Dataset Information

Enhancer Release and Retargeting” Activates Disease Susceptibility Genes (GRO-Seq)

ABSTRACT: Purpose: We used Global run-on sequencing, a gold standard assay to measure transcriptional activity to examine the change of genome transcription in the absence of RAD21 subunit of cohesin, a critical chromatin architectural protein complex. In particularl, we tested how the loss of chromatin looping regulator cohesin would impact the enhancers and their target promoter transcription. Methods: Transfection of small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) into MCF-7 cells was performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Life technologies) following manufacturer's instructions. For all experiments, two rounds of siRNA transfection (40nM each time) were performed to achieve higher efficiency. The siRNAs used in this study include: Qiagen Negative Control siRNA (Qiagen Cat# 1027310) and/or Sigma Mission siRNA universal control #2 (SIC002); siRAD21 (Sigma SASI_Hs02_00341219 and SASI_Hs01_00195799). The transfected MCF7 cells were subjected to GRO-seq experiments. GRO-Seq experiments were performed as previously reported (Li et al., 2013, Nature). Briefly, ~10-20 millions of MCF-7 cells were washed 3 times with cold PBS and then sequentially swelled in swelling buffer (10mM Tris-Cl pH7.5, 2mM MgCl2, 3mM CaCl2) for 5 min on ice, harvested, and lysed in lysis buffer (swelling buffer plus 0.5% NP-40 and 10% glycerol). The resultant nuclei were washed one more time with 10mL lysis buffer and finally re-suspended in 100uL of freezing buffer (50mM Tris-Cl pH8.3, 40% glycerol, 5mM MgCl2, 0.1mM EDTA). For the run-on assay, re-suspended nuclei were mixed with an equal volume of reaction buffer (10mM Tris-Cl pH 8.0, 5mM MgCl2, 1mM DTT, 300mM KCl, 20 units of SUPERase-IN, 1% sarkosyl, 500uM ATP, GTP, and Br-UTP, 2uM CTP) and incubated for 5 min at 30°C . The resultant nuclear-run-on RNA (NRO-RNA) was then extracted with TRIzol LS reagent (Life Technologies) following manufacturer’s instructions. NRO-RNA was fragmented to ~300-500nt by alkaline base hydrolysis on ice and followed by treatment with DNase I and Antarctic phosphatase. These fragmented Br-UTP labeled nascent RNA was then immunoprecipitated with an anti-BrdU argarose beads (Sc32323ac, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) in binding buffer (0.5XSSPE, 1mM EDTA, 0.05% tween) for 3 hrs at 4°C with rotation. Subsequently, T4 PNK was used to repair the end of the immunoprecipitated BrU-NRO-RNA, at 37°C for 1hr. The RNA was extracted and precipitated using acidic phenol-chloroform. cDNA synthesis was performed as per a published method (54) with few modifications. The RNA fragments were subjected to poly-A tailing reaction by poly-A polymerase (NEB) for 30 min at 37°C. Subsequently, reverse transcription was performed using oNTI223 primer and superscript III RT kit (Life Technologies). The cDNA products were separated on a 10% polyacrylamide TBE-urea gel and only those migrated between ~100-500bp were excised and recovered by gel extraction. After that, the first-strand cDNA was circularized by CircLigase (Epicentre) and re-linearized by APE1 (NEB). Re-linearized single strand cDNA (sscDNA) was separated by a 10% polyacrylamide TBE gel as described above and the product of needed size was excised (~170-400bp) for gel extraction. Finally, sscDNA template was amplified by PCR (usually between 10-14 PCR cycles) using the Phusion High-Fidelity enzyme (NEB) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The resulted library was subjected to deep sequencing. Results: Using an optimized data analysis workflow, we generated three biological replicates of GRO-seq in the presence or absence of cohesin, and with or without treatment by estrogen.

ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens

PROVIDER: GSE115603 | GEO | 2020/08/31

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Project description:Glioblastoma stem cells (TS-543) were harvested and cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde for 10 mins at room temperature. The cells were lysed using SDS Lysis buffer for ChIP (1% SDS, 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8). The lysate was then sonicated for 25 cycles at 30% amplitude (15 s ON and 45 s OFF). The sonicated samples were then diluted in ChIP dilution buffer (0.01% SDS, 1% Triton-X-100, 1.2 mM EDTA, 16.7 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 167 mM NaCl) and used for the immunoprecipitation with H3K27ac (Abcam, Ab4729), H2AZ (Active motive, cat#39113) and H3K27ac (Abcam cat#ab8580). After an over-night incubation with antibody, the bound DNA was washed sequentially with low salt wash buffer (0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X 100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 150 mM NaCl), high salt wash buffer (0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 500 mM NaCl), LiCl wash buffer (0.25 M LiCl, 1% NP40, 1%deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8) and TE wash buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 1 mM EDTA) to remove non-specific sequences and eluted in the elution buffer (84 mg NaHCO3, 1 ml 10% SDS, 9 ml H2O). Then the samples were reverse cross-linked using NaCl at 65°C overnight. The eluted DNA was purified and used for library preparation. Library preparation was performed as previously described as described in Bowman et al. BMC Genomics 2013. Briefly, end repair with NEBNext End Repair enzyme (NEB, E6050) and clean-up with 2.4x volume AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, A63880). A-tailing with Klenow Fragment (NEB, M0212) and purified with 2.4x volume AMPure XP beads. Adapter ligation reactions contained annealed universal adapter and T4 rapid ligase (NEB, B0202) and clean-up with 1.8x volume AMPure XP beads. Chromatin was amplified using KAPA Real-time Library Amplification Kit (KAPABIOSYSTEMS, KK2701) with universal primer and barcoded primer. Amplified chromatin was purified with QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen) and sequenced paired-end with Illumina NextSeq 500.

Project description:The discovery of small open reading frames (smORFs) encoding for polypeptides (SEPs; <100aa) highlights that the coding capacity of the genomes has been underestimated. Most ORF-finding algorithms have historically set a minimum threshold length of 100 aa. As consequence, some transcripts encoding for SEPs, were erroneously discarded or classified as non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). With this experiments we try to experimentally assess the existence and complexity of these small proteins. The experimental design includes: After growing each Mycoplasma for 6h at 37°C, cells were washed twice with PBS and lysed with 700 µl of Qiazol buffer. Then, samples were lysed with 700 µl of Qiazol buffer. RNA extractions were performed by using the miRNeasy mini Kit (Qiagen) following the instructions of the manufacturer. Libraries for RNA-seq were prepared following directional RNA-seq library preparation and sequencing. Briefly, 1 µg of total RNA was fragmented to ~100-150 nt using NEB Next Magnesium RNA Fragmentation Module (ref. E6150S, NEB). Treatments with Antarctic phosphatase (ref. M0289S, NEB) and PNK (ref. M0201S, NEB) were performed in order to make the 5’ and 3’ ends of the RNA available for adapter ligation. Samples were further processed using the TruSeq small RNA Sample Prep Kit (ref. RS-200-0012, Illumina) according to the manufacturer's protocol. In summary, 3’ adapters and subsequently 5’ adapters were ligated to the RNA. cDNA was synthesized using reverse transcriptase (SuperScript II, ref. 18064-014, Invitrogen) and a specific primer (RNA RT Primer) complementary to the 3’ RNA adapter. cDNA was further amplified by PCR using indexed adapters supplied in the kit. Finally, size selection of the libraries was performed using 6% Novex® TBE Gels (ref. EC6265BOX, Life Technologies). Fragments with insert sizes of 100 to 130 bp were cut from the gel, and cDNA was precipitated and eluted in 10 µl of elution buffer. Double-stranded templates were cluster amplified and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2000.

Project description:Bacteria was grown at 30C in 3 different conditions, i.e. SYN (syngas and minimal medium- ATCC no 1789), AC (0.3% acetate in minimal medium- ATCC no 1789) and TSB (tryptic soy broth). After harvesting by centrifugation, O. carboxidovorans pellets (1g) were lysed in 100 mM Tris-Cl pH 8.0, 2% Triton X-100, 2.6 mg/ml sodium azide, 8 mM PMSF by sonication on ice (4 pulses of 15 s duration each). For each condition of growth 4 samples (1g pellets) were separately treated (i.e. lysed and processed further). The supernatants were treated with 50% cold TCA, and the precipitated protein washed with acetone. The pellets were resuspended in solubilization buffer (7M urea, 20 mM tris-Cl, pH 8.0, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM MgCl2, 4% CHAPS), and protein concentration was determined using the Plus One 2-D Quant Kit (Amersham) following the manufacturers instructions. Protein samples from each treatment were stored at -80 C. One hundred micrograms of each protein sample was resuspended in 0.1 M ammonium bicarbonate, 5% HPLC grade ACN, reduced in 5 mM DTT (65 C, 5 min), alkylated in 10 mM iodoacetamide (30 C, 30 min), and then trypsin digested until there was no visible pellet (1:50 w/w 37 C, 16 h). Peptides were desalted using a peptide microtrap (Michrom BioResources, Auburn, CA) and eluted using a 0.1% TFA, 95% ACN solution. Desalted peptides were dried in a vacuum centrifuge and resuspended in 20 ?l of 0.1% formic acid. Peptides were separated by strong cation exchange (SCX) liquid chromatography (LC) followed by reverse phase (RP) LC coupled directly in line with electrospray ionization (ESI) tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). 2DLC ESI MS/MS was done exactly as described (1). All searches were done using TurboSEQUEST (Bioworks Browser 3.2; Thermo Electron). Mass spectra and tandem mass spectra were searched against all annotated proteins from the strain OM5 including all the annotated plasmid-encoded proteins. Cysteine carbamidomethylation and methionine oxidation (single and double) were included in the search strategy. We used the reverse database functionality in Bioworks 3.2 and searched MS2 data against a reversed OM5 database using identical search criteria.

