Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Exploring the effects of different sample preparation factors on RNA sequencing

ABSTRACT: We investigated the effects of different sample preparation factors on RNA-seq experiments, including RNA concentration, library storage time, and cryopreserved condition, by comparing their sequencing biases, gene expression profiles, and biological function using primary B cell and CD4+ cell blood samples in healthy subjects.

ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens

PROVIDER: GSE110417 | GEO | 2019/02/09

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Exploring the effects of different sample preparation factors on RNA sequencing

Project description:Exploring the effects of different sample preparation factors on RNA sequencing

| PRJNA433678 | ENA

Multi-omic sample preparation

Project description:A single microfluidic device for multi-omics analysis sample preparation

| PRJEB75435 | ENA

multi-omics analysis sample preparation

Project description:A single microfluidic device for multi-omics analysis sample preparation

| PRJEB75436 | ENA

Assessment of RNA-seq Sample Preparation Methodology

Project description:Assessment of RNA-seq Sample Preparation Methodology

| PRJNA862601 | ENA

Assessment of RNA-seq Sample Preparation Methodology

Project description:Assessment of RNA-seq Sample Preparation Methodology

| PRJNA862603 | ENA

Comparison of whole-genome bisulfite sequencing library preparation strategies identifies sources of biases affecting DNA methylation data

Project description:We performed a parallel analysis of commonly used pre- and post-bisulfite WGBS library preparation protocols for their performance and quality of sequencing outputs. Our results show that bisulfite conversion per se generates pronounced sequencing biases, and subsequent fragmentation and amplification steps lead to several-fold overrepresentation of these artefacts. Standard pre-bisulfite library preparation methods lead to a significantly biased genomic sequence representation and a marked overestimation of methylation levels. We have integrated a bias diagnostic tool in the Bismark package and propose that amplification-free and post-bisulfite procedures should become the gold standard for WGBS library preparation.

2017-02-16 | GSE77961 | GEO

Anaerobic preparation study

Project description:Anaerobic preparation study

| PRJEB64928 | ENA

Repli-seq sample preparation using cell sorting with cell-permeant dyes

Project description:DNA replication occurs in a defined temporal order known as the replication-timing (RT) program. RT is regulated during development in discrete chromosomal units, coordinated with transcriptional activity and 3D genome organization. Here, we developed a sample preparation method to measure RT genome-wide that does not require fixation.

2023-11-02 | GSE246516 | GEO

Barley leaf sample preparation

Project description:Barley is an important cereal crop all over the world. Detailed molecular characterization of barley provides the basis for development of improved cultivars, stress and drought-resistant plants. We here present an LC-MS/MS-based proteomics study of barley leaf aimed at optimization of methods to achieve efficient and unbiased trypsin digestion of proteins prior to LC-MS/MS based sequencing and quantification of peptides. We evaluated two spin filter-aided sample preparation protocols using either sodium dodecyl-sulphate (SDS) or sodium deoxycholate (SDC), and three in-solution digestion (ISD) protocols using SDC or trichloroacetic acid/acetone precipitation. The proteomics workflow identified up to 1800 barley proteins based on sequencing of up to 7700 peptides per sample. The two spin filter-based protocols provided a 17-38% higher efficiency than the ISD protocols, including more proteins of low abundance. Among the ISD protocols, a simple one-step reduction and S-alkylation method (OP-ISD) was the most efficient for barley leaf sample preparation; it identified and quantified 1500 proteins and displayed higher peptide-to-protein inference ratio and higher average amino acid sequence coverage of proteins. The two spin filter-aided sample preparation protocols are compatible with TMT labeling for quantitative proteomics studies. They exhibited complementary performance as about 30% of the proteins were identified by either one or the other protocol, but also demonstrated a positive bias for membrane proteins when using SDC as detergent. We provide detailed protocols for efficient barley protein sample preparation for LC-MS/MS-based proteomics studies. Spin filter-based protocols are the most efficient for the preparation of barley leaf samples for MS-based proteomics, however, a simple protocol provides comparable results although with different peptide digestion profile.

2018-09-03 | PXD008938 | Pride

RNA-seq sample preparation kits strongly affect transcriptome profiles of a gas-fermenting bacterium

Project description:Transcriptome analysis via RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has become a standard technique employed across a variety of biological fields of study. This rapid adoption of the RNA-seq approach has been mediated, in part, by the development of various commercial RNA-seq library preparation kits compatible with common next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms. Generally, the essential steps of library preparation such as rRNA depletion and first-strand cDNA synthesis are tailored to a certain group of organisms (e.g. eukaryotes versus prokaryotes) or genomic GC content. Therefore, selection of appropriate commercial products is of crucial importance to capture the transcriptome of interest as closely to the native state as possible without introduction of technical bias. However, researchers rarely have the resources and time to test various commercial RNA-seq kits for their samples. In this work, we report a side-by-side comparison of RNA-seq data from the same Clostridium autoethanogenum input samples obtained using three commercial rRNA removal and strand-specific library construction products by NuGEN Technologies, Qiagen, and Zymo Research, and compare their performance with published data. While all three vendors advertise their products as suitable for prokaryotes, we found significant differences in their performance in terms of rRNA removal, strand-specificity, and, most importantly, transcript abundance distribution profiles. Notably, RNA-seq data obtained with Qiagen products were most similar to published data and delivered the best results in terms of library strandedness and transcript abundance distribution range. Our results highlight the importance of finding appropriate organism-specific workflows and library preparation products for RNA-seq studies.

2022-07-20 | GSE200959 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data