Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Single-molecule nascent RNA sequencing reveals regulatory domain architecture ant promoters and enhancers

ABSTRACT: CoPRO adapts PRO-cap for paired end sequencing, and includes a total of three different libraries that were enriched for either capped nascent RNAs only, uncapped nascent RNAs only, or both. With paired end sequencing, each read tells us where an RNA polymerase molecule initiated, and then where its active site is located. Comparison of the libraries for different capping states allows us identify the precise location of pausing, and of where nascent RNAs become capped across the tens of thousands of initiation sites that we detect. The paired nature of the data enabled identification of sites of transcription initiation with unprecedented precision: we could use the pattern of pausing and elongation as a sensitive way of calling real initiation sites, and filter out termination by comparing capped and uncapped treatments. Because CoPRO maps nascent RNA, it is not affected by the post-transcriptional stability of the initiation and pausing events detected. Thus, it puts non-coding transcription (such as eRNAs and upstream divergent RNAs) on an equal footing with longer lived RNAs like mRNA and lncRNAs. With our comprehensive maps of transcription initiation, we are able to compare the architecture of initiation sites with other features of the genome. For this purpose, we chose human K562 cells for direct comparison with dozens of publically available genome-wide datasets.

ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus Homo sapiens

PROVIDER: GSE116472 | GEO | 2018/07/02

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

PRO-cap from K562 (ENCSR756TPG)

Project description:CoPRO experiment. A run-on assay was performed on captured nascent RNA with cap state selection. In this experiment, both capped and uncapped nascent RNA was selected and no PCR amplification was done. For data usage terms and conditions, please refer to http://www.genome.gov/27528022 and http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/ENCODE/ENCODE_Data_Use_Policy_for_External_Users_03-07-14.pdf

2022-12-04 | GSE219707 | GEO

PRO-cap from K562 (ENCSR149ZRX)

Project description:CoPRO experiment. A run-on assay was performed on captured nascent RNA with cap state selection. In this experiment, both capped and uncapped nascent RNA was selected and PCR amplification was performed before sequencing. For data usage terms and conditions, please refer to http://www.genome.gov/27528022 and http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/ENCODE/ENCODE_Data_Use_Policy_for_External_Users_03-07-14.pdf

2022-12-04 | GSE219507 | GEO

PRO-cap from K562 (ENCSR882DWM)

Project description:CoPRO experiment. A run-on assay was performed on captured nascent RNA with cap state selection. In this experiment, only uncapped nascent RNA was selected and no PCR amplification was done. For data usage terms and conditions, please refer to http://www.genome.gov/27528022 and http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/ENCODE/ENCODE_Data_Use_Policy_for_External_Users_03-07-14.pdf

2022-12-04 | GSE219876 | GEO

PRO-cap from K562 (ENCSR114HGS)

Project description:CoPRO experiment. A run-on assay was performed on captured nascent RNA with cap state selection. In this experiment, only uncapped nascent RNA was selected and PCR amplification was performed before sequencing. For data usage terms and conditions, please refer to http://www.genome.gov/27528022 and http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/ENCODE/ENCODE_Data_Use_Policy_for_External_Users_03-07-14.pdf

2022-12-04 | GSE219473 | GEO

PRO-cap from K562 (ENCSR604EBH)

Project description:CoPRO experiment. A run-on assay was performed on captured nascent RNA with cap state selection. In this experiment, only capped nascent RNA was selected and no PCR amplification was done. For data usage terms and conditions, please refer to http://www.genome.gov/27528022 and http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/ENCODE/ENCODE_Data_Use_Policy_for_External_Users_03-07-14.pdf

2022-12-04 | GSE219495 | GEO

PRO-cap from K562 (ENCSR261KBX)

Project description:CoPRO experiment. A run-on assay was performed on captured nascent RNA with cap state selection. In this experiment, only capped nascent RNA was selected and PCR amplification was performed before sequencing. For data usage terms and conditions, please refer to http://www.genome.gov/27528022 and http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/ENCODE/ENCODE_Data_Use_Policy_for_External_Users_03-07-14.pdf

2022-12-04 | GSE219647 | GEO

RNA Polymerase II Pausing Can Be Retained or Acquired During Activation of Genes Involved in the Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition

Project description:Promoter-proximal RNA polymerase II (Pol II) pausing is implicated in the regulation of gene transcription. However, the mechanisms of pausing including its dynamics during transcriptional responses remain to be fully understood. We performed global analysis of short capped RNAs and Pol II Chromatin Immunoprecipitation sequencing in MCF-7 breast cancer cells to map Pol II pausing across the genome, and used permanganate footprinting to specifically follow pausing during transcriptional activation of several genes involved in the Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition (EMT). We find that the gene for EMT master regulator Snail (SNAI1), but not Slug (SNAI2), shows evidence of Pol II pausing before activation. Transcriptional activation of the paused SNAI1 gene is accompanied by a further increase in Pol II pausing signal whereas activation of non-paused SNAI2 gene results in the acquisition of a typical pausing signature. The increase in pausing signal reflects increased transcription initiation without changes in Pol II pausing. Activation of the heat shock HSP70 gene involves pausing release that speeds up Pol II turnover, but does not change pausing location. We suggest that Pol II pausing is retained during transcriptional activation and can further undergo regulated release in a signal-specific manner. Untreated MCF-7 cells were analyzed for the distribution of Pol II using ChIP-sequencing with Anti-Pol II N-20 antibody (two independent biological replicates, A, B), and for the distribution of paused RNA polymerase II by sequencing of short capped RNAs (scRNAs) prepared from nuclei (three independent biological replicates, 1-3). All samples were sequenced on a MiSeq instrument in paired-end format

2015-03-27 | E-GEOD-67041 | biostudies-arrayexpress

The landscape of RNA polymerase II transcription initiation in C. elegans reveals a novel regulatory architecture

Project description:It has recently been shown that RNA Polymerase II transcription is far more extensive than previously thought, much of it not associated with protein-coding genes. To investigate this phenomenon, we determined the genome-wide landscape of RNA Polymerase II transcription initiation and elongation in C. elegans. We identify 73,500 distinct clusters of transcription initiation and find that initiation is often bidirectional. Strikingly, the majority of initiation events occur in regions with enhancer-like chromatin signatures. We also assign transcription initiation sites to 7691 protein coding genes, the majority previously unknown because of trans-splicing. Through mapping RNA PolII initiation (short capped RNAs) and elongation (long capped RNAs), we provide identification of transcription start sites.

2013-03-29 | E-GEOD-42819 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Enhancers predominantly control transcription initiation [scaRNA-seq]

Project description:Gene transcription occurs via a cycle of linked events including initiation, promoter proximal pausing and elongation of RNA polymerase II (Pol 2). A key question is how do transcriptional enhancers influence these events to control gene expression? Here we have used a new approach to quantify transcriptional initiation and pausing in-vivo, while simultaneously identifying transcription start sites (TSSs) and pause-sites (TPSs). When analysed in parallel with nascent RNA-seq, these data show that differential gene expression is achieved predominantly via changes in transcription initiation rather than Pol 2 pausing or elongation. Using genetically engineered mouse models deleted for specific enhancers we show that these elements control gene expression via Pol 2 recruitment and/or initiation rather than via promoter proximal pause release. Using genome-wide analysis we show that enhancers, in general, control gene expression at the stage of Pol 2 recruitment and initiation rather than via pausing.

2021-02-03 | GSE138358 | GEO

Enhancers predominantly control transcription initiation [ATAC-seq]

2021-02-03 | GSE138357 | GEO