Genome-wide DNA methylation maps of Decitabine and/or Cisplatin treated bladder cancer cells.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE113537 | GEO | 2021/04/23
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:The aim of the present study was to identify novel DNA methylation markers in bladder cancer (BCa) through genome-wide profiling of bladder cancer cell lines and subsequent MSP screening in urine samples. Experimental Design: MBD methylCap/seq was carried out to screen differentially methylated CpG islands using two BCa cell lines (5637 and T24) and two normal bladder mucosa (BM) samples. The top one hundred most hypermethylated targets were screened using Methylation Specific PCR (MSP) in small and big cohort of urine samples from BCa patients and normal controls. The diagnostic performance of the gene panel was further evaluated in different clinical scenarios. Results: In total, 1,627 gene promoter regions hypermethylated in BCa cell line were identified in genomic level methylation profiling. The followed screening procedure in clinical urine sample generated eight genes (VAX1, KCNV1, ECEL1, TMEM26, TAL1, PROX1, SLC6A20, and LMX1A) capable of differentiating BCa from normal control. Subsequent validation in a large sample size enabled the optimisation of 5 methylation targets (VAX1, KCNV1, TAL1, PPOX1 and CFTR) for BCa diagnosis with sensitivity and specificity of 86.32% and 87.13%, respectively. In addition, VAX1 and LMX1A methylation could predict the tumour recurrence. Conclusions: Tumor specific biomarkers of BCa could be established by first performing genome level methylation profiling with cell lines and then screening the potential targets in urine samples. The panel of methylated genes identified was promising for the early non-invasive detection and surveillance of BCa. MBD methylCap/seq was carried out to screen differentially methylated CpG islands using two BCa cell lines (5637 and T24), and two normal bladder tissue mix as control.
2012-04-30 | E-GEOD-33839 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling of human B-ALL cell line SEM after 48 h incubation with DMSO (control), CX-4945 (Silmitasertib), Decitabine (DEC) or combined CX-4945 + DEC treatment. The Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip was used to obtain DNA methylation profiles across approximately 866,895 CpG islands.
2018-02-12 | GSE110454 | GEO
Project description:The epigenetic regulation, for example, DNA methylation, controls the development and differentiation of both tumor cells and immunocytes. Treatment with DNA demethylating agent (such as decitabine) has shown a dramatic clinical benefit in hematological malignancies and solid tumors. However, the influence of epigenetic therapy on host immune system remains unclear. To investigate the effects of low-dose decitabine therapy on T cells, We collected whole blood samples from two solid tumor patients pre and post low-dose decitabine therapy, and detected the expression profiles of PBMCs.
2016-06-30 | E-GEOD-72686 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:We found previously that the effect of decitabine (DAC) on hematopoietic stem cell viability differed between Mll5 wildtype and null cells. We therefore investigated the role of MLL5 expression levels on outcome of AML patients who were treated with decitabine. High MLL5 expressing AML patients have improved overall survival when treated with decitabine. In transformed murine cells, loss of Mll5 was associated with resistance to low-dose decitabine, less frequent promoter methylation, and reduced demethylation upon decitabine treatment. These data suggest a biological link between MLL5 expression and decitabine response involving regulation of DNA methylation. Leukemia cell model was generated by co-transfer of HOXA9 and MEIS1 into Mll5 wildtype or knockout mouse bone marrow cells. MeDIP was performed in Mll5+/+ HOXA9/MEIS1 and Mll5-/- HOXA9/MEIS1 leukemic cells, untreated or treated with 3-day exposure of 20 nM decitabine, triplicate for each condition. MeDIP-enriched DNA was amplified with the GenomePlex Complete Whole Genome Amplification (WGA) Kit (Sigma-Aldrich). DNA from three MeDIP and WGA of each cell type and treatment was pooled for subsequent microarray analysis. The enriched DNA and corresponding input genomic DNA was labeled, hybridized and scanned on Agilent custom mouse promoter microarrays (Agilent-025976 AP_1M_Custom_CH3, assembly build mm9). The methylation value of individual probes was defined by the signal intensity ratio of MeDIP DNA (Cy3) compared to input DNA (Cy5) . Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation coupled with Agilent mouse promoter CpG arrays (MeDIP-chip)
2014-07-01 | E-GEOD-52199 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The DNA hypomethylating drug decitabine maintains normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) self-renewal but induces terminal differentiation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells. To better understand the basis for this contrasting treatment effect, the baseline expression of key lineage-specifying transcription factor (TF) (eg., CEBPa) and key late differentiation TF (CEBPe), was examined in normal, myelodysplastic (MDS) and AML primary cells and cell lines. To appreciate the role of differentiation in hypomethylation of some CpG by decitabine treatment but not others, promoter CpGs, analyzed by microarray and mass spectrometry, were categorized by the direction of methylation change during normal myeloid differentiation. In MDS/AML cells, high expression of CEBPa, relatively low expression of CEBPe (a gene target of CEBPa), hypermethylation of CEBPe promoter CpG, and the methylation pattern at differentiation sensitive promoter CpGs analyzed by microarray, suggested lineage-commitment and aberrant epigenetic repression of late differentiation genes. DNA hypomethylation in response to decitabine was greatest at CpGs that are hypomethylated during normal myeloid differentiation. In contrast, normal HSPC treated with decitabine retained immature morphology, and methylation significantly decreased at CpG that are hypermethylated during myeloid differentiation. Partial differentiation at baseline, and repression of key late differentiation genes by epigenetic means, likely plays a role in methylation and phenotype responses of AML cells treated with decitabine. Bisulphite converted DNA from the 208 samples were hybridised to the Illumina Cancel Panel 1 GPL9183 methylation assay
2011-07-01 | E-GEOD-29047 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Background: Epigenetic modifications such as methylation silencing of genes with CpG-island-associated promoters is frequently observed in cancer. Studies regarding the implications of epigenetic modifications in osteosarcoma (OS) have been limited. The epigenetic drug decitabine is a potential re-activator of silenced genes through de-methylation, and is currently undergoing clinical trials for cancer treatment. No study to date has utilized decitabine to modify gene expression in OS-derived cells to identify gene-specific methylation targets that may have therapeutic importance. The objective of this study was to measure the response of the OS cell line, U-2OS, to decitabine treatment both in vitro and in vivo. Results: Genome-wide screening was used to distinguish decitabine-dependent changes in gene expression in U-2OS and to identify responsive loci with de-methylated CpG regions. U-2OS xenografts were established in the sub-renal capsule of immune-deficient mice to study the effect of decitabine in vivo on tumor growth and differentiation. Genome-wide screening of U-2OS cells in vitro revealed that decitabine treatment at low-dosage (1 µM) caused a significant induction (p<0.0025) in the expression of 88 genes, 13 had a ≥2-fold change, 11 of which had CpG-island-associated promoters. Interestingly, 6 of these 11 were pro-apoptotic genes. 1 µM decitabine resulted in a significant induction of cell death in U-2OS cells in vitro (p<0.05). Decitabine treatment also reduced tumor volume size significantly (p<0.05) in U-2OS in vivo at a 2.5 mg/kg dose. Histological analysis of U-2OS xenograft sections revealed a lower mitotic activity (p<0.0001), a higher bone matrix production (p<0.0001), and higher apoptosis (p = 0.0329) after treatment. The 6 pro-apoptotic genes were also induced to ≥2-fold in vivo. Quantitative Methylation Pyrosequencing (Pyro Q-CpG) showed that 4 pro-apoptotic genes had CpG-island DNA de-methylation as a result of treatment in vitro and in vivo. Conclusion: Our data provide new insights regarding the use of epigenetic modifiers in OS, and have important implications for therapeutic trials involving demethylation drugs. The findings of this study suggest an epigenetic mechanism, whereby OS tumor cells silence expression of pro-apoptotic genes through promoter-CpG methylation, to maintain high proliferation capacity and continuous growth. Keywords: Osteosarcoma, epigenetics, methylation, decitabine
2007-04-05 | GSE7454 | GEO
Project description:Background: Epigenetic modifications such as methylation silencing of genes with CpG-island-associated promoters is frequently observed in cancer. Studies regarding the implications of epigenetic modifications in osteosarcoma (OS) have been limited. The epigenetic drug decitabine is a potential re-activator of silenced genes through de-methylation, and is currently undergoing clinical trials for cancer treatment. No study to date has utilized decitabine to modify gene expression in OS-derived cells to identify gene-specific methylation targets that may have therapeutic importance. The objective of this study was to measure the response of the OS cell line, U-2OS, to decitabine treatment both in vitro and in vivo. Results: Genome-wide screening was used to distinguish decitabine-dependent changes in gene expression in U-2OS and to identify responsive loci with de-methylated CpG regions. U-2OS xenografts were established in the sub-renal capsule of immune-deficient mice to study the effect of decitabine in vivo on tumor growth and differentiation. Genome-wide screening of U-2OS cells in vitro revealed that decitabine treatment at low-dosage (1 µM) caused a significant induction (p<0.0025) in the expression of 88 genes, 13 had a â?¥2-fold change, 11 of which had CpG-island-associated promoters. Interestingly, 6 of these 11 were pro-apoptotic genes. 1 µM decitabine resulted in a significant induction of cell death in U-2OS cells in vitro (p<0.05). Decitabine treatment also reduced tumor volume size significantly (p<0.05) in U-2OS in vivo at a 2.5 mg/kg dose. Histological analysis of U-2OS xenograft sections revealed a lower mitotic activity (p<0.0001), a higher bone matrix production (p<0.0001), and higher apoptosis (p = 0.0329) after treatment. The 6 pro-apoptotic genes were also induced to â?¥2-fold in vivo. Quantitative Methylation Pyrosequencing (Pyro Q-CpG) showed that 4 pro-apoptotic genes had CpG-island DNA de-methylation as a result of treatment in vitro and in vivo. Conclusion: Our data provide new insights regarding the use of epigenetic modifiers in OS, and have important implications for therapeutic trials involving demethylation drugs. The findings of this study suggest an epigenetic mechanism, whereby OS tumor cells silence expression of pro-apoptotic genes through promoter-CpG methylation, to maintain high proliferation capacity and continuous growth. Experiment Overall Design: Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Germany) from duplicate experiments of U-2OS cells at Day3 after treatment with 1 µM decitabine or medium alone (control). In each experiment RNA yields were pooled from two independent cultures per treatment arm to minimize experimental noise. For each case, 10 µg of RNA was labeled and hybridized to the Affymetrix HG-U133A GeneChips using the manufacturerâ??s protocol (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) by the Center of Applied Genomics at the Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, Canada). Data were extracted using the Microarray Suite (MAS) version 5.0 (Affymetrix) and linearly scaled to achieve an average intensity of 150 across each chip. The candidate gene list obtained from the MAS 5.0-extracted data was selected by eliminating genes that were not present in at least one experiment. The arrays were subjected to a pair wise comparison using MAS 5.0, with signal intensities from the no-treatment cells as the baseline. The statistical significance for the change of expression for each probe set between the decitabine treated and control was calculated by the MAS5.0 software. The criteria for gene selection for real-time expression validation analysis was based on the statistically significant up-regulation (p<0.0025) and fold change of â?¥ 2 for expression after decitabine treatment. The gene list was annotated based on the NetAffx data-base (http://www.affymetrix.com/analysis /index.affx) and further verified using the Human Genome Browser data base (http://genome.ucsc.edu/)
2008-06-15 | E-GEOD-7454 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:To identification of key drivers involved in the development of muscle invasive bladder cancer, which displays poor prognosis, we isolated one subpopulation of human 5637 bladder cancer cells with highly invasiveness and the other subpopulation of 5637 cells with low invasiveness by Transwell method. Through proteomic analysis, differentially expressed proteins were displayed.
2018-03-15 | PXD007709 | Pride
Project description:The DNA hypomethylating drug decitabine maintains normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) self-renewal but induces terminal differentiation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells. To better understand the basis for this contrasting treatment effect, the baseline expression of key lineage-specifying transcription factor (TF) (eg., CEBPa) and key late differentiation TF (CEBPe), was examined in normal, myelodysplastic (MDS) and AML primary cells and cell lines. To appreciate the role of differentiation in hypomethylation of some CpG by decitabine treatment but not others, promoter CpGs, analyzed by microarray and mass spectrometry, were categorized by the direction of methylation change during normal myeloid differentiation. In MDS/AML cells, high expression of CEBPa, relatively low expression of CEBPe (a gene target of CEBPa), hypermethylation of CEBPe promoter CpG, and the methylation pattern at differentiation sensitive promoter CpGs analyzed by microarray, suggested lineage-commitment and aberrant epigenetic repression of late differentiation genes. DNA hypomethylation in response to decitabine was greatest at CpGs that are hypomethylated during normal myeloid differentiation. In contrast, normal HSPC treated with decitabine retained immature morphology, and methylation significantly decreased at CpG that are hypermethylated during myeloid differentiation. Partial differentiation at baseline, and repression of key late differentiation genes by epigenetic means, likely plays a role in methylation and phenotype responses of AML cells treated with decitabine.
2011-07-01 | GSE29047 | GEO
Project description:Histone H3 mono-ubiquitination, catalyzed by the RING E3 ubiquitin ligase UHRF1, is appreciated as a docking site for DNMT1 during DNA replication to facilitate DNA methylation maintenance. Its functions beyond this are unknown. Here, we identify simultaneous increases in UHRF1-dependent H3K18ub and SUV39H1/2-dependent H3K9me3 as prominent epigenetic alterations accompanying DNA hypomethylation induced by DNMT1 inhibition. Integrative epigenomics analyses reveal that transient accumulation of hemi-methylated DNA, resulting from incomplete DNA methylation maintenance, stimulates UHRF1-dependent H3K18ub at CpG islands that nucleates new domains of H3K9me3 and impedes PRC2 activity in these genomic regions. Notably, H3K18ub enhances the methyltransferase activity of SUV39H1/2, leading to increased H3K9me3 at these CpG island promoters. Blocking H3K18ub-dependent SUV39H1/2 activity enhances the efficacy of DNMT1 inhibitors. Collectively, these findings reveal a novel histone ubiquitination-methylation crosstalk mechanism that reinforces heterochromatin states in the absence of DNA methylation and proposes new strategies for improving cancer epigenetic therapy.
2024-12-02 | PXD049993 | Pride