Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Oral Iohexol for Fecal/Fluid Tagging for CT Colonography: A Study to Improve Image Quality by Preventing Colonic Bubbles

ABSTRACT: To determine whether colonic bubbles associated with CT colonography performed with iohexol for fecal/fluid tagging could be reduced by adding simethicone to the standard cathartic preparation.

DISEASE(S): Colorectal Neoplasms

PROVIDER: 2139959 | ecrin-mdr-crc |

REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

MR Colonography With Fecal Tagging. Barium vs. BariumFerumoxsil

Project description:The purpose of this study is to determine whether Barium or BariumFerumoxsil is better for fecal tagging in MR colonography. Patients referred to colonoscopy are offered MR colonography before colonoscopy. Two days before colonography, patients ingest either a contrast agent A (200 ml Barium sulphate solution 1g/ml)) four times a day or a 200 ml contrast agent B (Barium sulfate(25%) and Ferumoxil(75%)) four times a day, which will render fecal masses "invisible" on the following MR colonography. The patients are randomised to either contrast agent A or B. The examinations are evaluated by two independent blinded readers, who will rate the tagging quality of the contrast agents. The quality of tagging will be rated by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Relative contrast (ReCon = Iwall - Ilumen/ Iwall + Ilumen).

| 2029447 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Magnetic Resonance (MR) Colonography With Fecal Tagging

Project description:The purpose of this study is to determine if MR colonography with fecal tagging is better using air or water for distension of the colon. Patients referred to colonoscopy are offered MR colonography before colonoscopy. Two days before colonography, patients ingest a 200 ml Barium sulfate solution 2% four times a day, which will render fecal masses "invisible" on the following MR colonography. Air or water (randomised trial) is used for distension of the colon. The examinations are evaluated by two independent blinded readers.

| 2013099 | ecrin-mdr-crc

A controlled study of efficacy and safety in CT colonography preparation with Mosapride Citrate Hydrate

Project description:Interventions: Polyethylene glycol lavage solution plus contrast medium (PEG-C) preparation before CT colonography Polyethylene glycol lavage solution plus contrast medium and Mosapride Citrate Hydrate (PEG-CM) preparation before CT colonography Primary outcome(s): PEG-C versus PEG-C + Mosapride Citrate Hydrate for bowel preparation before CT colonography to be asscessed by the amount of residual fluid. Study Design: Parallel Randomized

| 2620536 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Pulse Pressure Variation Based Intraoperative Fluid Management Versus Traditional Fluid Management for Colonic Cancer Patients Undergoing Mass Resection and Anastomosis

Project description:pulse pressure variation based intraoperative fluid therapy versus traditional fluid therapy for colonic cancer patients undergoing mass resection and anastomosis for maintaining adequate hydration without complications.

| 2745341 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Human fetal chylothorax: pleural fluid vs. ascites fluid

Project description:Transcriptional profile comparison of the pleural and ascites fluids in hydropic fetuses affected with chylothorax. Two-condition experiment, pleural fluid vs. ascites fluid. Comparison of the transcriptional profile between sample collected before and after OK-432 treatment and between fetuses with and without a G404S mutation in the ITGA9 gene

2012-12-31 | E-GEOD-33872 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Increasing Navigation Speed at Endoluminal CT Colonography Reduces Colonic Visualization and Polyp Identification.

Project description:Purpose To investigate the effect of increasing navigation speed on the visual search and decision making during polyp identification for computed tomography (CT) colonography Materials and Methods Institutional review board permission was obtained to use deidentified CT colonography data for this prospective reader study. After obtaining informed consent from the readers, 12 CT colonography fly-through examinations that depicted eight polyps were presented at four different fixed navigation speeds to 23 radiologists. Speeds ranged from 1 cm/sec to 4.5 cm/sec. Gaze position was tracked by using an infrared eye tracker, and readers indicated that they saw a polyp by clicking a mouse. Patterns of searching and decision making by speed were investigated graphically and by multilevel modeling. Results Readers identified polyps correctly in 56 of 77 (72.7%) of viewings at the slowest speed but in only 137 of 225 (60.9%) of viewings at the fastest speed (P = .004). They also identified fewer false-positive features at faster speeds (42 of 115; 36.5%) of videos at slowest speed, 89 of 345 (25.8%) at fastest, P = .02). Gaze location was highly concentrated toward the central quarter of the screen area at faster speeds (mean gaze points at slowest speed vs fastest speed, 86% vs 97%, respectively). Conclusion Faster navigation speed at endoluminal CT colonography led to progressive restriction of visual search patterns. Greater speed also reduced both true-positive and false-positive colorectal polyp identification. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

| S-EPMC5548448 | biostudies-literature

Cerebrospinal fluid

Project description:Cerebrospinal fluid Genome sequencing

| PRJNA856347 | ENA

Distributed human intelligence for colonic polyp classification in computer-aided detection for CT colonography.

Project description:PurposeTo assess the diagnostic performance of distributed human intelligence for the classification of polyp candidates identified with computer-aided detection (CAD) for computed tomographic (CT) colonography.Materials and methodsThis study was approved by the institutional Office of Human Subjects Research. The requirement for informed consent was waived for this HIPAA-compliant study. CT images from 24 patients, each with at least one polyp of 6 mm or larger, were analyzed by using CAD software to identify 268 polyp candidates. Twenty knowledge workers (KWs) from a crowdsourcing platform labeled each polyp candidate as a true or false polyp. Two trials involving 228 KWs were conducted to assess reproducibility. Performance was assessed by comparing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of KWs with the AUC of CAD for polyp classification.ResultsThe detection-level AUC for KWs was 0.845 ± 0.045 (standard error) in trial 1 and 0.855 ± 0.044 in trial 2. These were not significantly different from the AUC for CAD, which was 0.859 ± 0.043. When polyp candidates were stratified by difficulty, KWs performed better than CAD on easy detections; AUCs were 0.951 ± 0.032 in trial 1, 0.966 ± 0.027 in trial 2, and 0.877 ± 0.048 for CAD (P = .039 for trial 2). KWs who participated in both trials showed a significant improvement in performance going from trial 1 to trial 2; AUCs were 0.759 ± 0.052 in trial 1 and 0.839 ± 0.046 in trial 2 (P = .041).ConclusionThe performance of distributed human intelligence is not significantly different from that of CAD for colonic polyp classification.

| S-EPMC3285221 | biostudies-literature

rumen fluid

Project description:rumen fluid Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA877011 | ENA

Ruminal fluid

Project description:Ruminal fluid Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA777387 | ENA