genome-wide association study (GWAS) datasets for a large number of phenotypes. We previously developed graph-GPA, a Bayesian hierarchical model that integrates multiple GWAS datasets to boost statistical power for the identification of risk variants and to estimate pleiotropic architecture within a unified framework. Here we propose a novel improvement of graph-GPA which incorporates external knowledge about phenotype-phenotype relationship to guide the estimation of genetic correlation and the association mapping. The application of graph-GPA to GWAS datasets for 12 complex diseases with a prior disease graph obtained from a text mining of biomedical literature illustrates its power to improve the identification of risk genetic variants and to facilitate understanding of genetic relationship among complex diseases. Availability and implementation:graph-GPA is implemented as an R package 'GGPA', which is publicly available at http://dongjunchung.github.io/GGPA/. DDNet, a web interface to query diseases of interest and download a prior disease graph obtained from a text mining of biomedical literature, is publicly available at http://www.chunglab.io/ddnet/. Supplementary information:Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

SUBMITTER: Kim HJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6248798 | biostudies-other | 2018 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Improving SNP prioritization and pleiotropic architecture estimation by incorporating prior knowledge using graph-GPA.

Kim Hang J HJ Yu Zhenning Z Lawson Andrew A Zhao Hongyu H Chung Dongjun D

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 20180601 12

<h4>Summary</h4>Integration of genetic studies for multiple phenotypes is a powerful approach to improving the identification of genetic variants associated with complex traits. Although it has been shown that leveraging shared genetic basis among phenotypes, namely pleiotropy, can increase statistical power to identify risk variants, it remains challenging to effectively integrate genome-wide association study (GWAS) datasets for a large number of phenotypes. We previously developed graph-GPA, ...[more]

PMID: 29432514

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundFive main methods, commonly applied in genomic selection, were used to estimate the GEBV on the 15th QTLMAS workshop dataset: GBLUP, LASSO, Bayes A and two Bayes B type of methods (BBn and BBt). GBLUP is a mixed model approach where GEBV are obtained using a relationship matrix calculated from the SNP genotypes. The remaining methods are regression-based approaches where the SNP effects are first estimated and, then GEBV are calculated given the individuals' genotypes.MethodsThe differences between the regression-based methods are in their prior distributions for the SNP effects. The prior distribution for LASSO is a Laplace distribution, for Bayes A is a scaled Student-t distribution, and the Bayes B type methods have a Spike and Slab prior where only a proportion (?) of SNP has an effect, following a given distribution. In this study, two different distributions were considered for the Bayes B type methods: (i) normal and (ii) scaled Student-t. They are referred here as the BBn and BBt methods, respectively. These prior distributions are defined by one or more parameters controlling their scale/rate (?), shape (df) or proportion of SNP with effect (?). LASSO requires one (?); two for Bayes A (?, df) and Bayes Bn (?, ?); and three for Bayes Bt (?, df, ?). In this study, all parameters were estimated from the data. An extra scenario for Bayes A and BBt was included where df was not estimated but fixed to 4 (suffixed _4df). The implementation of GBLUP was done using ASREML, the heritability was also estimated from the data. All other methods were implemented using a MCMC approach.ResultsAll Bayes A and B methods showed accuracy (correlation between True and Estimated BV) as high as 0.94 except for BA_4df (r = 0.91). Compared to the traditional BLUP using pedigree information, these methods improved the accuracy between 50 and 55%. GBLUP and LASSO were less accurate (0.81 and 0.85 respectively) and the improvements were 34 and 40% compared to BLUP.ConclusionsResults of all methods were consistent and the accuracies for GEBV ranged between 0.81 and 0.94. When all parameters were estimated the results were similar for the Bayes A and Bayes B methods. Results showed that Bayes A was more sensitive to the changes in the shape parameter, and the parameter changes led to change in the accuracy of GEBV. However BBt was more robust to the change in this parameter. This may be explained by the fact that BBt estimates one extra parameter and it can buffer against a non-proper shape parameter.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Conventional differential gene expression analysis by methods such as student's t-test, SAM, and Empirical Bayes often searches for statistically significant genes without considering the interactions among them. Network-based approaches provide a natural way to study these interactions and to investigate the rewiring interactions in disease versus control groups. In this paper, we apply weighted graphical LASSO (wgLASSO) algorithm to integrate a data-driven network model with prior biological knowledge (i.e., protein-protein interactions) for biological network inference. We propose a novel differentially weighted graphical LASSO (dwgLASSO) algorithm that builds group-specific networks and perform network-based differential gene expression analysis to select biomarker candidates by considering their topological differences between the groups. RESULTS:Through simulation, we showed that wgLASSO can achieve better performance in building biologically relevant networks than purely data-driven models (e.g., neighbor selection, graphical LASSO), even when only a moderate level of information is available as prior biological knowledge. We evaluated the performance of dwgLASSO for survival time prediction using two microarray breast cancer datasets previously reported by Bild et al. and van de Vijver et al. Compared with the top 10 significant genes selected by conventional differential gene expression analysis method, the top 10 significant genes selected by dwgLASSO in the dataset from Bild et al. led to a significantly improved survival time prediction in the independent dataset from van de Vijver et al. Among the 10 genes selected by dwgLASSO, UBE2S, SALL2, XBP1 and KIAA0922 have been confirmed by literature survey to be highly relevant in breast cancer biomarker discovery study. Additionally, we tested dwgLASSO on TCGA RNA-seq data acquired from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on tumors samples and their corresponding non-tumorous liver tissues. Improved sensitivity, specificity and area under curve (AUC) were observed when comparing dwgLASSO with conventional differential gene expression analysis method. CONCLUSIONS:The proposed network-based differential gene expression analysis algorithm dwgLASSO can achieve better performance than conventional differential gene expression analysis methods by integrating information at both gene expression and network topology levels. The incorporation of prior biological knowledge can lead to the identification of biologically meaningful genes in cancer biomarker studies.

Dataset Information

Improving SNP prioritization and pleiotropic architecture estimation by incorporating prior knowledge using graph-GPA.

Publications

Improving SNP prioritization and pleiotropic architecture estimation by incorporating prior knowledge using graph-GPA.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets