Does the Recall by the General Practitioner Improve Patients’ Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening?
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
DISEASE(S): Colorectal Cancer,Colorectal Neoplasms
PROVIDER: 2101016 | ecrin-mdr-crc |
REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR
Similar Datasets
Project description:The propose of this study is to assess the effect of general practitioner’s involvement on first patients’ solicitation in screening for colorectal cancer by testing for faecal occult blood (FOBT).
| 2101012 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Intervention 1: the use of a bowel cancer screening invitation letter to that contains photographs of 2 previous screenees who were diagnosed with early bowel cancer through their participation in a bowel cancer screening program, and with simple program advocacy statements from them.
Intervention 2: the use of a bowel cancer screening invitation letter that contains enhanced positive framing and generalised risk messages.
Primary outcome(s): Completion of faecal immunochemical test within 12 weeks of offer[]
Study Design: Purpose: Prevention; Allocation: Randomised controlled trial; Masking: Blinded (masking used);Assignment: Parallel;Type of endpoint: Efficacy
| 2452101 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Participation in a primary screening colonoscopy programs remains low. Advanced notification letter has been shown to increase participation in colorectal cancer screening with fecal occult blood testing and to be cost effective compared to standard invitation. It is unknown whether advanced notification letter increases participation rate in primary colonoscopy screening program.
We hypothesize that an Advance Notification Letter will have significant influence on participation in screening colonoscopy, comparing to standard invitation procedure and will thus result in higher efficiency of the program.
This randomized controlled study aims to compare the participation rate in screening colonoscopy in response to advanced notification plus standard invitation letter and standard invitation letter alone.
Material and methods: 6800 individuals aged 55-64 years will be drawn from the Population Registry and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the group invited for screening colonoscopy with advanced notification letter (send two weeks before standard invitation) plus standard invitation (send six weeks before planned screening colonoscopy) or to standard invitation only (send six weeks before planned screening colonoscopy). The sample size was calculated to detect 3% difference in participation rate between the groups (25% vs 28%) with 80% power.
| 2170464 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Objective: To assess the effectiveness of a brief telephone intervention added to an post invitation letter in the participation rate to a colorectal cancer screening program.
Methods: Randomized controlled trial. This study is framed inside the colorectal cancer screening program of Catalonia, concretely in the region of Vallès Occidental. This program is directed to men and women from 50 to 69 years. The screening test used is the fecal immunological test (FIT) that is offered every 2 years. If the screening test is positive, a colonoscopy with sedation is offered as a diagnostic test.
| 2238984 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:The aim of this project is to assess the impact on health and economics of the implementation of text messaging (SMS) in cancer screening programs. Three interventions with SMS will be evaluated through community trials. In the colorectal cancer screening program the following interventions will be tested: a) Participation reminder: six weeks after sending the invitation letter of the colorectal cancer program if there has not been a response, a reminder SMS will be sent in front of the usual method by letter; b) Reminder to return the fecal occult blood test: SMS reminder of test delivery versus no intervention. This reminder will be sent to the individuals who have gone to the pharmacy to pick up a fecal occult blood test and they have not returned it after 14 days. The impact on participation will be analyzed and, if applicable, the proportion of advanced neoplasms will be calculated by increase in participation. In the breast cancer screening program, the invitation by SMS versus the usual invitation by letter will be studied in women who had participated in the previous screening round. The impact on participation will be analyzed. A cost-effectiveness analysis of the three interventions will be carried out. The incremental cost ratio of the interventions between cost variation and effectiveness variation will be calculated.
| 2335819 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Interventions: Name of intervention: gender specific mail-administered screening invitation strategies.
All participants will receive an offer to participate in a free FOBT which will be delivered by mail. Intervention arms will differ from control according to the information included in the materials accompanying the screening offer. All study participants will receive a standard screening reminder irrespective of their intervention group. Intervention materials will target specific psychosocial variables previously identified as being related to male participation in FOBT screening.
The intervention period is 14 weeks. All participants will receive a screening offer according to the following timeline.
Baseline: Advance notification letter sent
Week two: Invitation package sent
Week eight: Reminder letters sent to those who have not completed an FOBT
Week 14: Data collection ceases.
