Transcriptional profiling of rice inflorescence meristem at the secondary panicle branch developmental stage of BILs from a cross between Koshihikari (japonica) and Habataki (indica)
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Oryza sativa
PROVIDER: GSE128061 | GEO | 2021/03/01
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Bronchial Epithelial Cells were isolated processed as described (Chu et al., 2002 and Zhao et al., 2011). The objective of the study was to identify differentially expressed genes between normal control (NC), mild-moderate asmathic (notSA) and severe asthmatic (SA) patients. For demographics data, contact Dr.Sally Wenzel (wenzelse@upmc.edu) Bronchoscopy with endobronchial epithelial brushing was performed as previously described (Chu et al., 2002; Zhao et al., 2011). The bronchial brushings generally comprised >90% epithelial cells and were placed into Trizol for mRNA analysis. Total RNA extracted using Trizol according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cy3-CTP labeled RNA was prepared according to the standard Agilent protocol from 50ng total RNA. Labeled RNA was hybridized for 17 hr at 65 C on Agilent gene expression array. Arrays were washed according to the manufacturer's protocol. Slides were scanned immediately after washing on the Agilent DNA Microarray Scanner (G2505B) using one color scan setting for 4X44K array slides. Agilent Feature Extraction v10.7.3.1 was used with default parameters. Normalized signal intensity data are presented in the matrix. The data set was normalized by cyclic-LOESS with use of Bioconductor package as described previously (Wu W et. al. 2005)
2014-11-14 | E-GEOD-63142 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The aim of this study was to use NGS RNAseq deep-sequencing in order to characterize the polyadenylated mRNAs and lncRNAs expressed in LNCaP cells treated with androgen hormone compared with untreated LNCaP cells (GSE79301). Trimmed reads were mapped using the hg19 genome with TopHat v.2.0.12 and Bowtie v.2.2.3. The assembly was guided by a custom GTF file created with transcripts fromhuman lncRNA annotations from GENCODE v19 (Harrow, Frankish et al.2012) and those already annotated as lincRNAs in (Cabili, Trapnell et al. 2011; Prensner, Iyer et al. 2011; Hangauer, Vaughn et al. 2013). The diferencial expression was calculated by the sum of exon read count per gene with HTSeq (Anders, Pyl et al. 2015), followed by a DESeq2 analysis (Love, Huber et al. 2014).
2017-12-31 | GSE102305 | GEO
Project description:454 dataset for Hosia, et al. Torstensson et al. Dinasquet et al.
| PRJEB7907 | ENA
Project description:Mouse ErythroLeukaemic (MEL) cell lines were maintained in DMEM<br>supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and penicillin/streptomycin. MEL<br>cells in the log phase of growth (0.5 to 1 millions cells / mL) were<br>induced to differentiate with 2% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) for four days.<br>Total RNA was isolated in triplicate from non-induced and DMSO-induced MEL<br>cells using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Purity and quality of isolated RNA<br>were assessed by RNA 6000 Nano assay on a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent<br>Technologies, Santa 6 Clara, CA). All samples showed a RIN>8 and were all<br>used for subsequent labeling. RNA (300 ng) was used for production of<br>end-labelled biotinylated ssDNA. Labelled ssDNA was hybridized to the<br>GeneChip Mouse Gene 1.0 ST array oligonucleotide microarray (Affymetrix,<br>Santa Clara, CA) according to manufacturers recommendations. To examine<br>the quality of the various arrays, measured intensity values were analyzed<br>using Gene Expression Console (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). The analyses<br>indicated a high quality of all samples and overall comparability. The<br>microarray data was normalized by quantile normalization, and followed by<br>a summarization using Tukeys median polish algorithm (Irizarry et al.,<br>2003) in Expression Console from Affymetrix (Santa Clara, CA). Data was<br>further processed using packages within the Bioconductor project in the R<br>statistical programming environment (Gentleman et al., 2004). In order to<br>normalize between experimental batches and receive a dataset with variance<br>independent of absolute expression levels data were renormalized applying<br>vsn2 function (Huber et al., 2002). The log2 intensities for each probe<br>were used for further analysis. Differentially expressed genes were<br>determined applying the limma Bioconductor package and using the functions<br>lmFit and eBayes with default settings. Resulting p-values were adjusted<br>for multiple testing according to Benjamini-Hochberg (Hochberg and<br>Benjamini, 1990). All calculations were performed in the R statistical<br>programming environment (Huber et al., 2002) version 2.8.0. Hierarchical<br>clustering (Eisen et al., 1998) was performed using MeV4.0.01 (Saeed et<br>al., 2003) applying euclidean distance and average linkage.
