Dataset Information

Minimally Invasive Right Colectomy Anastomosis Study

ABSTRACT: Right colectomy (hemicolectomy) involves the removal of the cecum, the ascending colon, the hepatic flexure, the first one-third of the transverse colon, part of the terminal ileum, and the associated regional fat and lymph nodes, and is the accepted treatment for malignant neoplasms of the right colon. A minimally invasive approach is commonly used for right colectomy, with studies reporting reduced complications, less blood loss, and hospital stay when compared to an open approach. However, there remains controversy regarding whether robotic assistance is advantageous for this technique and whether an intracorporeal (ICA) or extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA) is best. MIRCAST is a prospective, observational, international, multi-center, 4-parallel-cohorts study. Sites or surgeons will select a cohort of the study for which they are qualified. Four cohorts will be the subject of study: 1. Robotic Right Colectomy with ICA 2. Robotic Right Colectomy with ECA 3. Laparoscopic Right Colectomy with ICA 4. Laparoscopic Right Colectomy with ECA All patient assessments will be done according to the sites standard of care. Parameters routinely recorded during right colectomy surgery will be collected prospectively. Enrolled subjects will undergo assessments at the following intervals: pre-operative, operative, discharge, 30 days, 3 months, 1 year and 2 years post-surgery.

DISEASE(S): Colorectal Cancer,Anastomotic Complication,Colorectal Neoplasms,Colectomy

PROVIDER: 2282553 | ecrin-mdr-crc |

REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Sacrocolpopexy has been dubbed the âgold standardâ repair for apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP). This study sought to determine a genetic cause for sacrocolpopexy failure by comparing genotypes from 10 women who suffered from early POP reoccurance after sacrocolpopexy surgery, versus 40 randomly selected women with long term success after the same procedure. We objectively defined early overt failure after robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as having a pelvic organ prolapse quantification system examination (POP-Q) of stage III or IV occurring in more than one compartment within six months after surgery. All medical records identified during this process were then reviewed by a panel of urogynecology attendings and fellows to select patients who were truly clinical outliers. By this method we identified 10 patients (cases) who experienced early overt surgical failure. We also randomly selected 40 controls from our research database which includes greater than 500 patients who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy during the same time period and had been objectively and subjectively assessed for â¥ 12 months with surgical success at â¥ 12 months that did not undergo prolapse re-operation or re-treatment. Demographics and peri-operative details were compared between cases and controls. Exclusion criteria for controls included use of other graft material besides polypropylene mesh, prior surgery for prolapse involving graft material, and conversion to laparotomy. DNA from the 10 cases and 40 controls was isolated from buccal swabs and genotyped on a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array that contains 250,000 markers (NspI 250K SNP array, Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). All women in this study identified as Caucasian. All subjects provided written informed consent to study participation and data release. This was a case-control study approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Atlantic Health System in Morristown New Jersey (R11-10-004). This case-control study compared single genotypes of 10 cases to 40 controls. All subjects were identified as Caucasian. Cases were women who experienced early overt POP recurrence after robotic sacrocolpopexy, and controls were randomly selected women with long term success after the same procedure.

Project description:Sacrocolpopexy has been dubbed the “gold standard” repair for apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP). This study sought to determine a genetic cause for sacrocolpopexy failure by comparing genotypes from 10 women who suffered from early POP reoccurance after sacrocolpopexy surgery, versus 40 randomly selected women with long term success after the same procedure. We objectively defined early overt failure after robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as having a pelvic organ prolapse quantification system examination (POP-Q) of stage III or IV occurring in more than one compartment within six months after surgery. All medical records identified during this process were then reviewed by a panel of urogynecology attendings and fellows to select patients who were truly clinical outliers. By this method we identified 10 patients (cases) who experienced early overt surgical failure. We also randomly selected 40 controls from our research database which includes greater than 500 patients who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy during the same time period and had been objectively and subjectively assessed for ≥ 12 months with surgical success at ≥ 12 months that did not undergo prolapse re-operation or re-treatment. Demographics and peri-operative details were compared between cases and controls. Exclusion criteria for controls included use of other graft material besides polypropylene mesh, prior surgery for prolapse involving graft material, and conversion to laparotomy. DNA from the 10 cases and 40 controls was isolated from buccal swabs and genotyped on a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array that contains 250,000 markers (NspI 250K SNP array, Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). All women in this study identified as Caucasian. All subjects provided written informed consent to study participation and data release. This was a case-control study approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Atlantic Health System in Morristown New Jersey (R11-10-004).

Project description:Interventions: Elective or emergent colonic resection, defined using the procedural ICD-10 codes: 32000-00 Limited excision of large intestine with formation of stoma 32000-01 Right hemicolectomy with formation of stoma 32000-02 Laparoscopic limited excision of large intestine with formation of stoma 32000-03 Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with formation of stoma 32003-00 Limited excision of large intestine with anastomosis 32003-01 Right hemicolectomy with anastomosis 32003-02 Laparoscopic limited excision of large intestine with anastomosis 32003-03 Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with anastomosis 32004-00 Subtotal colectomy with formation of stoma 32004-01 Extended right hemicolectomy with formation of stoma 32004-02 Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with formation of stoma 32004-03 Laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy with formation of stoma 32005-00 Subtotal colectomy with anastomosis 32005-01 Extended right hemicolectomy with anastomosis 32005-02 Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with anastomosis 32005-03 Laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy with anastomosis 32006-00 Left hemicolectomy with anastomosis 32006-01 Left hemicolectomy with formation of stoma 32006-02 Laparoscopic left hemicolectomy with anastomosis 32006-03 Laparoscopic left hemicolectomy with formation of stoma 32009-00 Total colectomy with ileostomy 32009-01 Laparoscopic total colectomy with ileostomy 32012-00 Total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis 32012-01 Laparoscopic total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis The procedures were performed at the Austin Hospital, a tertiary hospital with colorectal expertise, over the period of January 2013 and June 2018. Patients were followed-up for 30 days following discharge from the index admission. If no subsequent readmissions occurred within this period, follow-up ceased. If a patient was readmitted within the 30-day period, then the readmission was included, and followi Primary outcome(s): Costs of complications (as a composite outcome) following Colon resections. Costs of complications defined as cost of patients with complications less the cost of patients without complications (ie by comparison of patients with and without complications). All costs related to the index admission for colon resection and any consequent readmissions are included. Costs related to preoperative course are not considered. Allocation of costs will be calculated using an activity-based costing methodology. Only in-hospital costs are considered, with both direct and indirect costs assessed to produce a total cost for each patient. Costs for each patient will be obtained from the Austin Health Department of Finance, which maintain an itemised prospective database of all hospital expenses related to each patient.[Costs will be calculated from day of surgery to hospital discharge. Readmissions are considered within 30 days of discharge from the index admission.] Study Design: Purpose: Natural history;Duration: Longitudinal;Selection: Defined population;Timing: Retrospective

Dataset Information

Minimally Invasive Right Colectomy Anastomosis Study

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets