Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

23 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Role of oral antibiotics in reducing the chance of infection after operations for cancer of the rectum

ABSTRACT: Intervention1: Oral antibiotic bowel preparation: All the patients in this arm in addition to the bowel preparation solution ( 45 ml of Exelyte bowel preparation solution ( monobasic sodium phosphate dihydrate 24.417 g, disodium hydrogen orthophosphate dihydrate 5.439 g) to be consumed at 8 am and 4 pm ), will also receive 3 tablets each of, 1 gm of Erythromycin Estolate and 400 mg of Metronidazole in the package, to be taken at 1pm, 2pm and 11 pm, on the day prior to surgery Control Intervention1: Mechanical Bowel preparation : Exelyte: 2 bottles of 45 ml of Exelyte bowel preparation solution ( monobasic sodium phosphate dihydrate 24.417 g, disodium hydrogen orthophosphate dihydrate 5.439 g) to be consumed at 8 am and 4 pm on the day prior to surgery. Primary outcome(s): . To evaluate and assess the superiority of oral antibiotic bowel preparation in reducing incidence of surgical site infections in patients undergoing elective resection for rectal cancer in comparison to only mechanical bowel preparation at a tertiary care center in India.Timepoint: 30 days from the day of surgery Study Design: Randomized, Parallel Group Trial Method of generating randomization sequence:Computer generated randomization Method of allocation concealment:Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes Blinding and masking:Outcome Assessor Blinded

DISEASE(S): Patients With Rectal Cancer

PROVIDER: 2585601 | ecrin-mdr-crc |

REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Oral Antibiotics Versus Mechanical Bowel Preparation Only Prior Rectal Surgery

Project description:MOBILE2 is a randomized controlled trial comparing mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation to mechanical bowel preparation only in patients undergoing anterior rectal resection with primary anastomosis. Primary endpoint is Comprehensive Complication Index within 30 days from surgery.

| 2331037 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Randomized Controlled Trial: ERAS Program on Colorectal Cancer Surgery Decrease Length of Hospital Stay

Project description:Interventions: Preoperative Phase â€¢Fasting at midnight â€¢Taking mechanical bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol 2 liters or sodium phosphate 90 milliliters â€¢Prophylaxis antibiotic 30 min before surgery: cefoxitin or ceftriaxone and/or methonidazole. In penicillin allergy, ciprofloxacin was used instead. Intraoperative Phase â€¢General anesthesia â€¢In patients suspected bowel obstruction or ileus surgeon may be inserted nasogastric tube Postoperative Phase â€¢Fasting 5-7 days postoperative â€¢Control pain with strong opioid ,Preoperative Phase â€¢Fasting at 3 AM â€¢No mechanical bowel preparation â€¢Prophylaxis antibiotic 30 min before surgery: cefoxitin or ceftriaxone and/or methonidazole. In penicillin allergy, ciprofloxacin was used instead. Intraoperative Phase â€¢Combined general and epidural at T7-8 level anesthesia In patients suspected bowel obstruction or ileus surgeon may be inserted nasogastric tube Postoperative Phase â€¢Started with liquid diet within twenty-four hour â€¢Patients were encouraged to ambulate within six hour after surgery â€¢Control pain with epidural block and paracetamol. Adding weak opioid when pain score greater than or equal to four. ;Active Comparator Procedure/Surgery,Experimental Procedure/Surgery;Traditional Program,ERAS Program Primary outcome(s): length of hospital stay 30 day after surgery number of the day in hospital Study Design: Randomized

| 2566621 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Bowel Preparations Before Colonoscopy

Project description:Polyethylene glycol is the gold standard of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. The most important disadvantage is high volume of this preparation. Sulphate based solution (SBS), low volume PEG + ascorbic acid and solution of magnesium citric acid and sodium picosulfate could be suitable substitution of polyethylene glycol.

| 2251227 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Is blinding the endoscopists to bowel preparations in randomised controlled trials a reality?

Project description:Study hypothesis: The primary aim of this study was to explore whether endoscopists can be effectively blinded to the type of bowel preparation in the trials that compare the cleaning efficacy of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol Primary outcome(s): The primary outcome of this study is to determine the proportion of correct estimation of the bowel preparation by all endoscopists combined

| 2417969 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Difference of Surgical Site Infection Between Using Sodium Picosulfate Solution(PicosolutionⓇ) and Oral Sulfate Tablet(ORA·FANGⓇ) in Colorectal Cancer Surgery

Project description:This is a prospective randomized study to evaluate the difference in the rate of surgical site infection between the patients who used Sodium Picosulfate solution(PicosolutionⓇ) and tablet Oral Sulphate Solution(ORA·FANGⓇ) for bowel preparation before colorectal cancer surgery .

| 2354985 | ecrin-mdr-crc

A Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing Polyethylene Glycol and Sodium Picosulphate With Magnesium Citrate

Project description:Adequate bowel cleansing is important for a completeness of colonoscopy and detection of colon polyps. Inadequate bowel preparation leads to longer duration of colonoscopy and obscured mucosal visualization resulting in missed lesions. Bowel cleansing agents are simply classified into the large volume, iso-osmotic polyethylene glycol (PEG) based solutions or the small volume osmotically active agents, such as sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate (SPMC). There are rare reports that compare directly conventional polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution and sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) for bowel preparation in korea. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of different regimens of SPMC and PEG solution.

| 2139045 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Short-term Outcomes of Full Bowel Preparation (MBP+OA) for Rectal Resections for Cancer Versus MBP Alone

Project description:The purpose of the study is to determine if short-term outcomes of rectal resections after full bowel preparation (mechanical bowel preparation plus oral antibiotics) are superior to rectal resections with only mechanical bowel preparation.

| 2354896 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Oral Antibiotics Before Rectal Cancer Surgery

Project description:This study aims to demonstrate that a preoperative combination of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics, before elective laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery, is associated with a reduction of postoperative surgical site infection rate, as compared to mechanical bowel preparation alone Our hypothesis is that a preoperative colonic preparation including a combination of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics before elective laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery is associated with a reduced rate of 30-day postoperative surgical site infection, as compared to mechanical bowel preparation alone

| 2270348 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Oral Antibiotics Before Colon Cancer Surgery

Project description:This study aims to demonstrate that a preoperative combination of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics, before elective laparoscopic colon cancer surgery, is associated with a reduction of postoperative surgical site infection rate, as compared to mechanical bowel preparation alone, oral antibiotics alone, or no colonic preparation. Our Hypothesis is that a preoperative colonic preparation including a combination of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics before elective laparoscopic colon cancer surgery is associated with a reduced rate of 30-day postoperative surgical site infection, as compared to mechanical bowel preparation alone, oral antibiotics alone, or no colonic preparation.

| 2269131 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in patients with colon cancer

Project description:Interventions: Standard therapy group 2L of Niflex as mechanical bowel preparation trial therapy group no mechanical bowel preparation Primary outcome(s): incisional surgical site infection (SSI) Study Design: Parallel Randomized

| 2628847 | ecrin-mdr-crc

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data