2010-08-02 | E-MEXP-2454 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:These files contain the normalized and raw count abundances miRNA for aSAH patients. These abundances were obtained using Next-Generation Sequencing after selection of the miRNA in the RNA biobank. In total, there are 28 VSP- and 28 VSP+ patients for two-time points. Normalized data were obtained by applying size factor and VSN normalizations as described in Pulcrano-Nicolas et al. Stroke 2018. Raw count data corresponding to the raw abundances of miRNA in aSAH patients.
| EGAD00001004185 | EGA
Project description:Dichloromethane (DCM) extracts of aerial parts and roots of Waltheria indica analyzed in UHPLC-MS/MS in positive ionization mode. .raw, .mzML and MzMine2 processed files(spectra .mgf and feature table .csv) are available.
References:
Cretton, Sylvian, Stéphane Dorsaz, Antonio Azzollini, Quentin Favre-Godal, Laurence Marcourt, Samad Nejad Ebrahimi, Francine Voinesco, et al. 2016. “Antifungal Quinoline Alkaloids from Waltheria Indica.” Journal of Natural Products 79 (2): 300–307.
Cretton, S., L. Breant, L. Pourrez, C. Ambuehl, L. Marcourt, S. N. Ebrahimi, M. Hamburger, et al. 2014. “Antitrypanosomal Quinoline Alkaloids from the Roots of Waltheria Indica.” Journal of Natural Products 77 (10): 2304–11.
2021-12-06 | MSV000088521 | MassIVE
Project description:Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments were conducted as previously described (Ito et al, 2013) using anti-H3K4me3 (Millipore, #07-473), anti-H3K4me1 (Abcam, #ab8895), or anti-Kdm5C (Iwase et al., 2016). Hippocampi derived from two different animals were pooled together for each sample and two independent biological replicates per condition were sequenced according to manufacturer instructions in a HiSeq2500 apparatus (Illumina, Inc). Information on library preparation method, size of the libraries, and mapping to reference genome can be found in Supplementary Material accompanying the manuscript. ChIP-seq reads were aligned to the mouse genome (Mus_musculus.GRCm.38.83) using bowtie2 (v2.2.9) (Langmead and Salzberg, 2012) and further processed using samtools (v1.3.1) (Li et al., 2009). Peak calling was performed using MACS2 (v2.1.0) (Zhang et al., 2008) with default parameters except for Kdm5c that were as follows: -q 0.01 --nomodel --extsize 131 --broad --broad-cutoff 0.1. Read counts on aligned bam files were performed using Rsubread (v1.22.3) (Liao et al., 2014). Differential peak methylation analysis for H3K4me3 chromatin mark was performed using DESeq2 (v1.10.0) (Love et al., 2014) of the bioconductor suite (Huber et al., 2015) in the R (v3.3) statistical computing platform. For consideration of differentially methylated regions between conditions, we used adjusted p-value < 0.05 as indicated in the manuscript.
