Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

The Study of Colorectal Neoplastic Polyps Miss Rate Determined by Back-to-Back Colonoscopies in Asymptomatic Subjects for Colorectal Cancer Screening

ABSTRACT: Interventions: N/A;Screening Primary outcome(s): The polyp miss rate while performing colonoscopy After second colonoscopy in the same day Number of missed polyps

DISEASE(S): Miss Rate,Back Colonoscopies,Screening Intervention,Back,To,Colorectal Screening,Colorectal Polyps

PROVIDER: 2565396 | ecrin-mdr-crc |

REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Hypophthalmichthys nobilis strain:miss

Project description:Hypophthalmichthys nobilis strain:miss Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA401057 | ENA

Bougainvillea buttiana cultivar:Miss Manila

Project description:Bougainvillea buttiana cultivar:Miss Manila Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA563964 | ENA

Bougainvillea buttiana cultivar:Miss Manila

Project description:Bougainvillea buttiana cultivar:Miss Manila Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA563967 | ENA

Examining Techniques on Adenoma Miss Rate in Proximal Colon

Project description:The primary aim of this study is - to explore the usefulness of re-examination and retroflexion on adenoma miss rate (AMR) in the proximal colon. Other aims include to explore the data below when re-examination or retroflexion is used. * Adenoma detection rate, ADR * Polyp miss rate, PMR * Polyp detection rate, PDR * Withdrawal time, WT

| 2259909 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Adenoma Miss rate in Artificial Intelligence-Based versus Conventional Colonoscopy, A Prospective Randomized Trial

Project description:Interventions: Use the Artificial Intelligence Colonoscopy first to CRC screening, if the polyp or adenoma was seen, remove it After that, use the conventional colonoscopy to screening again for detection the polyp or adenoma,Use the Conventional colonoscopy first to CRC screening, if the polyp or adenoma was seen, remove it After that, use the Artificial intelligence colonoscopy to screening again for detection the polyp or adenoma;Active Comparator Device,Active Comparator Device;CADe-Conventional,Conventional-CADe Primary outcome(s): Adenoma Miss Rate the day colonoscopy the number adenoma detected at second colonoscopy divided by the total number of lesions detected at first and second colonoscopy Study Design: Randomized

| 75207 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Comparing Detection of Standard Colonoscopy, CAD-EYE and Combined CAD-EYE and G-EYE Aided Colonoscopy

Project description:The purpose of this study is to compare the additional diagnostic yield over Standard Colonoscopy (i.e., the adenoma miss-rate reduction) obtained by performing CADEYE and G-EYE aided colonoscopy, vs. the additional diagnostic yield over Standard Colonoscopy (i.e., the adenoma miss-rate reduction) obtained by performing CAD-EYE aided colonoscopy.

| 2404486 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Gene expression patterns of biopsies from colonoscopies taken in 2007, 2008, and 2009 of an ulcerative colitis patient infected with Trichuris trichiura

Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the following subset Series: GSE25275: Gene expression patterns of biopsies from a colonoscopy taken in 2007 of an ulcerative colitis patient infected with Trichuris trichiura GSE25276: Gene expression patterns of biopsies from a colonoscopy taken in 2008 of an ulcerative colitis patient infected with Trichuris trichiura GSE25277: Gene expression patterns of biopsies from a colonoscopy taken in 2009 of an ulcerative colitis patient infected with Trichuris trichiura Refer to individual Series

2010-11-20 | E-GEOD-25510 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Serrated polyp detection rate in colonoscopies performed by gastrointestinal fellows.

Project description:BackgroundClinically significant serrated polyp detection rate (CSSDR) and proximal serrated polyp detection rate (PSDR) have been suggested as the potential quality benchmarks for colonoscopy (CSSDR = 7% and PSDR = 11%) in comparison to the established benchmark adenoma detection rate (ADR). Another emerging milestone is the detection rate of lateral spreading lesions (LSLs).ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate CSSDR, PSDR, ADR, and LSL detection rates among gastrointestinal (GI) fellows performing a colonoscopy. A secondary aim was to evaluate patient factors associated with the detection rates of these lesions.Design and methodsA retrospective review of 799 colonoscopy reports was performed. GI fellow details, demographic data, and pathology found on colonoscopy were collected. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with CSSDR, PSDR, ADR, and LSL detection rates. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsFor our patient population, the median age was 58 years; 396 (49.8%) were male and 386 (48.6%) were African American. The 15 GI fellows ranged from first (F1), second (F2), or third (F3) year of training. We found an overall CSSDR of 4.4%, PSDR of 10.5%, ADR of 42.1%, and LSL detection rate of 3.2%. Female gender was associated with CSSDR, while only age was associated with PSDR. GI fellow level of training was associated with LSL detection rate, with the odds of detecting them expected to be four times higher in F2/F3s than F1s.ConclusionAlthough GI fellows demonstrated an above-recommended ADR and nearly reached target PSDR, they failed to achieve target CSSDR. Future studies investigating a benchmark for LSL detection rate are needed to quantify if GI fellows are detecting these lesions at adequate rates.

| S-EPMC9749503 | biostudies-literature

Comparison of Detection and Miss Rates of Blue Laser Imaging Versus Conventional White Light Colonoscopy

Project description:It is a randomized controlled trial with tandem colonoscopy.Participants were randomized for use of either blue laser imaging or conventional White Light Colonoscopy on withdrawal method.comparison of detection and miss rates of BLI group Versus conventional White Light Colonoscopy.

| 2231269 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Colonoscopic miss rates determined by tandem colonoscopy in high risk patients for colorectal neoplasias: a prospective study

Project description:Primary outcome(s): polyp miss rates during the index colonoscopy Study Design: Observational Study Model : Other, Time Perspective : Prospective, Enrollment : 198, Biospecimen Retention : Not collect nor Archive

| 2508697 | ecrin-mdr-crc

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data