Dataset Information

Mitotic antipairing of homologous and sex chromosomes via spatial restriction of two haploid sets.

ABSTRACT: Pairing homologous chromosomes is required for recombination. However, in nonmeiotic stages it can lead to detrimental consequences, such as allelic misregulation and genome instability, and is rare in human somatic cells. How mitotic recombination is prevented-and how genetic stability is maintained across daughter cells-is a fundamental, unanswered question. Here, we report that both human and mouse cells impede homologous chromosome pairing by keeping two haploid chromosome sets apart throughout mitosis. Four-dimensional analysis of chromosomes during cell division revealed that a haploid chromosome set resides on either side of a meridional plane, crossing two centrosomes. Simultaneous tracking of chromosome oscillation and the spindle axis, using fluorescent CENP-A and centrin1, respectively, demonstrates collective genome behavior/segregation of two haploid sets throughout mitosis. Using 3D chromosome imaging of a translocation mouse with a supernumerary chromosome, we found that this maternally derived chromosome is positioned by parental origin. These data, taken together, support the identity of haploid sets by parental origin. This haploid set-based antipairing motif is shared by multiple cell types, doubles in tetraploid cells, and is lost in a carcinoma cell line. The data support a mechanism of nuclear polarity that sequesters two haploid sets along a subcellular axis. This topological segregation of haploid sets revisits an old model/paradigm and provides implications for maintaining mitotic fidelity.

SUBMITTER: Hua LL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6310853 | biostudies-other | 2018 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Mitotic antipairing of homologous and sex chromosomes via spatial restriction of two haploid sets.

Hua Lisa L LL Mikawa Takashi T

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 20181210 52

Pairing homologous chromosomes is required for recombination. However, in nonmeiotic stages it can lead to detrimental consequences, such as allelic misregulation and genome instability, and is rare in human somatic cells. How mitotic recombination is prevented-and how genetic stability is maintained across daughter cells-is a fundamental, unanswered question. Here, we report that both human and mouse cells impede homologous chromosome pairing by keeping two haploid chromosome sets apart through ...[more]

PMID: 30530674

Similar Datasets

Project description:To date, research on the evolution of sex chromosomes has focused on sexually antagonistic selection among diploids, which has been shown to be a potent driver of the strata and reduced recombination that characterize many sex chromosomes. However, significant selection can also occur on haploid genotypes during less conspicuous life cycle stages, e.g., competition among sperm/pollen or meiotic drive during gamete/spore production. These haploid selective processes are typically sex-specific, e.g., gametic/gametophytic competition typically occurs among sperm/pollen, and meiotic drive typically occurs during either spermatogenesis or oogenesis. We use models to investigate whether sex-specific selection on haploids could drive the evolution of recombination suppression on the sex chromosomes, as has been demonstrated for sex-specific selection among diploids. A potential complication is that zygotic sex-ratios become biased when haploid selected loci become linked to the sex-determining region because the zygotic sex ratio is determined by the relative number and fitness of X- vs. Y-bearing sperm. Despite causing biased zygotic sex-ratios, we find that a period of sex-specific haploid selection generally favors recombination suppression on the sex chromosomes. Suppressed recombination is favored because it allows associations to build up between haploid-beneficial alleles and the sex that experiences haploid selection most often (e.g., pollen beneficial alleles become strongly associated with the male determining region, Y or Z). Haploid selected loci can favor recombination suppression even in the absence of selective differences between male and female diploids. Overall, we expand our view of the sex-specific life cycle stages that can drive sex chromosome evolution to include gametic competition and meiotic drive. Based on our models, sex chromosomes should become enriched for genes that experience haploid selection, as is expected for genes that experience sexually antagonistic selection. Thus, we generate a number of predictions that can be evaluated in emerging sex chromosome systems.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Chromatin-modifying reagents that alter histone associating proteins, DNA conformation or its sequence are well established strategies for studying chromatin structure in interphase (G1, S, G2). Little is known about how these compounds act during metaphase. We assessed the effects of these reagents at genomic loci that show reproducible, non-random differences in accessibility to chromatin that distinguish homologous targets by single copy DNA probe fluorescence in situ hybridization (scFISH). By super-resolution 3-D structured illumination microscopy (3D-SIM) and other criteria, the differences correspond to 'differential accessibility' (DA) to these chromosomal regions. At these chromosomal loci, DA of the same homologous chromosome is stable and epigenetic hallmarks of less accessible interphase chromatin are present. RESULTS:To understand the basis for DA, we investigate the impact of epigenetic modifiers on these allelic differences in chromatin accessibility between metaphase homologs in lymphoblastoid cell lines. Allelic differences in metaphase chromosome accessibility represent a stable chromatin mark on mitotic metaphase chromosomes. Inhibition of the topoisomerase II?-DNA cleavage complex reversed DA. Inter-homolog probe fluorescence intensity ratios between chromosomes treated with ICRF-193 were significantly lower than untreated controls. 3D-SIM demonstrated that differences in hybridized probe volume and depth between allelic targets were equalized by this treatment. By contrast, DA was impervious to chromosome decondensation treatments targeting histone modifying enzymes, cytosine methylation, as well as in cells with regulatory defects in chromatid cohesion. These data altogether suggest that DA is a reflection of allelic differences in metaphase chromosome compaction, dictated by the localized catenation state of the chromosome, rather than by other epigenetic marks. CONCLUSIONS:Inhibition of the topoisomerase II?-DNA cleavage complex mitigated DA by decreasing DNA superhelicity and axial metaphase chromosome condensation. This has potential implications for the mechanism of preservation of cellular phenotypes that enables the same chromatin structure to be correctly reestablished in progeny cells of the same tissue or individual.

Dataset Information

Mitotic antipairing of homologous and sex chromosomes via spatial restriction of two haploid sets.

Publications

Mitotic antipairing of homologous and sex chromosomes via spatial restriction of two haploid sets.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure