Functional Heterogeneity of Embryonic Stem Cells Revealed Through Translational Amplification of an Early Endodermal Transcript
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Identification of transcripts in different subpopulations of the HIV mouse ES cell line growing under self-renewing conditions (+Lif, +10FCS, GMEM media and plated on gelatin coated dishes). Subpopulations were identified and isolated based on the expression of the cell surface marker, SSEA 1 (a marker of murine ES cells) and expression of the venus protein, the cDNA of which was knocked into the Hex locus (Hhex). Following growth for 24 hours after initial plating, approximately 10,000,000 cells were dissasociated from dishes with the use of Cell Dissasociating Buffer (Gibco). Cells were resuspended in FACs buffer (10%FCS in PBS) and incubated on ice. Marking of SSEA 1expression was achieved by a 10 minute incubation with a mouse monoclonal antibody to SSEA 1 (MC-480, Developmental Hybridoma Studies Bank, University of Iowa). Following several washes with FACs buffer, cells were then incubated with an Alexa-647 conjugated anti-mouse IgM anitbody (Invitrogen) for a further 10 minutes. Cells were then washed and resuspended in FACs buffer and subpopulations were fractionated by flow cytometry from two different clones of the HIV cell line (clone 5.1 and clone 16.1). The aim of this array experimnt is to identify significant differences in transcript levels of the four subpopulation from the HIV cell line. Differences of transcript levels from the subpopulations should be consistant among the biological and technical replicates for each. Keywords: transcript identification design
Project description:Quantitation of polyA mRNA levels in subpopulations of the HexVenus reporter (clone HV5.1) mouse ES cell line growing under self-renewing conditions. Subpopulations were identified and isolated based on the expression of the ES cell surface marker SSEA 1 and the expression of the venus protein. At approximately 70% confluence, cells were trypsinised, resuspended in FACs buffer (10%FCS in PBS) and incubated with a mouse monoclonal antibody to SSEA 1 (MC-480, Developmental Hybridoma Studies Bank, University of Iowa). Cells were then incubated with an Alexa-647 conjugated anti-mouse IgM antibody (Invitrogen) and subpopulations were fractionated by flow cytometry. The aim was to identify genes which are differentially expressed between FACS-sorted HV-S+ and HV+S+ primed mESC populations.
Project description:X-linked Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) for the histone modification H3K27me3 was performed on subpopulations of the HexVenus reporter mouse ES cell line (clone HV1.5) grown under self-renewing conditions. Subpopulations were identified and isolated based on the expression of the ES cell surface marker SSEA 1 and the expression of the venus protein. At approximately 70% confluence, cells were trypsinised, resuspended in FACs buffer (10%FCS in PBS) and incubated with a mouse monoclonal antibody to SSEA 1 (MC-480, Developmental Hybridoma Studies Bank, University of Iowa). Cells were then incubated with an Alexa-647 conjugated anti-mouse IgM antibody (Invitrogen) and subpopulations were fractionated by flow cytometry prior to further processing specific to each method. The aim was to determine if subtle changes in priming gene transcription were associated with changes in the magnitude of H3K27me3.
Project description:Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) for the histone modification H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 and Genome Wide Run-on seq (GROseq) were performed on subpopulations of the HexVenus reporter mouse ES cell line (clone HV1.5) growing under self-renewing conditions. Subpopulations were identified and isolated based on the expression of the ES cell surface marker SSEA 1 and the expression of the venus protein. At approximately 70% confluence, cells were trypsinised, resuspended in FACs buffer (10%FCS in PBS) and incubated with a mouse monoclonal antibody to SSEA 1 (MC-480, Developmental Hybridoma Studies Bank, University of Iowa). Cells were then incubated with an Alexa-647 conjugated anti-mouse IgM antibody (Invitrogen) and subpopulations were fractionated by flow cytometry prior to further processing specific to each method. The aim was to determine if differential gene expression between these populations is primarily mediated at the level of transcription and if these changes are concomitant with changes in chromatin state.