2017-08-18 | GSE85873 | GEO
Project description:In rice, gene expression profiling under different stresses have been carried out earlier through microarrays and SAGE (Kawasaki et al., 2001; Rabbani et al., 2003,;. Yazaki et al., 2003, 2004; Walia et al., 2005; Zhou et al., 2005; Jiao et al., 2005; Zhou, 2007; Wang, et al., 2007)). The results reported so far were mostly derived from different stress treatments, array formats, species, tissue types, and time courses, which make it difficult for direct comparison among studies. Also, most of the stress experiments on expression profiles were conducted under laboratory, growth chamber or field grown plants subjected to stress in laboratory conditions, usually by inducing stress with exogenous compounds such as abscisic acid (ABA) or gibberellin (GA) genes (Yazaki et al., 2003, 2004; Rabbani et al., 2003), salt (Kawasaki et al., 2001; Rabbani et al., 2003; Walia et al., 2005), organ specific gene expression under high salinity (Jiao et al., 2005) and drought (Zhou et al., 2007), comparison with different cultivars (Wang et al., 2007) and other environmental stresses such as cold and drought (Rabbani et al., 2003; Zhou et al., 2005). However, such laboratory, growth chamber grown plants or field grown plants subjected to stress under laboratory conditions significantly differ from the field stress conditions and therefore the resultant plant response may not truly represent the actual stress conditions prevailing on field. This has been extensively reviewed by Mittler, 2006 and the need for utilizing data from multiple stress experiments for developing plants resistant to stress has been focused. The review also focuses on evaluating farmers experiences in stress management and kinds of stress that a plant is subjected prior to taking up research on stress resistances has been of significant importance. In the present study, to bridge the gap between the available data on drought stress and the gene regulation under field drought conditions has been paid attention. The outcome of this data will give new leads for breeders to design strategies to develop plants resistant to drought without much loss in yield. In the present study experiments were conducted under different field capacities using a rainout shelter to minimizing the effects of drought induction due to rains. The microarray analysis is thus expected to throw light on stress responsive gene expression in field drought conditions. Till now, to our knowledge there have been no reports on gene expression in rice under field drought conditions. Further, there is no data available on gene expression profiling during various stages of plant growth in leaf and panicle tissues under different levels of water stress. Here, we have focused on generating stress responsive gene (SRG) expression profiles in field drought conditions through the entire life cycle of rice plant. Optimal drought simulation was achieved by conducting a drought stress experiment and validated by a series of dry runs. The main reason for evaluating gene expression under drought in field condition is as drought itself is not limited to water stress but various other factors, such as heat, humidity, hot winds, and long day lengths effect the gene regulation. All these are likely to trigger common pathways that are also a part of drought stress response and therefore significantly affect the expression profiles. In the present study, field drought stress was initiated from 31 days after germination and transplantation to the field at 100%, 60%, 40% and 15% field capacities designated as A1, A2, A3, and A4. It took 7 days for the onset of the actual drought for the experimental plots to reach to their designated field capacities from 100% FC. Samples were collected from 7 days after drought stress to 33 days after drought stress to evaluate different drought stress regimes based on the developmental stages of the plant. At all the tested stress levels the data points were Hierarchically grouped and clustered sets of genes were examined and an approximate number of clusters to be formed were estimated. Finding a group of genes showing a similar pattern of gene expression by means of expression data from microarray analysis is the basis for identification of genes and pathways controlling a specific trait. We have followed unsupervised classification and clustered the genes hierarchically after normalizing expression data to obtain a set of co-regulated genes. Analysis of data revealed that there are at least 3 to 4 clusters which show differential regulation under each stress regime. The annotated genes falling in these clusters interestingly include a number of novel genes from N22 library along with some known candidate genes for drought tolerance which were earlier identified in our study (Markandeya et al., 2007). Expression pattern of these genes from 7 days after drought stress to 33 days after drought stress with their fold changes were evaluated in the present study. In particular, it is observed that many genes of unknown function are also co-regulated in an interesting pattern along with known genes.
2011-11-27 | GSE31974 | GEO
Project description:We have used Agilent whole genome arrays (v4) to compare the gene expression changes between 10-day-old Arabidopsis wild type seedlings and arf2-8 (Ellis et al., 2005), gnc gnl (Richter et al., 2011) and arf2 gnc gnl mutants (all Col ecotype).
2013-07-15 | GSE35730 | GEO