Dataset Information

Effect of the prior distribution of SNP effects on the estimation of total breeding value.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Five main methods, commonly applied in genomic selection, were used to estimate the GEBV on the 15th QTLMAS workshop dataset: GBLUP, LASSO, Bayes A and two Bayes B type of methods (BBn and BBt). GBLUP is a mixed model approach where GEBV are obtained using a relationship matrix calculated from the SNP genotypes. The remaining methods are regression-based approaches where the SNP effects are first estimated and, then GEBV are calculated given the individuals' genotypes.

Methods

The differences between the regression-based methods are in their prior distributions for the SNP effects. The prior distribution for LASSO is a Laplace distribution, for Bayes A is a scaled Student-t distribution, and the Bayes B type methods have a Spike and Slab prior where only a proportion (?) of SNP has an effect, following a given distribution. In this study, two different distributions were considered for the Bayes B type methods: (i) normal and (ii) scaled Student-t. They are referred here as the BBn and BBt methods, respectively. These prior distributions are defined by one or more parameters controlling their scale/rate (?), shape (df) or proportion of SNP with effect (?). LASSO requires one (?); two for Bayes A (?, df) and Bayes Bn (?, ?); and three for Bayes Bt (?, df, ?). In this study, all parameters were estimated from the data. An extra scenario for Bayes A and BBt was included where df was not estimated but fixed to 4 (suffixed _4df). The implementation of GBLUP was done using ASREML, the heritability was also estimated from the data. All other methods were implemented using a MCMC approach.

Results

All Bayes A and B methods showed accuracy (correlation between True and Estimated BV) as high as 0.94 except for BA_4df (r = 0.91). Compared to the traditional BLUP using pedigree information, these methods improved the accuracy between 50 and 55%. GBLUP and LASSO were less accurate (0.81 and 0.85 respectively) and the improvements were 34 and 40% compared to BLUP.

Conclusions

Results of all methods were consistent and the accuracies for GEBV ranged between 0.81 and 0.94. When all parameters were estimated the results were similar for the Bayes A and Bayes B methods. Results showed that Bayes A was more sensitive to the changes in the shape parameter, and the parameter changes led to change in the accuracy of GEBV. However BBt was more robust to the change in this parameter. This may be explained by the fact that BBt estimates one extra parameter and it can buffer against a non-proper shape parameter.

SUBMITTER: Nadaf J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3363160 | biostudies-literature | 2012 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effect of the prior distribution of SNP effects on the estimation of total breeding value.

Nadaf Javad J Riggio Valentina V Yu Tun-Ping TP Pong-Wong Ricardo R

BMC proceedings 20120521

<h4>Background</h4>Five main methods, commonly applied in genomic selection, were used to estimate the GEBV on the 15th QTLMAS workshop dataset: GBLUP, LASSO, Bayes A and two Bayes B type of methods (BBn and BBt). GBLUP is a mixed model approach where GEBV are obtained using a relationship matrix calculated from the SNP genotypes. The remaining methods are regression-based approaches where the SNP effects are first estimated and, then GEBV are calculated given the individuals' genotypes.<h4>Meth ...[more]

PMID: 22640730

Similar Datasets

Project description:Breeding cassava relies on several selection stages (single row trial-SRT; preliminary; advanced; and uniform yield trials-UYT). This study uses data from 14 years of evaluations. From more than 20,000 genotypes initially evaluated only 114 reached the last stage. The objective was to assess how the data at SRT could be used to predict the probabilities of genotypes reaching the UYT. Phenotypic data from each genotype at SRT was integrated into the selection index (SIN) used by the cassava breeding program. Average SIN from all the progenies derived from each progenitor was then obtained. Average SIN is an approximation of the breeding value of each progenitor. Data clearly suggested that some genotypes were better progenitors than others (e.g., high number of their progenies reaching the UYT), suggesting important variation in breeding values of progenitors. However, regression of average SIN of each parental genotype on the number of their respective progenies reaching UYT resulted in a negligible coefficient of determination (r (2) = 0.05). Breeding value (e.g., average SIN) at SRT was not efficient predicting which genotypes were more likely to reach the UYT stage. Number of families and progenies derived from a given progenitor were more efficient predicting the probabilities of the progeny from a given parent reaching the UYT stage. Large within-family genetic variation tends to mask the true breeding value of each progenitor. The use of partially inbred progenitors (e.g., S1 or S2 genotypes) would reduce the within-family genetic variation thus making the assessment of breeding value more accurate. Moreover, partial inbreeding of progenitors can improve the breeding value of the original (S0) parental material and sharply accelerate genetic gains. For instance, homozygous S1 genotypes for the dominant resistance to cassava mosaic disease (CMD) could be generated and selected. All gametes from these selected S1 genotypes would carry the desirable allele and 100% of their progenies would be resistant. Only half the gametes produced by the heterozygous S0 progenitor would carry the allele of interest. For other characteristics, progenies from the S1 genotypes should be, at worst, similar to those generated by the S0 progenitors.

Project description:A combined matrix that exploits genealogy together with marker-based information could improve the selection of elite individuals in breeding programs. We present genetic parameters for adaptive and growth traits in beef cattle by exploring linear combinations of pedigree-based (A) and marker-based (G) relationship matrices. We use a data set with 2,111 Brahman (BB) and 2,550 Tropical Composite (TC) cattle with genotypes for 729,068 SNP, and phenotypes for five traits. A weighted relationship matrix (WRM) combining G and A was constructed as WRM = ?G + (1 - ?)A. The weight (?) was explored at values from 0.0 to 1.0, at 0.1 intervals. Additionally, four alternative G matrices, in the WRM, were evaluated according to the selection of SNP used to generate them: 1) Gw: all autosomal SNP with minor allele frequency (MAF) > 1%; 2) Gg: autosomal SNP with MAF > 1% and mapped inside to gene coding regions; 3) Gp: autosomal SNP with MAF > 1% and previously reported to have significant pleiotropic effect in these two populations; and 4) Gc: autosomal SNP with MAF > 1% and with significant correlated effects previously reported in both BB and TC populations. In addition, two A matrices were evaluated: 1) A: all relationships between animals were considered after tracing back known ancestors; and 2) Ad: a distorted A matrix where a random 1% of the off-diagonal nonzero values were set to zero to simulate relationship errors. Five independent Ad matrices were explored each with a different random 1% of relationships masked. Criteria for comparing the resulting WRM included estimates of heritability (h2) and cross-validation accuracy (ACC) of genomic estimated breeding values. The choice of WRM had a greater impact on h2 than on ACC estimates. The 1% errors introduced in pedigree relationships generated large distortion in genetic parameters and ACC estimates. However, employing a ? > 0.7 was an efficient mechanism to compensate for the errors in A. Additionally, although significant (P-value < 0.0001), we found no consistent relationship between the type of SNP used to compute G and h2 or ACC estimates. We devised the optimal value of ? for maximum h2 and ACC at ? = 0.7 suggesting a 70% and 30% weighting to genomic and genealogical information, respectively, as an optimal strategy to compensate for pedigree errors, to improve genetic parameters estimates and lead to more accurate selection decisions.

Dataset Information

Effect of the prior distribution of SNP effects on the estimation of total breeding value.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Effect of the prior distribution of SNP effects on the estimation of total breeding value.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets