Project description:The biology of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant therapy is underrepresented in the literature and provides a window-of-opportunity to explore the genomic and microenvironment modulation of tumours exposed to therapy. Here, we characterised the mutational, gene expression, pathway enrichment and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) dynamics across different timepoints of 35 HER2-negative primary breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant eribulin therapy (SOLTI-1007 NEOERIBULIN-NCT01669252). Whole-exome data (N = 88 samples) generated mutational profiles and candidate neoantigens and were analysed along with RNA-Nanostring 545-gene expression (N = 96 samples) and stromal TILs (N = 105 samples). Tumour mutation burden varied across patients at baseline but not across the sampling timepoints for each patient. Mutational signatures were not always conserved across tumours. There was a trend towards higher odds of response and less hazard to relapse when the percentage of subclonal mutations was low, suggesting that more homogenous tumours might have better responses to neoadjuvant therapy. Few driver mutations (5.1%) generated putative neoantigens. Mutation and neoantigen load were positively correlated (R2 = 0.94, p = <0.001); neoantigen load was weakly correlated with stromal TILs (R2 = 0.16, p = 0.02). An enrichment in pathways linked to immune infiltration and reduced programmed cell death expression were seen after 12 weeks of eribulin in good responders. VEGF was downregulated over time in the good responder group and FABP5, an inductor of epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), was upregulated in cases that recurred (p < 0.05). Mutational heterogeneity, subclonal architecture and the improvement of immune microenvironment along with remodelling of hypoxia and EMT may influence the response to neoadjuvant treatment.
Project description:It is well documented that human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression/amplification is associated with poor survival in breast cancer patients. However, it is largely unknown whether HER2 somatic mutations are associated with survival in HER2-negative breast cancer patients. Here, we identified HER2 somatic mutations in tumors from 1348 unselected breast cancer patients by sequencing the entire HER2 coding region. All of these mutations were tested for in corresponding blood samples to determine whether they were somatic or germline mutations. We further investigated the associations between HER2 somatic mutations and recurrence-free survival and distant recurrence-free survival in this cohort of patients. We found that 27 of 1348 (2.0%) of these patients carried a HER2 somatic mutation. In vitro experiments indicated that some of the novel mutations and those with unknown functions increased HER2 activity. HER2 status was available for 1306 patients, and the HER2 somatic mutation rates in HER2-positive (n = 353) and HER2-negative breast cancers (n = 953) were 1.4% and 2.3%, respectively. Among the HER2-negative patients, those with a HER2 somatic mutation had a significantly worse recurrence-free survival (unadjusted hazard ratio = 2.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-5.72, P = 0.002) and distant recurrence-free survival (unadjusted hazard ratio = 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-5.68, P = 0.004) than those with wild-type HER2. Taken together, our findings suggested that HER2 somatic mutations occur at a higher frequency in HER2-negative breast cancer, and HER2-negative breast cancer patients with these mutations have poor survival. Therefore, HER2-negative patients with a HER2 somatic mutation are potentially good candidates for HER2-targeted therapy.
Project description:Tumors act systemically to sustain cancer progression, affecting the physiological processes in the host and triggering responses in the blood circulating cells. In this study, we explored blood transcriptional patterns of patients with two subtypes of HER2 negative breast cancers, with different prognosis and therapeutic outcome. Peripheral blood samples from seven healthy female donors and 29 women with breast cancer including 14 triple-negative breast cancers and 15 hormone-dependent breast cancers were evaluated by microarray. We also evaluated the stroma in primary tumors. Transcriptional analysis revealed distinct molecular signatures in the blood of HER2- breast cancer patients according to ER/PR status. Our data showed the implication of immune signaling in both breast cancer subtypes with an enrichment of these processes in the blood of TNBC patients. We observed a significant alteration of "chemokine signaling," "IL-8 signaling," and "communication between innate and adaptive immune cells" pathways in the blood of TNBC patients correlated with an increased inflammation and necrosis in their primary tumors. Overall, our data indicate that the presence of triple-negative breast cancer is associated with an enrichment of altered systemic immune-related pathways, suggesting that immunotherapy could possibly be synergistic to the chemotherapy, to improve the clinical outcome of these patients.
Project description:INTRODUCTION: In general, genomic signatures of breast cancer subtypes have little or no overlap owing to the heterogeneous genetic backgrounds of study samples. Thus, obtaining a reliable signature in the context of isogenic nature of the cells has been challenging and the precise contribution of isogenic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) versus non-TNBC remains poorly defined. METHODS: We established isogenic stable cell lines representing TNBC and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 positive (HER2+) breast cancers by introducing HER2 in TNBC cell lines MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468. We examined protein level expression and functionality of the transfected receptor by treatment with an antagonist of HER2. Using microarray profiling, we obtained a comprehensive gene list of differentially expressed between TNBC and HER2+ clones. We identified and validated underlying isogenic components using qPCR and also compared results with expression data from patients with similar breast cancer subtypes. RESULTS: We identified 544 and 1087 statistically significant differentially expressed genes between isogenic TNBC and HER2+ samples in MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 backgrounds respectively and a shared signature of 49 genes. By comparing results from MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 backgrounds with two patient microarray datasets, we identified 17 and 22 common genes with same expression trend respectively. Additionally, we identified 56 and 78 genes from MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 comparisons respectively present in our published RNA-seq data. CONCLUSIONS: Using our unique model system, we have identified an isogenic gene expression signature between TNBC and HER2+ breast cancer. A portion of our results was also verified in patient data samples, indicating an existence of isogenic element associated with HER2 status between genetically heterogeneous breast cancer samples. These findings may potentially contribute to the development of molecular platform that would be valuable for diagnostic and therapeutic decision for TNBC and in distinguishing it from HER2+ subtype.
Project description:HER2 and HER3 play key driving functions in the pathophysiology of HER2-amplified breast cancers, but this function is less well characterized in other cancers driven by HER2 amplification. This study aimed to explore the role of HER2 and HER3 signaling in other types of HER2-amplified cancer. The expression and signaling activity of HER2, HER3, and downstream pathway proteins were studied in cell panels representing HER2-amplified cancers of the breast, bladder, colon and rectal, stomach, esophagus, lung, tongue, and endometrium along with controls lacking HER2 amplification. We report that HER2-amplified cancers are addicted to HER2 across different cancer types and the depth of addiction is best linked with the expression level of HER2, but not with HER3 expression. We report that the expression and constitutive phosphorylation of HER3 are ubiquitous in HER2-amplified breast cancer cell lines, but much more variable in HER2-amplified cancer cells from other tissues. We observed the lapatinib-induced compensatory upregulation of HER3 signaling in many types of HER2-amplified cancers, although with much variability. We find that HER3 expression is essential for in vivo tumorigenic growth in some HER2-amplified tumors but not others. Importantly HER3 expression level does not correlate well with its functional importance. More biomarkers will be needed to guide the optimal use of HER3 inhibitors in HER2-amplified cancers from non-breast origin. Unlike oncogenes activated through mutational events, the activation of HER2 through overexpression represents a gradient of activities and depth of addiction and the response to inhibitors follows a similar gradient.
Project description:Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent diseases among women worldwide and is highly associated with cancer-related mortality. Of the four major molecular subtypes, HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) comprise more than 30% of all breast cancers. While the HER2-positive subtype lacks estrogen and progesterone receptors and overexpresses HER2, the TNBC subtype lacks estrogen, progesterone and HER2 receptors. Although advances in molecular biology and genetics have substantially ameliorated breast cancer disease management, targeted therapies for the treatment of estrogen-receptor negative breast cancer patients are still restricted, particularly for TNBC. On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that microRNAs, miRNAs or small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression are involved in diverse biological processes, including carcinogenesis. Moreover, circulating miRNAs in serum/plasma are among the most promising diagnostic/therapeutic tools as they are stable and relatively easy to quantify. Various circulating miRNAs have been identified in several human cancers including specific breast cancer subtypes. This review aims to discuss the role of circulating miRNAs as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers as well as therapeutic targets for estrogen-receptor negative breast cancers, HER2+ and triple negative.
Project description:IntroductionMolecular apocrine (MA) tumors are estrogen receptor (ER) negative breast cancers characterized by androgen receptor (AR) expression. We analyzed a group of 58 transcriptionally defined MA tumors and proposed a new tool to identify these tumors.MethodsWe performed quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) for ESR1, AR, FOXA1 and AR-related genes, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for ER, PR, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2), CK5/6, CK17, EGFR, Ki67, AR, FOXA1 and GCDFP15 and we analyzed clinical features.ResultsMA tumors were all characterized by ESR1(-) AR(+) FOXA1(+) and AR-related genes positive mRNA profile. IHC staining on these tumors showed 93% ER(-), only 58% AR(+) and 90% FOXA1(+). 67% and 57% MA tumors were HER2(3+) and GCDFP15(+), respectively. Almost all MA tumors (94%) had the IHC signature HER2(3+) or GCDFP15(+) but none of the 13 control basal-like (BL) tumors did. Clinically, MA tumors were rather aggressive, with poor prognostic factors.ConclusionMA tumors could be better defined by their qRT-PCR-AR profile than by AR IHC. In addition, we found that HER2 or GCDFP15 protein overexpression is a sensitive and specific tool to differentiate MA from BL in the context of ER negative tumors. A composite molecular and IHC signature could, therefore, help to identify MA tumors in daily practice.
Project description:Background:Although 1% has been used as cut-off for estrogen receptor (ER) positivity, several studies have reported that tumors with ER?<?1% have characteristics similar to those with 1%???ER?<?10%. We hypothesized that in patients with human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer, a cut-off of 10% is more useful than one of 1% in discriminating for both a better pathological complete response (pCR) rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a better long-term outcome with adjuvant hormonal therapy. Our objectives were to identify a percentage of ER expression below which pCR was likely and to determine whether this cut-off value can identify patients who would benefit from adjuvant hormonal therapy. Patients and methods:Patients with stage II or III HER2-negative primary breast cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by definitive surgery between June 1982 and June 2013 were included. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between each variable and pCR. Cox models were used to analyze time to recurrence and overall survival. The recursive partitioning and regression trees method was used to calculate the cut-off value of ER expression. Results:A total of 3055 patients were analyzed. Low percentage of ER was significantly associated with high pCR rate (OR?=?0.99, 95% CI?=?0.986-0.994, P?<?0.001). The recommended cut-off of ER expression below which pCR was likely was 9.5%. Among patients with ER???10% tumors, but not those with 1%?ER?<?10% tumors, adjuvant hormonal therapy was significantly associated with long time to recurrence (HR?=?0.24, 95% CI?=?0.16-0.36, P?<?0.001) and overall survival (HR?=?0.32, 95% CI?=?0.2-0.5, P?<?0.001). Conclusion:Stage II or III HER2-negative primary breast cancer with ER?<?10% behaves clinically like triple-negative breast cancer in terms of pCR and survival outcomes and patients with such tumors may have a limited benefit from adjuvant hormonal therapy. It may be more clinically relevant to define triple-negative breast cancer as HER2-negative breast cancer with?<10%, rather than?<1%, of ER and/or progesterone receptor expression.