Project description:The cellular heterogeneity of one patient derived orthotopic breast cancer xenograft model PDX was investigated using flow cytometry, combined with assessment of in vivo tumorigenicity and SNP genotyping array for copy number analysis. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) was revealed as a highly specific cell surface marker of the human tumor cell population in both xenografts. Based on expression patterns observed in primary tumor tissue, SSEA-4 and CD24 were chosen as markers to further subdivide the luminal tumor cells into four subpopulations. FACS sorting was used to isolate four cell subpopulations. Results: In vivo tumorigenicity assay showed that SSEA-4+/CD24+ cells were non-tumorigenic, while the three other subpopulations were tumorigenic. Tumors resulting from the SSEA-4+/CD24- subpopulation of luminal cancer cells, did not express CD24, while tumors arising from the SSEA-4-/CD24-, and SSEA-4-/CD24+ populations both recapitulated the original tumor containing all four subpopulations. Copy number analysis comparing the four subpopulations between eachother, did reveal high similarity. Although there were some minor differencies between the subpopulations, no differences in genome aberrations could explain their difference in tumorigenicity. Discussion: Our results imply that subpopulations from one primary tumor can give rise to dissimilar daughter tumors. These tumors may not necessarily respond to the same targeted treatment, and thereby represent a therapy escape mechanism. This study highlights that to remove the risk of breast cancer recurrence, inhibition of the molecules critical for driving the tumor progression in several tumor cell subpopulations might be essential
Project description:We modeled two types of breastfeeding behaviors in wild type FVB/N mice: (1) normal or gradual involution of breast tissue following prolonged breastfeeding and (2) forced or abrupt involution following short-term breastfeeding. To accomplish this, pups were gradually weaned between 28 and 31 days (gradual involution) or abruptly at 7 days postpartum (abrupt involution). FACS was used to relatively quantify mammary epithelial subpopulations. Gene set enrichment analysis was used to analyze gene expression data from mouse mammary luminal progenitor cells. Briefly, single cell suspension of the mammary glands was enriched for lineage-negative (Lin−) epithelial cells excluding the Lin+ cells, specifically hematopoietic (biotinylated CD45 and TER119), endothelial (biotinylated CD31), and immune (biotinylated BP-1) cells. The negatively selected cell population was enriched for luminal epithelium (LE) and mammary stem cell (MaSC)-enriched/basal epithelium (MaSC-enriched). For FACS analysis, Lin− populations were labeled with CD24-PE, CD29-FITC, and CD61-APC while their respective isotypes were used as negative controls. Cell suspensions were incubated with the appropriate antibodies for 30 min on ice. Cells were resuspended in FACS buffer (1 mM EDTA, 1% HI-FBS, and 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.0 in 1× phosphate-buffered saline) and sorted on a FACS BD LSR II Flow Cytometer.
Project description:The cellular heterogeneity of one patient derived orthotopic breast cancer xenograft model PDX was investigated using flow cytometry, combined with assessment of in vivo tumorigenicity and SNP genotyping array for copy number analysis. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) was revealed as a highly specific cell surface marker of the human tumor cell population in both xenografts. Based on expression patterns observed in primary tumor tissue, SSEA-4 and CD24 were chosen as markers to further subdivide the luminal tumor cells into four subpopulations. FACS sorting was used to isolate four cell subpopulations. Results: In vivo tumorigenicity assay showed that SSEA-4+/CD24+ cells were non-tumorigenic, while the three other subpopulations were tumorigenic. Tumors resulting from the SSEA-4+/CD24- subpopulation of luminal cancer cells, did not express CD24, while tumors arising from the SSEA-4-/CD24-, and SSEA-4-/CD24+ populations both recapitulated the original tumor containing all four subpopulations. Copy number analysis comparing the four subpopulations between eachother, did reveal high similarity. Although there were some minor differencies between the subpopulations, no differences in genome aberrations could explain their difference in tumorigenicity. Discussion: Our results imply that subpopulations from one primary tumor can give rise to dissimilar daughter tumors. These tumors may not necessarily respond to the same targeted treatment, and thereby represent a therapy escape mechanism. This study highlights that to remove the risk of breast cancer recurrence, inhibition of the molecules critical for driving the tumor progression in several tumor cell subpopulations might be essential Four subpopulations were analysed using Infinium HumanOmniExpressExome BeadChip array. Replicates are not included, the HumanOmniExpressExome-8v1-2_A.egt file was used as a reference.
Project description:The cellular heterogeneity of one patient derived orthotopic breast cancer xenograft model (PDBCX) was investigated using flow cytometry , combined with assessment of in vivo tumorigenicity and whole genome expression profiling. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) was revealed as a highly specific cell surface marker of the human tumor cell population in both xenografts. Based on expression patterns observed in primary tumor tissue, SSEA-4 and CD24 were chosen as markers to further subdivide the luminal tumor cells into four subpopulations. FACS sorting was used to isolate four cell subpopulations. Results: In vivo tumorigenicity assay showed that SSEA-4+/CD24+ cells were non-tumorigenic, while the three other subpopulations were tumorigenic. Tumors resulting from the SSEA-4+/CD24- subpopulation of luminal cancer cells, did not express CD24, while tumors arising from the SSEA-4-/CD24-, and SSEA-4-/CD24+ populations both recapitulated the original tumor containing all four subpopulations. Whole genome expression analysis revealed distinct transcriptional profiles, and 44 genes were significantly differentially expressed when comparing the tumorigenic vs non-tumorigenic populations. Several interesting genes putatively suppressing the cancer cells ability to initiate tumors in vivo were upregulated in the non-tumorigenic population. We here show that tumor initiating cells within one primary tumor evidently included more than one phenotype. Furthermore, with respect to cell surface marker expression, one of the subpopulations produced tumors unlike both the originating cells, and the original tumor. Discussion: Our results imply that subpopulations from one primary tumor can give rise to dissimilar daughter tumors. These tumors may not necessarily respond to the same targeted treatment, and thereby represent a therapy escape mechanism. This study highlights that to remove the risk of breast cancer recurrence, inhibition of the molecules critical for driving the tumor progression in several tumor cell subpopulations might be essential
