Fruquintinib Plus Capecitabine as Maintenance Treatment of RAS / BRAF Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
DISEASE(S): Metastatic Colorectal Cancer,Colorectal Neoplasms
PROVIDER: 2387531 | ecrin-mdr-crc |
REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR
Similar Datasets
Project description:ImportanceFluorouracil-based chemotherapy combined with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor/vascular endothelial growth factor therapy is the standard first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer followed by low-intensity maintenance therapy to balance the clinical efficacy and adverse effects (AEs). However, there have been concerns about the AEs of capecitabine plus cetuximab as a maintenance therapy in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.ObjectiveTo evaluate the biological activity and safety of capecitabine plus cetuximab as a novel maintenance therapy for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.Design, setting, and participantsThis phase 2 prospective clinical trial was conducted from April 29, 2016, to April 29, 2019, at 5 centers in China. Patients diagnosed as having RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer were recruited to receive fluorouracil-based cytotoxic agents combined with cetuximab followed by capecitabine plus cetuximab for maintenance therapy. Forty-seven patients with histologically confirmed metastatic colorectal cancer and genetic test results showing a wild-type RAS were enrolled in maintenance therapy.InterventionsInduction therapy for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer was 8 to 12 cycles of fluorouracil-based chemotherapy combined with cetuximab. After stable disease status or better was achieved, reduced-dose capecitabine plus cetuximab was administered for maintenance therapy.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end point was progression-free survival during maintenance therapy. The secondary end points were total progression-free survival, overall survival, quality of life, safety, and toxic effects of treatment.ResultsForty-seven patients were enrolled in maintenance therapy, with a median age of 52 years (range, 25-81 years) and 32 (68%) of them being men. The median maintenance progression-free survival was 7.2 (95% CI, 5.8-8.6) months. The median progression-free survival was 12.7 (95% CI, 11.8-15.4) months. The median overall survival was 27.4 (95% CI, 21.4-35.5) months. Grade 3 to 4 AEs during induction therapy included neutropenia (4 patients [9%]), diarrhea (4 patients [9%]), nausea or vomiting (3 patients [6%]), rash acneiform (10 patients [21%]), and hand-foot syndrome (8 patients [17%]). Grade 3 to 4 AEs during maintenance therapy included diarrhea (2 patients [4%]), rash acneiform (8 patients [17%]), and hand-foot syndrome (5 patients [11%]).Conclusions and relevanceReduced-dose capecitabine plus cetuximab after initial chemotherapy is a novel maintenance therapy for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer that achieved good outcomes and tolerable nonserious AEs.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02717923.
| S-EPMC7372324 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib plus capecitabine versus capecitabine as maintenance therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line treatment. Patients who have already achieved disease control (including CR/PR and SD) after ≥6 cycles of standard first-line induction treatment, and are still unresectable would be assigned into 2 maintenance treatment groups by randomization in a 1:1 ratio to receive fruquintinib + capecitabine or capecitabine. All patients will be treated until progressive disease, death from any cause, unacceptable toxicity or informed consent withdrawal.
| 2740471 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Interventions: experimental group:fruquintinib and cetuximab
Primary outcome(s): Safety;grade 3/4 incidence of adverse side;dose-limiting toxicity
Study Design: Single arm
| 2698605 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib plus capecitabine versus bevacizumab plus capecitabine as maintenance therapy following first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients who have already achieved disease control (including CR/PR and SD), without discontinuation for toxicity, and are progression free after 4-6 months of standard first-line induction treatment will be assigned to 2 maintenance treatment groups by randomization in a 1:1 ratio to receive fruquintinib + capecitabine (Arm A) or bevacizumab + capecitabine (Arm B). The study contains a safety lead-in phase in which the safety and tolerability of fruquintinib + capecitabine will be assessed prior to the phase 2 portion of the study. All patients from Arm A and Arm B will be treated until progressive disease, death from any cause, unacceptable toxicity or informed consent withdrawal (whichever occurs earlier).
