Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

13 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Fruquintinib Combined With mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI in First-line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Fruquintinib Combined With mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI as the first-line treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

DISEASE(S): Metastatic Colorectal Cancer,Colorectal Neoplasms

PROVIDER: 2386575 | ecrin-mdr-crc |

REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Fruquintinib With mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI as First-Line Therapy for Conversion Surgery in mCRC

Project description:The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the efficacy and safety of Fruquintinib with mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI in patients with mCRC. The main question it aims to answer is: The conversion surgery rate of the therapy mentioned above. The ORR, R0 surgery rate, DCR, PFS, OS, and safety will be evaluated.

| 71670 | ecrin-mdr-crc

TCM evidence-based capacity building and evidence-based implementation plan of TCM combined with chemotherapy in treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer:A bidirectional cohort study of Zhenqiliujun anti-cancer granules combined with mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI regimen and bevacizumab/cetuximab in first-line treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal

Project description:Interventions: TCM combined with chemotherapy:MFOLFOX6 /FOLFIRI regimen + bevacizumab/cetuximab + Zhenqi Liujun cancer suppressant granules.;Chemotherapy group:MFOLFOX6 /FOLFIRI + bevacizumab/cetuximab Primary outcome(s): Progression-free survival;Adverse incident Study Design: Non randomized control

| 2705538 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Colorectal cancer classification based on gene expression is not associated with FOLFIRI response

Project description:Sadanandam et al. (2013) recently published a study based on the use of microarray data to classify colorectal cancer (CRC) samples. The classification claimed to have strong clinical implications, as reflected in the paper title: “A colorectal cancer classification system that associates cellular phenotype and responses to therapy”. They defined five subtypes: (i) inflammatory; (ii) goblet-like; (iii) enterocyte; (iv) transit-amplifying; and (v) stem-like. Based on drug sensitivity data from 21 patients, they also reported that the so-called stem-like subtype show differential sensitivity to FOLFIRI. This is the key result in their publication, since it implies a direct relation between the subtype and the choice of CRC therapy (i.e. FOLFIRI response). However, our analyses using the same drug sensitivity data and results from additional patients showed that the CRC classification reported by Sadanandam et al. is not predictive of FOLFIRI response.

2014-09-10 | GSE54483 | GEO

Endostar Combined With mFOLFOX6 for First-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Project description:This study is to assess the efficacy and safety of Endostar combined with mFOLFOX6 in untreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients, and to find the markers that may predict the efficacy.

| 2143231 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Safety and efficacy of Alternating mFOLFOX6 and FOLFIRI every 4cycles as First line Therapy in Advanced colorectal Cancer

Project description:Interventions: Alternating mFOLFOX6 and FOLFIRI every 4cycles. Primary outcome(s): RR Study Design: Single arm Non-randomized

| 2616832 | ecrin-mdr-crc

The Efficacy and Safety of Fruquintinib Plus Chemotherapy as Second-line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Project description:This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized study evaluating the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib combined with chemotherapy vs bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients will receive fruquintinib+ FOLFIRI or bevacizumab+FOLFIRI as the second-line treatment. After receiving 4-6 months of second-line treatment, patients who achieve disease control will receive fruquintinib + capecitabine or bevacizumab+ capecitabine as maintenance treatment. All patients will be treated until progressive disease, death from any cause, unacceptable toxicity or informed consent withdrawal.

| 2749552 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Fruquintinib Combined With Chemotherapy as Third-line /Third-line+ Treatment in Advanced Colorectal Cancer

Project description:To explore the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib combined with chemotherapy as third-line/third-line+ Treatment in advanced metastatic colorectal cancer

| 65224 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Safety and efficacy of Alternating mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab and FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab every 4cycles as First line Therapy in Advanced colorectal Cancer

Project description:Interventions: Alternating mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab and FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab every 4cycles. Primary outcome(s): PFS Study Design: Single arm Non-randomized

| 2616805 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Randomised phase II trial of mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 plus cetuximab as first-line treatment for colorectal liver metastasis (ATOM trial).

Project description:BackgroundChemotherapy with biologics followed by liver surgery improves the resection rate and survival of patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). However, no prospective study has compared the outcomes of chemotherapy with bevacizumab (BEV) versus cetuximab (CET).MethodsThe ATOM study is the first randomised trial comparing BEV and CET for initially unresectable CRLM. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive mFOLFOX6 plus either BEV or CET. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsBetween May 2013 and April 2016, 122 patients were enrolled. Median PFS was 11.5 months (95% CI 9.2-13.3 months) in the BEV group and 14.8 months (95% CI 9.7-17.3 months) in the CET group (hazard ratio 0.803; P = 0.33). Patients with a smaller-number but larger-sized metastases did better in the CET group. In the BEV and CET groups, the response rates were 68.4% and 84.7% and the resection rates were 56.1% and 49.2%, respectively.ConclusionAlthough CET achieved a better response rate than BEV for patients with a small number of large liver metastases, both biologics had similar efficacy regarding liver resection and acceptable safety profiles. To achieve optimal PFS, biologics should be selected in accordance with patient conditions.Trial registrationThis trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT01836653), and UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR number UMIN000010209).

| S-EPMC6738101 | biostudies-literature