Project description:The cellular heterogeneity of one patient derived orthotopic breast cancer xenograft model (PDBCX) was investigated using flow cytometry , combined with assessment of in vivo tumorigenicity and whole genome expression profiling. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) was revealed as a highly specific cell surface marker of the human tumor cell population in both xenografts. Based on expression patterns observed in primary tumor tissue, SSEA-4 and CD24 were chosen as markers to further subdivide the luminal tumor cells into four subpopulations. FACS sorting was used to isolate four cell subpopulations. Results: In vivo tumorigenicity assay showed that SSEA-4+/CD24+ cells were non-tumorigenic, while the three other subpopulations were tumorigenic. Tumors resulting from the SSEA-4+/CD24- subpopulation of luminal cancer cells, did not express CD24, while tumors arising from the SSEA-4-/CD24-, and SSEA-4-/CD24+ populations both recapitulated the original tumor containing all four subpopulations. Whole genome expression analysis revealed distinct transcriptional profiles, and 44 genes were significantly differentially expressed when comparing the tumorigenic vs non-tumorigenic populations. Several interesting genes putatively suppressing the cancer cells ability to initiate tumors in vivo were upregulated in the non-tumorigenic population. We here show that tumor initiating cells within one primary tumor evidently included more than one phenotype. Furthermore, with respect to cell surface marker expression, one of the subpopulations produced tumors unlike both the originating cells, and the original tumor. Discussion: Our results imply that subpopulations from one primary tumor can give rise to dissimilar daughter tumors. These tumors may not necessarily respond to the same targeted treatment, and thereby represent a therapy escape mechanism. This study highlights that to remove the risk of breast cancer recurrence, inhibition of the molecules critical for driving the tumor progression in several tumor cell subpopulations might be essential Gene expression was measured in four cell subpopulations isolated from Patient derived human luminal-like breast cancer xenograft. Four replicates from three subpopulations and three replicates from one subpopulation.
Project description:gDNA was estracted and digested with cocktail of restrict enzymes MseI, DdeI, AluI, MboI, incubated at 37°C for 6 h. After purified by phenol/chloroform extraction, fragmented DNA was resuspended by TE, and quantified by Qubit 3.0 (Invitrogen). For each sample, 20 μg input DNA was immunoprecipitated overnight at 4°C in a shaker, with 1× DRIP binding buffer (10 mM NaPO4 pH 7.0, 140 mM NaCl, 0.05% Triton X-100) and 10 μg S9.6 antibody (ATCC, HB-8730). After adding 50 μl Dynabeads Protein G (Invitrogen, 10004D) and incubated for 4 h, the beads with antibody were washed by 1× DRIP binding buffer for 4 times at room temperature, each wash takes 10 min. Added 250 μl elution buffer (50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 10 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS) and 5 U Proteinase K to beads/antibody complexes, incubated for 40 min in an Eppendorf ThermoMixer at 55°C, 1,000 rpm. Purified by phenol/chloroform extraction, and moved supernatant to a new tube, followed by adding 1/10 volume 3 M NaAc, 1 μl GlycoBlue (Invitrogen) and 1 volume isopropanol, precipitated at -20°C for 3 h and then centrifuged. After washed by 70% ethanol and dried, the DRIPed DNA pellet was resuspended by 75 μl low EDTA TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl 8.0, 0.1 mM EDTA). NGS libraries were constructed using Accel-NGS® 1S Plus DNA Library Kit (Swift Biosciences).
Project description:The experiment was designed to obtain a broader unbiased view of the changes in islet macrophages following low dose STZ challenge. Mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). 16-20-week-old C57BL/6J males were given 30 mg/kg STZ or acetate buffer (control) i.p. (intraperitoneal injection) for 5 consecutive days. Following the first STZ or buffer injection mice were sacrificed on day 14 and islets were isolated by collagenase digestion. Freshly isolated islets were dispersed in 0.02% Trypsin-EDTA for 3 minutes followed by up to 1 minute of pipetting under a stereomicroscope to obtain a single cell solution. Islet media was added to stop the reaction. Islets from 10 mice were pooled per sample (N). Dispersed islets were washed with FACS buffer (1% heat inactivated FBS, 1 mM EDTA, 11 mM glucose in PBS). Cells were kept on ice and pre-incubated with Fc Block (1:100) for 5 minutes, followed by 30 min incubation with CD45-eFluor 450 (1:250; clone 30-F11), Ly-6C-APC (1:1,200; clone HK1.4), CD11b-PE (1:1,200; clone M1/700, F4/80-FITC (1:150; clone BM8), CD11c-PECy7 (1:150; clone N418), and the viability dye 7AAD (1:2,000). Unstained, single stains, and fluorescence minus one controls were used for setting gates and compensation. Viable, single CD45+Ly6c-Cd11b+Cd11c+F4/80+ cells were sorted using a BD FACS Aria IIu directly into lysis buffer, and the RNeasy Plus Micro Kit from Qiagen was used to isolate total RNA. Total RNA quality control quantification was performed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. All RNA samples had an RNA integrity number (RIN) ≥9.1. The NeoPrep Library Prep System from Ilumina was used for library preparation followed by sequencing using standard Illumina methods and Ilumina NextSeq500.