Arm 1: Control
The control arm will receive a standard offer to participate in FOBT screening designed to mimic the strategy utilised by the Australian national bowel cancer screening program (NBCSP).
The standard offer includes an advance notification letter and a screening invitation package.
The advance notification letter is sent two weeks prior to the screening invitation package and is designed to alert participants that an invitation to screen for CRC with an FOBT will soon follow. The standard advance notification letter introduces basic information about colorectal cancer and the health benefits of screening.
The screening invitation package includes a) a screening invitation letter b) an immunochemical FOBT with associated instructions c) an information booklet that describes colorectal cancer and screening and d) a particip
Primary outcome(s): Rate of FOBT participation per trial arm as assessed by number of FOBT screening tests returned.[At 14 weeks from baseline, 12 weeks after receiving the FOBT.]
Study Design: Purpose: Prevention; Allocation: Randomised controlled trial; Masking: Blinded (masking used);Assignment: Factorial;Type of endpoint: Efficacy
| 2458819 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Interventions: The aim is to determine the value of GP endorsement for faecal occult blood test based re-screening colorectal cancer. The interventions are conducted within the setting of a population screening program where invitees are recruited from general practice patient lists.
Intervention 1: Invitation letter to re-screen on central screening facility letterhead with statement from invitee’s general practice endorsing participation in screening, signed by screening coordinator.
Intervention 2: Invitation letter to rescreen on practice letterhead with statement from practice endorsing screening, signed by invitee’s general practitioner.
Comparison group: recruited from electoral roll receiving control invitation to rescreen.
Duration: Four annual rounds of screening offers.
All people received the same invitation type over the 4 rounds of screening invitations.
Primary outcome(s): Paricipation in screening defined as return of a screening kit 12 weeks from offer.[]
Study Design: Purpose: Prevention; Allocation: Randomised controlled trial; Masking: Blinded (masking used);Assignment: Parallel;Type of endpoint: Efficacy
| 2452278 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Background and study aims
While colorectal cancer (CRC) screening can detect cancer at an early stage, participation in CRC screening programmes is often below recommended levels. In order to be effective, CRC screening programs high participation. There is therefore an interest in studying possible interventions to achieve high participation. While interventions such as pre-notification letters, tailored reminder letters and telephone contact can increase participation, they are often too costly for the screening programmes. Interventions based on behavioural economics only manipulate the decision setting and are therefore potentially cost-neutral. The aim of this study is to test whether messages derived from behavioral economics can increase participation in the context of the Cypriot pilot program for colorectal cancer screening.
Who can participate?
All residents aged 50-69 years who are eligible for colorectal cancer screening.
What does the study involve?
In the first study participants are randomly allocated to receive the standard invitation letter with one of six additional behavioral economics-based messages included, or the standard invitation letter with no manipulation. The additional behavioural economics-based messages are built on the following principles: (1) social responsibility to look after own health, (2) anticipated regret of non-attendance, (3) financial opportunity costs of non-attendance, (4) benefit of early detection, (5) limited duration of the offer and (6) social norms. In the second study participants are randomly allocated to receive either the standard invitation letter with the most effective message from the first study, or the standard invitation letter with no manipulation.
| 2412318 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Our goal is to evaluate, in France, the effectiveness (in terms of participation) of the general practitioner involvement (signature) and a more personalized communication in invitation letters to organized screening of breast, colorectal and cervical cancers.
The hypothesis on which this project is based is that communication is probably more effective if the "receiver" feels personally targeted by invitation letters (Dear Martin, I am writing ...) and if he knows "the issuer "(his general practitioner rather an unknown person).
| 2184108 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:The role of ECF sigma factors PG0162, PG01660 were involved in virulence regulationin Porphyromonas gingivalis was published Yuetan Dou, Devon Osbourne, Rachelle McKenzie, Hansel M Fletcher. (2010) Involvement of extracytoplasmic function sigma factors in virulence regulation in Porphyromonas gingivalis W83. FEMS Microbiology Letter, 312(1):24-32.
2017-09-14 | GSE103739 | GEO