Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

12 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Evaluation of the efficacy of motorized spiral enteroscope in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in cases with difficulty of intubation or poor maneuverability

ABSTRACT: Primary outcome(s): Completion rate of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)

DISEASE(S): Early Stage Colorectal Cancer

PROVIDER: 104537 | ecrin-mdr-crc |

REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Registry

Project description:This is a patient registry for all cases of pre-neoplastic or early neoplastic digestive tract lesions treated with curative intention by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique.

| 91704 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Brief Title : Optimized Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection With Snaring for Colorectal Neoplasm

Project description:This study is aimed to analyze the outcomes after conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and optimized ESD with snaring (oESD-S) for colorectal neoplasm that is more than 20 mm in diameter of laterllay spreading tumor or flat elevated lesion without stalk. Optimized ESD with snaring means submucosal dissection followed by snaring when narrowed circumference of the remained submucosal tissue beneath the lesion is less than 5 mm in diameter with snaring, then resected by using an electric current. The investigators expect optimized ESD with snaring can provide more time-saving procedure with comparable en-bloc resection rate and perforation rate, when compared with the conventional ESD method.

| 2151761 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Prospective, Consecutive, Single-Center Study Western (Greek) Single-Center Experience of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) for Early Gastrointestinal Neoplasia. That is really possible in a Greek General Hospital.

Project description:Interventions: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) Primary outcome(s): Endoscopic ’en bloc’ and complete pathological R0 resection. Study Design: Single arm Non-randomized

| 2624630 | ecrin-mdr-crc

A randomized controlled trial on the usefulness of underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus conventional ESD for colorectal tumors

Project description:Interventions: Underwater ESD group Conventional ESD group Primary outcome(s): Dissection speed Study Design: Parallel Randomized

| 2653414 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Evaluation of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) Efficacy

Project description:Superficial rectal tumors could be removed by ESD with two major advantages showed by the literature: high rate of monobloc resection and R0 resection. Hence, recurrence rate was lower than ERM therapy. This technique is actually performed routinely in Japan and experience is limited in Europe, with few data in the literature. This study is suggested to patients with superficial medium or distal rectal tumors. The lesion was identified and demarcated using white-light endoscopy, magnifying endoscopy, and chromoendoscopy. Then, marking around the lesions was performed. Local injection was made using injection needle, and then mucosal incision was performed around the lesion using endo-knives. Submucosal dissection was performed using endo-knives. Hemostasis and vessel coagulation were practiced using primary hemostatic forceps during the procedure. Follow-up is one year. For lesion with invasive carcinoma (vessel and lymphatic involvement, undifferentiated, free margin less than 1 mm), a surgical resection is performed. All the patients have an endoscopic control 3 months after ESD (rectosigmoidoscopy with biopsies): * For complete resection, an endoscopic control was performed at 1 year. * For incomplete resection, another endoscopic therapy was attempted (EMR) an endoscopic control was performed at 1 year. At one year, patient with incomplete resection have a surgical resection.

| 2146818 | ecrin-mdr-crc

To investigate the standard programme of endoscopic submucosal tunnelling (ESDTT) and conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the treatment of early esophagus, stomach, colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions

Project description:Interventions: Group 1:endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection;Group 2:Routine endoscopic submucosal dissection Primary outcome(s): En bloc dissection;R0 resection rate;curative resection rate;Dissection speed Study Design: Non randomized control

| 2669338 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Endoscopic resection for laterally spreading tumor (LST) -(endoscopic submucosal dissecion (ESD) vs. endoscopic mucosal resection)-

Project description:Interventions: Group A. ESD group 1. The solution of a mixture of Glyceol and 1% 1900-KDa hyaluronic acid preparation is injected into the submucosal layer. 2. Mucosal incision is started with the knife for ESD. 3. The lesion is resected with submucosal dissection. Group B. EMR group 1. The solution of normal saline is injected into the submucosal layer. 2. The lesion is resected with an electrosurgical snare. Primary outcome(s): the incidence of local recurrence after endoscopic resection Study Design: Parallel Randomized

| 2616263 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Endoscopic submucosal dissection with an additional working channel (ESD+): a novel technique to improve procedure time and safety of ESD.

Project description:Background and aimsA new external additional working channel (AWC) was recently introduced by which endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be converted to a technique termed "ESD+ ". We aim to systematically evaluate this novel technique in flat gastric lesions and compare it to classical ESD.MethodsThe study was prospectively conducted in a pre-clinical ex vivo animal model (EASIE-R simulator) with porcine stomachs. Prior to intervention, we set standardized lesions measuring 3 cm or 4 cm in antegrade as well as in retrograde positions.ResultsOverall, 64 procedures were performed by an experienced endoscopist. Both techniques were reliable and showed en bloc resection rates of 100%. Overall, ESD+ reduced time of procedure compared to ESD (24.5 vs. 32.5 min, p = 0.025*). Particularly, ESD+ was significantly faster in retrograde lesions with a median of 22.5 vs. 34.0 min in 3 cm retrograde lesions (p = 0.002*) and 34.5 vs. 41.0 min (p = 0.011*) in 4 cm retrograde lesions. There were 0 perforations with both techniques. In ESD+ , 1 muscularis damage occurred (3.13%) compared to 6 muscularis damages with ESD (18.75%, p = 0.045*).ConclusionsBy its grasp-and-mobilize technique, ESD+ allows potentially faster and safer resections of flat gastric lesions compared to conventional ESD in an ex vivo porcine model. The potential advantages of ESD+ in terms of procedure time may be particularly relevant for difficult lesions in retrograde positions.

| S-EPMC8195965 | biostudies-literature

Feasibility study investigating the efficacy and safety of hybeid endoscopic submucosal dissection

Project description:Interventions: Patients with 20-30mm colorectal adenoma/intramucosal cancer were considered eligible. Hybrid ESD was performed using newly-developed device which enable scircumferential incision and submucosal dissection. Primary outcome(s): Complication rate assessed after endoscopic treatment Study Design: Single arm Non-randomized

| 2637804 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Prospective cohort study to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and long prognosis of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumor

Project description:Interventions: Eendoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumor Primary outcome(s): Prevalence of complete en bloc resection, complication and prognosis in patients with colorectal ESD Study Design: Single arm Non-randomized

| 2625546 | ecrin-mdr-crc

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data