Genome-wide mapping of asynchronous replication in clonal mouse cells
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus
PROVIDER: GSE130926 | GEO | 2020/11/11
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Genome-wide mapping of asynchronous replication in clonal mouse cells
| PRJNA541950 | ENA
Project description:49 human patient mRNA profiles was generated using HG-U133 Plus 2.0 microarrays. Procesed in Affymetrix Expression console using Plier normalization method and later processed in Partek Genomics Suite. The clustering figure was generated using HCE clustering software. We sought to determine the mechanisms underlying failure of muscle regeneration that is observed in dystrophic muscle through hypothesis generation using muscle profiling data (human dystrophy and murine regeneration). We found that transforming growth factor β-centered networks strongly associated with pathological fibrosis and failed regeneration were also induced during normal regeneration but at distinct time points. We hypothesized that asynchronously regenerating microenvironments are an underlying driver of fibrosis and failed regeneration. We validated this hypothesis using an experimental model of focal asynchronous bouts of muscle regeneration in wild-type (WT) mice. A chronic inflammatory state and reduced mitochondrial oxidative capacity are observed in bouts separated by 4 d, whereas a chronic profibrotic state was seen in bouts separated by 10 d. Treatment of asynchronously remodeling WT muscle with either prednisone or VBP15 mitigated the molecular phenotype. Our asynchronous regeneration model for pathological fibrosis and muscle wasting in the muscular dystrophies is likely generalizable to tissue failure in chronic inflammatory states in other regenerative tissues.
2018-01-14 | GSE109178 | GEO
Project description:We have characterized allele-specific regulation of replication in human cultured primary basophilic erythroblasts using TimEX-seq. We show that in most of the genome the timing of replication of the two chromosome homologs is robustly and tightly regulated since the two alleles replicate almost at the same time. We also show that small genetic differences such as SNPs and indels do not affect replication timing. We identify two major causes of replication asynchrony: the presence of large structural variants and parental imprinting. Both are associated with the formation of asynchronously replicated domains that can reach several megabases in size. We also report that replication timing domains have a previously undetected fine structure.
2014-05-01 | GSE50977 | GEO
Project description:Genome replication follows a defined temporal programme that can change during cellular differentiation and disease onset. DNA replication results in an increase in DNA copy number that can be measured by high-throughput sequencing (HTS). Here we present a protocol to determine genome replication dynamics using DNA copy number measurements. Cell populations can be obtained in three variants of the method. First, sort-seq uses fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) to isolate replicating and non-replicating subpopulations from asynchronous cells. Second, sync-seq uses cell synchronisation to obtain samples before and during DNA replication. Third, marker frequency analysis (MFA-seq) assesses copy number differences in rapidly replicating asynchronous cells. These approaches have been used to reveal genome replication dynamics in prokaryotes, archaea, and a wide range of eukaryotes, including mammalian cells. The whole protocol can be performed in 7-10 days.
2019-08-01 | GSE135178 | GEO
Project description:During mitosis, RNA polymerase and most transcription factors are excluded from the chromosomes and transcription ceases. The transcriptional re-activation of the genome, following mitosis, requires the re-setting of cell-type specific programs that were initially established during development. However, only about one-fifth of transcription factors are retained on chromosomes throughout mitosis and a subset of these have been shown to facilitate target gene reactivation during mitotic exit. How such “bookmarking” factors bind to chromatin in mitosis and re-activate transcription is central to the stability of transcriptional programs across multiple cell cycles. We compared a diverse set of transcription factors involved in liver differentiation and found different modes of mitotic chromosome binding. The pioneer transcription factor FoxA1, which is among the first to bind liver genes in development, exhibits virtually complete mitotic chromosome binding, whereas other liver factors bind with a range of efficiencies. Yet genome-wide analysis shows that only about 15% of the FoxA1 interphase target sites are bound in mitosis; the latter include sites at genes for maintaining cell differentiation. FoxA1 mutants that perturb specific and nonspecific DNA binding reveal a significant contribution of nonspecific binding events in mitotic chromatin. Such nonspecific binding appears to spread from interphase FoxA1 targets and may serve as storage sites. The hierarchy of specific binding, nonspecific binding, partial chromatin binding, and failure to bind mitotic chromosomes reflects the temporal sequence of the factors’ developmental roles in gene activation. Gene expression was assessed in asynchronously cycling cells in order to determine whether FoxA1 is disposed to bind to high- or low-expressed genes during mitosis. Heatmap analysis shows that FoxA1's mitotic targets are among the highest-expressed genes in asynchronous cells. Total RNA was collected from three different plates with asynchronous HUH7 cells using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen Valencia CA). Expression microarrays were performed with a Human Gene 1.OST array (Affymetrix) at the UPenn Microarray Core Facility and assessed using Partek.
2013-03-31 | E-GEOD-39208 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:In the associated paper, SERBP1 is shown to form granules in mitotic cells in a PKCɛ-dependent manner (M-bodies). We performed SERBP1 iCLIP in DLD1 cells that were either asynchronous or enriched for mitotic cells and after treatment with 2 hours of 500nM Blu577 or equivalent DMSO. We found that SERBP1 alters its positioning on rRNA in mitosis in a Blu577-dependent manner, identifying an alternative binding position that coincides with the formation of M-bodies. Mitotic enrichment was performed by single thymidine block, release in to G2 block with RO3306, and release and mitotic shake-off. The fastq files provided are demultiplexed, with adapters and barcodes trimmed and UMI sequences are found in the fastq headers.
2021-10-05 | E-MTAB-10830 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:During T cell development, multipotent progenitors relinquish competence for other fates and commit to the T cell lineage by turning on Bcl11b, which encodes a transcription factor. To clarify lineage commitment mechanisms, we followed developing T cells at the single-cell level using Bcl11b knock-in fluorescent reporter mice. Notch signaling and Notch activated transcription factors collaborate to activate Bcl11b expression irrespectively of Notch-dependent proliferation. These inputs work via three distinct, asynchronous mechanisms: an early locus âpoisingâ function dependent on TCF-1 and GATA-3, a stochastic-permissivity function dependent on Notch signaling, and a separate amplitude-control function dependent on Runx1, a factor already present in multipotent progenitors. Despite their necessity for Bcl11b activation, these inputs act in a stage specific manner, providing a multitiered mechanism for developmental gene regulation. Two sets of samples were generated from DN T-cell sub-populations derived from culture of bone marrow progenitors from mice containing a knock-in Bcl11b-YFP reporter
2016-06-27 | E-GEOD-76606 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:We have characterized allele-specific regulation of replication in human cultured primary basophilic erythroblasts using TimEX-seq. We show that in most of the genome the timing of replication of the two chromosome homologs is robustly and tightly regulated since the two alleles replicate almost at the same time. We also show that small genetic differences such as SNPs and indels do not affect replication timing. We identify two major causes of replication asynchrony: the presence of large structural variants and parental imprinting. Both are associated with the formation of asynchronously replicated domains that can reach several megabases in size. We also report that replication timing domains have a previously undetected fine structure. Compare DNA content in cells in S and G1 phase of cell cycle using TimEX-seq The goal of these experiments was to measure the timing of replication in human basophilic erythroblasts in an allele-specific manner by comparing DNA content in cells in S and G1 phase of cell cycle using TimEX-seq. Cells in S phase were obtained by sorting propidium iodide stained exponentially growing basophilic erythroblasts produce after 14 days of culture of circulating peripheral blood stem and progenitor cells. The cells in G1, which are used to normalize the results from the cells in S phase for mapability, were circulating mononuclear cells (WBCs) which are in the G1 cell for the cell cycle at 99.5%. The processed files represent S/G1 ratio values which are surrogate values for the timing of replication. Allele-specific TimEX-seq profiles and hi-resolution non-allele specific profiles are provided at different smoothing levels. The following processed files are derived from the multiple files as indicated below; >FNY01_3_2_Ery_MAT_S.bed is generated from FNY01_3_2_Ery_round *_S_Phase.bed >FNY01_3_2_Ery_PAT_S.bed is generated from FNY01_3_2_Ery_round *_S_Phase.bed >FNY01_3_2_Ery_MAT_G1.bed is generated from FNY01_3_2_WBC_round *_G1_600.bed FNY01_3_2_WBC_round *_G1_300.bed >FNY01_3_2_WBC_PAT_G1.bed is generated from FNY01_3_2_WBC_round *_G1_600.bed FNY01_3_2_WBC_round *_G1_300.bed >FNY01_3_2_Ery_S_G1 ratio_MAT_100kb_smooth.bedGraph is from FNY01_3_2_Ery_MAT_S.bed FNY01_3_2_Ery_MAT_G1.bed >FNY01_3_2_Ery_S_G1 ratio_PAT_100kb_smooth.bedGraph is from FNY01_3_2_Ery_PAT_S.bed FNY01_3_2_Ery_PAT_G1.bed >FNY01_3_2_Ery_S_G1 ratio_unsmooth.bedGraph, FNY01_3_2_Ery_S_G1 ratio_20Kb_smooth.bedGraph, and FNY01_3_2_Ery_S_G1 ratio_100Kb_smooth.bedGraph are from FNY01_3_2_Ery_round *_S_Phase.bed FNY01_3_2_WBC_round *_G1_600.bed FNY01_3_2_WBC_round *_G1_300.bed >FNY01_3_2&3_3_Ery* files are generated from 14 .bed files linked to the corresponding sample records. Please note that *3_3* files follow the same pattern as *3_2*
2014-05-01 | E-GEOD-50977 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:During T cell development, multipotent progenitors relinquish competence for other fates and commit to the T cell lineage by turning on Bcl11b, which encodes a transcription factor. To clarify lineage commitment mechanisms, we followed developing T cells at the single-cell level using Bcl11b knock-in fluorescent reporter mice. Notch signaling and Notch activated transcription factors collaborate to activate Bcl11b expression irrespectively of Notch-dependent proliferation. These inputs work via three distinct, asynchronous mechanisms: an early locus ‘poising’ function dependent on TCF-1 and GATA-3, a stochastic-permissivity function dependent on Notch signaling, and a separate amplitude-control function dependent on Runx1, a factor already present in multipotent progenitors. Despite their necessity for Bcl11b activation, these inputs act in a stage specific manner, providing a multitiered mechanism for developmental gene regulation.
2016-06-27 | GSE76606 | GEO
Project description:During mitosis, RNA polymerase and most transcription factors are excluded from the chromosomes and transcription ceases. The transcriptional re-activation of the genome, following mitosis, requires the re-setting of cell-type specific programs that were initially established during development. However, only about one-fifth of transcription factors are retained on chromosomes throughout mitosis and a subset of these have been shown to facilitate target gene reactivation during mitotic exit. How such “bookmarking” factors bind to chromatin in mitosis and re-activate transcription is central to the stability of transcriptional programs across multiple cell cycles. We compared a diverse set of transcription factors involved in liver differentiation and found different modes of mitotic chromosome binding. The pioneer transcription factor FoxA1, which is among the first to bind liver genes in development, exhibits virtually complete mitotic chromosome binding, whereas other liver factors bind with a range of efficiencies. Yet genome-wide analysis shows that only about 15% of the FoxA1 interphase target sites are bound in mitosis; the latter include sites at genes for maintaining cell differentiation. FoxA1 mutants that perturb specific and nonspecific DNA binding reveal a significant contribution of nonspecific binding events in mitotic chromatin. Such nonspecific binding appears to spread from interphase FoxA1 targets and may serve as storage sites. The hierarchy of specific binding, nonspecific binding, partial chromatin binding, and failure to bind mitotic chromosomes reflects the temporal sequence of the factors’ developmental roles in gene activation. Gene expression was assessed in asynchronously cycling cells in order to determine whether FoxA1 is disposed to bind to high- or low-expressed genes during mitosis. Heatmap analysis shows that FoxA1's mitotic targets are among the highest-expressed genes in asynchronous cells.
2013-03-31 | GSE39208 | GEO