| 2365787 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:BackgroundAnlotinib, an oral small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR 1/2/3, FGFR 1-4, PDGFR a/β, and c-kit, had demonstrated prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This multicenter, single-arm, phase II, exploratory study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with capecitabine and oxaliplatin as first-line treatment for unresectable RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC.MethodsPatients aged 18-75 with RAS/BRAF wild-type unresectable mCRC, without prior systemic treatment, and ECOG performance status ≤1 were enrolled. Eligible patients received capecitabine (850 mg/m2, p.o., bid, on day 1-14 every 21 days), oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2, i.v., on day 1 every 21 days), and anlotinib (12 mg, p.o., qd, on days 1-14 every 21 days) as induction therapy. Following 6 cycles of therapy, patients who achieved response or stable disease received capecitabine and anlotinib as maintenance therapy until tumor progression. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST (version: 1.1), and the secondary endpoints were PFS, disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), and safety.ResultsBetween November 2019 and February 2021, 31 patients were enrolled. One patient was excluded for refusing treatment. The primary endpoint of ORR was 76.7% (95% CI, 57.7-90.1) with 1 patient achieving a complete response and 22 patients partial response. DCR was 93.3% (95% CI, 77.9-99.2). At a median follow-up of 14.1 months (95% CI, 9.9-18.3), median PFS was 11.3 months (95% CI, 7.1-14.1), and DOR was 7.9 months (95% CI, 5.5-12.7). Twenty-five (83.3%) patients experienced grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). No grade 5 TEAE was reported. The most common grade 3 or 4 TEAEs (>10%) were hypertension (15/30; 50%), neutrophil count decreased (8/30; 26.7%), and diarrhea (4/30; 13.3%). A total of 18 (60%) patients had TEAEs that resulted in dose reduction, interruptions, or delays.ConclusionsAnlotinib combined with capecitabine and oxaliplatin showed considerable ORR, DCR, PFS, and DOR in the first-line therapy of mCRC with manageable toxicity profiles.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov : NCT04080843.
| S-EPMC9071922 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeWe assessed the prognostic/predictive role of primary tumor sidedness and uncommon alterations of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) primary resistance (primary resistance in RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies [PRESSING] panel) in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who were randomly assigned to panitumumab plus fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) induction followed by maintenance with panitumumab with or without fluorouracil (FU) plus leucovorin (LV); Valentino trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02476045).Patients and methodsThis prespecified retrospective analysis included 199 evaluable patients with RAS/BRAF wt. The PRESSING panel included the following: immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization for HER2/MET amplification, IHC with or without RNA sequencing for ALK/ROS1/NTRKs/RET fusions, next-generation sequencing for HER2/PIK3CAex.20/PTEN/AKT1 and RAS mutations with low mutant allele fraction, and multiplex polymerase chain reaction for microsatellite instability. PRESSING status (any positive biomarker v all negative) and sidedness were correlated with overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in the study population and by treatment arm.ResultsOverall, left- and right-sided tumors were 85.4% and 14.6%, respectively, and PRESSING-negative and -positive tumors were 75.4% and 24.6%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 26 months, inferior outcomes were consistently observed in right- versus left-sided tumors for ORR (55.2% v 74.1%; P = .037), PFS (8.4 v 11.5 months; P = .026), and OS (2-year rate: 50.2% v 65.1%; P = .062). Similar results were observed in the PRESSING-positive versus PRESSING-negative subgroup for ORR (59.2% v 75.3%; P = .030), PFS (7.7 v 12.1 months; P < .001), and OS (2-year rate: 48.1% v 68.1%; P = .021). The PFS benefit of FU plus LV added to panitumumab maintenance, reported in the study, was independent from sidedness and PRESSING status (interaction for PFS P = .293 and .127, respectively). However, outcomes were extremely poor in patients who received single-agent panitumumab and had right-sided tumors (median PFS, 7.7 months; 2-year OS, 38.5%) or PRESSING-positive tumors (median PFS, 7.4 months; 2-year OS, 47.0%).ConclusionThe combined assessment of sidedness and molecular alterations of anti-EGFR primary resistance identified a consistent proportion of patients with RAS/BRAF-wt mCRC who had inferior benefit from initial anti-EGFR-based regimens, particularly after maintenance with single-agent anti-EGFRs.