Project description:Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells pooled from several donors, were purchased from Lonza and cultured in FBS reduced Endopan 3 media. HUVEC cells of passages 5-10 were used for experiments. MPO treatment was performed with protein purified from human blood (Planta) and at 1 μg/ml final concentration. Immunoprecipitation was performed from isolated nuclei (after 8 hours MPO treatment), non-treated cells were used as negative control. For immunoprecipitation antibody against MPO (Calbiochem, 475915) was used. Cell nuclei were isolated by incubating cells for 15 min on ice in NIB buffer (15 mM Tris-HCL pH 7.5, 60 mM KCl, 15 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 250 mM sucrose) containing 0.3% NP-40. Nuclei were pelleted for 5 min 800 × g at 4 °C, washed twice in the same buffer, lysed for 10 min on ice in IP buffer (150 mM LiCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% Empigen) freshly supplemented with 2 mM sodium vanadate, 1× protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche), PMSF (10 µl), 0,5 mM DTT, and 50 units Benzonase per ml of IP buffer, before preclearing cell debris by centrifugation at >15,000 × g at 4 °C. Finally, 1 mg of the lysate was incubated with anti-MPO antisera overnight at 4 °C. Magnetic beads (Active Motif) were then washed once with 1× PBS-Tween and combined with the antibody-lysate mixture. Following a 2-h incubation at 4 °C, beads were separated on a magnetic rack and washed 5×, 5 min each in wash buffer (150 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.5% NP-40) and another two times in wash buffer without NP-40. Captured proteins were predigested and eluted from the beads using digestion buffer (2 M Urea, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 1 mM DTT) supplemented with trypsin and eluted from the beads with elution buffer (2 M Urea, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 5 mM chloroacetamide) supplemented with trypsin and LysC, before subjected to mass-spectrometry on a Q-Exactive Plus Orbitrap platform coupled to an EASY nLC (Thermo Scientific). Peptides were loaded in solvent A (0.1% formic acid in water) onto an in-house packed analytical column (50 cm length, 75 µm I.D., filled with 2.7 µm Poroshell EC120 C1; Agilent)