| S-EPMC6864846 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTo investigate the effectiveness and safety of maintenance regimens based on cetuximab, we conducted a real-world, single-arm, retrospective study at a single center.MethodsIn Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who received cetuximab-based maintenance therapy between December 2020 and December 2021 were included. All patients had RAS and BRAF wild-type. The maintenance regimen consisted of 6-12 cycles of cetuximab plus irinotecan (Phase 1) and cetuximab (Phase 2). Patients could receive reintroduction therapy in case of disease progression during Phase 2. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety data were collected.ResultsAccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study, a total of 108 subjects who received maintenance therapy were included- 51 experienced disease progression during Phase 1, with PFS (1) of 7.3 months. Among the 52 patients who entered Phase 2, 17 were still in this phase at the end of follow-up, with PFS (2) of 10.1 months. In Phase 2, 35 patients experienced disease progression, of whom 24 received reintroduction therapy, with PFS (3) of 6.7 months. The overall PFS (total) during the maintenance period was 11.9 months, and the OS was 39.2 months. Grade III or higher adverse events were 4.6% during Phase 1 and 0% during Phase 2.ConclusionInnovative cetuximab-based maintenance therapy showed a trend toward improving the prognosis of mCRC patients with RAS and BRAF wild-type, while the toxic side effects of maintenance therapy were manageable.Clinical trial registrationhttps://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2000040940.
| S-EPMC11300202 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized parallel-group phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Fruquintinib alternating with Bevacizumab plus Capecitabine versus Bevacizumab plus Capecitabine as maintenance therapy following first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Approximately 40 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have achieved partial remission after completing 8 cycles of standard first-line chemotherapy (FOLFOX combined with Bevacizumab) but are still in un-resectable state will be assigned to 2 maintenance treatment groups by randomization in a 1:1 ratio to receive Fruquintinib alternating with Bevacizumab plus Capecitabine (Arm A) or Bevacizumab plus Capecitabine (Arm B). The study contains a safety lead-in phase in which the safety and efficacy of Fruquintinib alternating with Bevacizumab plus Capecitabine will be assessed in approximately 20 patients. All patients from Arm A and Arm B will be treated until unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of informed consent, death, or other criteria for ending the study (whichever occurs earlier). The study will evaluate PFS, ORR, DCR, OS and safety.
| 3051 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Preoperative radiochemotherapy followed by surgical removal of the rectum with total mesorectum excision is the preferred treatment option for stages II and III rectal cancer. However, development of metastatic disease is the main cause of death for these patients with 5-year disease-free survival rates of 56 %. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) targeted therapy is effective in metastatic rectal cancer, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) signaling may mediate resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Moreover, preclinical data support a synergistic effect of EGFR inhibition with radiation therapy.This Bayesian phase II trial with adaptive randomization was designed to assess the efficacy of adding lapatinib, a dual inhibitor of EGFR and HER-2, to standard radiochemotherapy with capecitabine in stages II and III rectal cancer.The results of this trial will provide evidence of the feasibility and efficacy of the combination of lapatinib-capecitabine as radiosensitizers and explore potential predictive biomarkers for response to this novel neoadjuvant approach to resectable rectal cancer.EudraCT 2013-001203-36 . Registered on 13 December 2013.
| S-EPMC5031350 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The RAS family of oncogenes (HRAS, NRAS, and KRAS) are among the most frequently mutated protein families in cancers. RAS-mutated tumors were originally thought to proliferate independently of upstream signaling inputs, but we now know that non-mutated wild-type (WT) RAS proteins play an important role in modulating downstream effector signaling and driving therapeutic resistance in RAS-mutated cancers. This modulation is complex as different WT RAS family members have opposing functions. The protein product of the WT RAS allele of the same isoform as mutated RAS is often tumor-suppressive and lost during tumor progression. In contrast, RTK-dependent activation of the WT RAS proteins from the two non-mutated WT RAS family members is tumor-promoting. Further, rebound activation of RTK-WT RAS signaling underlies therapeutic resistance to targeted therapeutics in RAS-mutated cancers. The contributions of WT RAS to proliferation and transformation in RAS-mutated cancer cells places renewed interest in upstream signaling molecules, including the phosphatase/adaptor SHP2 and the RasGEFs SOS1 and SOS2, as potential therapeutic targets in RAS-mutated cancers.
| S-EPMC8146411 | biostudies-literature