Project description:Samples were purchased from Clontech as mRNA. Hybridization material was generated through a random-priming amplification procedure (RP-AMP) using primers with a random sequence at the 3' end and a fixed motif at the 5' end. shDNP256 (first strand synthesis): 5'- TAG ATG CTG TTG NNN NNN NNN -3' shT7N9 (second strand synthesis): 5'- ACT ATA GGG AGA NNN NNN NNN -3' 1.5 g of mRNA was reverse-transcribed with Superscript II and the DP256 random primer for 20 minutes at 42 C (10 mM DTT, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 75 mM KCl, 8 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dNTPs, 5 U/ l Superscript II). The RNA was degraded with the addition of 20 l volume of 0.5N sodium hydroxide and 0.25 M EDTA for 20 minutes at 65 C. The single stranded cDNA was purified using a commercial kit (Qiagen Qiaquick). The resulting product of single stranded cDNA was placed in its entirety in a second strand reaction. Second strand synthesis reactions utilized shT7N9 random primer and the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase utilizing standard reaction conditions (37 C for 60 minutes, 0.2 mM DTT, 2.1 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.9, 2.1 mM MgCl2, 10.7 mM NaCl, 1.07 mM dNTPs, 0.1U/ l Klenow), followed by another Qiaquick purification. Multiple polymerase chain reactions were run using 0.15 g of double stranded DNA and standard reaction conditions. Amplification was achieved using 10 cycles of PCR with the DP256 and T7 primers (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.4, 50 mM KCl, 0.01 mM dNTPs, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.01 U/ l Taq Polymerase) DP256: 5'- GTT CGA GAC CTC TAG ATG CTG TTG -3' T7: 5'- AA TTA ATA CGA CTC ACT ATA GGG AGA -3' followed by Qiaquick purification. Further amplification was achieved using in vitro transcription reactions with X0.5 g dsDNA and T7 RNA Polymerase (7.5 mM DTT, 40 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 14.25 mM MgCl2, 10 mM NaCl, 2 mM Spermidine, 125 U/ml RNAguard, 2.5 mM dNTPs, 15 U/ml IPPase, 25kU/ml T7 Polymerase) for 16 hours at 42 C. The cRNA was purified (RNeasy) and reverse transcribed using Superscript and random 9-mers and amino-allyl dUTP (42 C for 20 minutes, 10 mM DTT, 50mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 75 mM KCl, 8 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dNTPs, 0.5 mM aa-dUTP, 5 U/ l Superscript II). The cDNA for each channel was covalently coupled separately with Cy5 and Cy3 monoreactive fluors, respectively, in 1M sodium bicarbonate, pH 9.0, followed by quenching with 4.0 M hydroxylamine. The Cy5 and Cy3 labelled cDNAs were purified with a QIAquick PCR purification kit and the percentage dye incorporation and total cDNA yield was determined spectrophotometrically. Cy5 and Cy3 labelled cDNAs were combined and added to 2 mls 30% formamide with Herring Sperm DNA for hybridization to the microarray. Further details can be found in Castle et al., Genome Biol 2003;4(10):R66, http://genomebiology.com/2003/4/10/R66 , Roberts CJ et al., Science 2000, 287:873-880, and Schadt, Edwards, et al., unpublished. Normalization of single channel data is described in Ying, et al., "Identification of Chromosomal Regions Containing Transcribed Sequences Using Microarrays and Computational Methods" , 2003 Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Biopharmaceutical Section [CD-ROM], Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, 2003. Briefly, an invariant set of probes was selected based on their intensity ranks. Then, a LOESS regression model was fit for Cy5 vs. Cy3 intensities for all probes in the invariant set. Finally, for all probes on the array the Cy5 intensities were normalized to the corresponding Cy3 intensities using prediction values from the regression model. Note that the normalized intensity values given here were used for all analyses reported in the accompanying paper. The ratio values reported here were not used for the analysis described in the manuscript and are not calculated from the normalized intensity values given below. Keywords: other

Project description:2×10^7 HL60 cells were treated with 10 uM ATRA for 2 and 5 days, and conducted Hi-C to study the chromosomal architecture. Cells were fixed by 1% formaldehyde (v/v) for 15 min at room temperature (RT) with slowly rotation. Cells were lysed by 550 μl lysis buffer (500 μl 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 10 mM NaCl, 0.2% Igepal CA-630 and 50 μl protease inhibitors) using a homogenizer, and harvested the chromatin at 5,000 rpm and washed twice. The pellet was added 1% SDS and incubated at 65 oC for 10 min, then quenched by Triton X-100. The chromatin was digested by 600 U MboI (NEB, Ipswich, USA) at 37 oC overnight. The next day, enzymes were inactivated by 10% SDS at 65 oC for 30 min, and the restriction fragment overhangs were filled in using biotin-14-dCTP and Klenow at 37 oC for 45 min, and the ligation was conducted in 7.61 ml ligation mix (745 μl 10% Triton X-100, 745 μl 10x ligation buffer (500 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 100 mM MgCl2, 100 mM DTT), 80 μl 10 mg/ml BSA, 80 μl 100 mM ATP and 5.96 ml water) for 4 h at 16°C. The blunt-end Hi-C ligation was sonicated and pull down by streptavidin beads, then purified by ethanol. Hi-C library was prepared for paired ending sequencing using NEBNext® UltraTM DNA Library Prep Kit for Illuina® (NEB). For regular 3C ligation, after enzymes inactivation, 10 μl 1 U/μl T4 DNA ligase was added to incubate at 16°C overnight. The interaction was detected by qPCR using the specific 3C primers (Table 1) followed by DNA purification. Hi-C was conducted in PE-150. An iterative method for Hi-C mapping with initial length 30bp, if it fails to map uniquely, the next round of mapping for additional 20 bp continued, this procedure lasts until the full read length reaches 150bp. The Hi-C reads were mapped to the human reference genome (assembly GRCh38) using bowtie2 (v2.2.9). The reads mapped to the same restriction fragment, the reads less than 500bp and PCR duplicates were all removed. Hi-C contact maps were normalized using ICE.

Dataset Information

Enhancer Release and Retargeting” Activates Disease Susceptibility Genes (GRO-Seq)

Dataset's files

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets