YAP and TAZ Dictate Binary Pan-Cancer Superclasses
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below. We defined pan-cancer binary classes based on distinct expression of YAP (and its paralog TAZ/ WWTR1) and YAP-responsive adhesion regulators. Combining informatics with in vivo and in vitro gain- and loss-of-function studies across multiple murine and human tumor types, we showed that opposite pro- or anti-cancer YAP activity functionally defines binary YAPon or YAPoff cancer classes that express or silence YAP, respectively. Essentially all leukemia and lymphoma fall into the YAPoff class, as do multiple neural and neuroendocrine YAPoff solid cancers. YAPoff solid cancers are frequently RB1-/-, such as retinoblastoma, small cell lung cancer and neuroendocrine prostate cancer. YAP-silencing was intrinsic to the cell-of-origin, or acquired with lineage-switching and drug-resistance. The binary cancer groups exhibit distinct YAP-dependent adhesive behavior, and pharmaceutical vulnerabilities, underscoring clinical relevance. Mechanistically, whereas YAP induces cell cycle genes in YAPon cancers, extensive RNAseq data showed that forced YAP expression in YAPoff cancers instead activated adhesion genes that are normally co-silenced with YAP. YAP regulates both of these anti-cancer adhesive or pro-cancer cell cycle programs through the TEAD DNA binding family (TEAD1-4). YAP/TEAD targets AP1-bound enhancers in YAPon cancers, but Chipseq studies revealed that in YAPoff cancers, YAP/TEAD instead targeted elements co-bound with neural and neuroendocrine lineage-defining basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) and Homeobox transcription factors (e.g. NEUROD, ASCL1, NKX2, OTX2). A CRISPR screen revealed that, among the adhesion regulators, ITGAV/ITGB5 pair are required for YAP induced cytostasis in YAPoff cancers. YAP is thus pivotal across all cancer, but in opposite pro- or anti-cancer ways, which define contrasting genetic and drug sensitivities.
Project description:We defined pan-cancer binary classes based on distinct expression of YAP (and its paralog TAZ/ WWTR1) and YAP-responsive adhesion regulators. Combining informatics with in vivo and in vitro gain- and loss-of-function studies across multiple murine and human tumor types, we showed that opposite pro- or anti-cancer YAP activity functionally defines binary YAPon or YAPoff cancer classes that express or silence YAP, respectively. Essentially all leukemia and lymphoma fall into the YAPoff class, as do multiple neural and neuroendocrine YAPoff solid cancers. YAPoff solid cancers are frequently RB1-/-, such as retinoblastoma, small cell lung cancer and neuroendocrine prostate cancer. YAP-silencing was intrinsic to the cell-of-origin, or acquired with lineage-switching and drug-resistance. The binary cancer groups exhibit distinct YAP-dependent adhesive behavior, and pharmaceutical vulnerabilities, underscoring clinical relevance. Mechanistically, whereas YAP induces cell cycle genes in YAPon cancers, extensive RNAseq data showed that forced YAP expression in YAPoff cancers instead activated adhesion genes that are normally co-silenced with YAP. YAP regulates both of these anti-cancer adhesive or pro-cancer cell cycle programs through the TEAD DNA binding family (TEAD1-4). YAP/TEAD targets AP1-bound enhancers in YAPon cancers, but Chipseq studies revealed that in YAPoff cancers, YAP/TEAD instead targeted elements co-bound with neural and neuroendocrine lineage-defining basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) and Homeobox transcription factors (e.g. NEUROD, ASCL1, NKX2, OTX2). A CRISPR screen revealed that, among the adhesion regulators, ITGAV/ITGB5 pair are required for YAP induced cytostasis in YAPoff cancers. YAP is thus pivotal across all cancer, but in opposite pro- or anti-cancer ways, which define contrasting genetic and drug sensitivities.
Project description:We defined pan-cancer binary classes based on distinct expression of YAP (and its paralog TAZ/ WWTR1) and YAP-responsive adhesion regulators. Combining informatics with in vivo and in vitro gain- and loss-of-function studies across multiple murine and human tumor types, we showed that opposite pro- or anti-cancer YAP activity functionally defines binary YAPon or YAPoff cancer classes that express or silence YAP, respectively. Essentially all leukemia and lymphoma fall into the YAPoff class, as do multiple neural and neuroendocrine YAPoff solid cancers. YAPoff solid cancers are frequently RB1-/-, such as retinoblastoma, small cell lung cancer and neuroendocrine prostate cancer. YAP-silencing was intrinsic to the cell-of-origin, or acquired with lineage-switching and drug-resistance. The binary cancer groups exhibit distinct YAP-dependent adhesive behavior, and pharmaceutical vulnerabilities, underscoring clinical relevance. Mechanistically, whereas YAP induces cell cycle genes in YAPon cancers, extensive RNAseq data showed that forced YAP expression in YAPoff cancers instead activated adhesion genes that are normally co-silenced with YAP. YAP regulates both of these anti-cancer adhesive or pro-cancer cell cycle programs through the TEAD DNA binding family (TEAD1-4). YAP/TEAD targets AP1-bound enhancers in YAPon cancers, but Chipseq studies revealed that in YAPoff cancers, YAP/TEAD instead targeted elements co-bound with neural and neuroendocrine lineage-defining basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) and Homeobox transcription factors (e.g. NEUROD, ASCL1, NKX2, OTX2). A CRISPR screen revealed that, among the adhesion regulators, ITGAV/ITGB5 pair are required for YAP induced cytostasis in YAPoff cancers. YAP is thus pivotal across all cancer, but in opposite pro- or anti-cancer ways, which define contrasting genetic and drug sensitivities.
Project description:Uncontrolled Transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ) signaling promotes aggressive metastatic properties in late-stage breast cancers. However, how TGFβ-mediated cues are directed to induce late-stage tumorigenic events is poorly understood, particularly given that TGFβ has clear tumor suppressing activity in other contexts. Here we demonstrate that the transcriptional regulators TAZ and YAP (TAZ/YAP), key effectors of the Hippo pathway, are necessary to promote and maintain TGFβ-induced tumorigenic phenotypes in breast cancer cells. Interactions between TAZ/YAP, TGFβ-activated SMAD2/3, and TEAD transcription factors reveal convergent roles for these factors in the nucleus. Genome-wide expression analyses indicate that TAZ/YAP, TEADs and TGFβ-induced signals coordinate a specific pro-tumorigenic transcriptional program. Importantly, genes cooperatively regulated by TAZ/YAP, TEAD, and TGFβ, such as the novel targets NEGR1 and UCA1, are necessary for maintaining tumorigenic activity in metastatic breast cancer cells. Nuclear TAZ/YAP also cooperate with TGFβ signaling to promote phenotypic and transcriptional changes in non-tumorigenic cells to overcome TGFβ repressive effects. Our work thus identifies crosstalk between nuclear TAZ/YAP and TGFβ signaling in breast cancer cells, revealing novel insight into late-stage disease-driving mechanisms. Expression profiling was conducted following the repression of the transcriptional regulators TAZ and YAP (TAZ/YAP), the TEAD family of transcription factors (TEAD1/2/3/4), or the TGFb signaling pathway (with SB-431542, an inhibitor of the TBRI recpeptor) in human MDA-MB-231-LM2 breast cancer cells treated with TGFβ1. Human MDA-MB-231-LM2-4 breast cancer cells were transfected with control siRNA, or siRNAs targeting TAZ/YAP or all four TEADs and were treated 24 hours later with 500pM TGFβ1 or 5mM SB-431542 for an additional 24 hours. Total RNA was isolated and twelve microarrays in total were performed, with each condition carried out three times on separate days. The Boston University Microarray Core generated the data using the Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0 St Array.
Project description:The Hippo tumour suppressor pathway controls transcription by regulating nuclear abundance of YAP and TAZ, which activate transcription with the TEAD1-TEAD4 DNA-binding proteins. Recently, several small-molecule inhibitors of YAP and TEADs have been reported, with some now entering clinical trials for different cancers. Here, we investigated the cellular response to TEAD palmitoylation inhibitors, using genomic and genetic strategies. Genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screens revealed that mutations in genes from the Hippo, MAPK and JAK-STAT signaling pathways all modulate the cellular response to TEAD inhibition. Inhibition of TEAD palmitoylation strongly reduced YAP/TEAD target expression, whilst only mildly impacting YAP/TEAD genome binding. Additionally, expression of MAPK pathway genes was induced upon inhibition of TEAD palmitoylation, which coincided with YAP/TEAD redistribution to AP-1 transcription factor binding sites. Consistent with this, combined inhibition of TEAD and the MAPK protein MEK, synergistically blocked proliferation of several mesothelioma and lung cancer cell lines and more potently reduced the growth of patient-derived lung cancers in vivo. Collectively, we reveal mechanisms by which cells can overcome small-molecule inhibition of TEAD palmitoylation and potential strategies to enhance the anti-tumor activity of emerging Hippo pathway targeted therapies.
Project description:Uncontrolled Transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ) signaling promotes aggressive metastatic properties in late-stage breast cancers. However, how TGFβ-mediated cues are directed to induce late-stage tumorigenic events is poorly understood, particularly given that TGFβ has clear tumor suppressing activity in other contexts. Here we demonstrate that the transcriptional regulators TAZ and YAP (TAZ/YAP), key effectors of the Hippo pathway, are necessary to promote and maintain TGFβ-induced tumorigenic phenotypes in breast cancer cells. Interactions between TAZ/YAP, TGFβ-activated SMAD2/3, and TEAD transcription factors reveal convergent roles for these factors in the nucleus. Genome-wide expression analyses indicate that TAZ/YAP, TEADs and TGFβ-induced signals coordinate a specific pro-tumorigenic transcriptional program. Importantly, genes cooperatively regulated by TAZ/YAP, TEAD, and TGFβ, such as the novel targets NEGR1 and UCA1, are necessary for maintaining tumorigenic activity in metastatic breast cancer cells. Nuclear TAZ/YAP also cooperate with TGFβ signaling to promote phenotypic and transcriptional changes in non-tumorigenic cells to overcome TGFβ repressive effects. Our work thus identifies crosstalk between nuclear TAZ/YAP and TGFβ signaling in breast cancer cells, revealing novel insight into late-stage disease-driving mechanisms. Expression profiling was conducted following the repression of the transcriptional regulators TAZ and YAP (TAZ/YAP), the TEAD family of transcription factors (TEAD1/2/3/4), or the TGFb signaling pathway (with SB-431542, an inhibitor of the TBRI recpeptor) in human MDA-MB-231-LM2 breast cancer cells treated with TGFβ1.
Project description:Regulation of organ size is important for development and tissue homeostasis. In Drosophila, Hippo signaling controls organ size by regulating the activity of a TEAD transcription factor, Scalloped, through modulation of its coactivator protein Yki. The role of mammalian Tead proteins in growth regulation, however, remains unknown. Here we examined the role of mouse Tead proteins in growth regulation. In NIH3T3 cells, cell density and Hippo signaling regulated the activity of Tead proteins by modulating nuclear localization of a Yki homologue, Yap, and the resulting change in Tead activity altered cell proliferation. Tead2-VP16 mimicked Yap overexpression, including increased cell proliferation, reduced cell death, promotion of EMT, lack of cell contact inhibition, and promotion of tumor formation. Growth promoting activities of various Yap mutants correlated with their Tead-coactivator activities. Tead2-VP16 and Yap regulated largely overlapping sets of genes. However, only a few of the Tead/Yapregulated genes in NIH3T3 cells were affected in Tead1-/-;Tead2-/- or Yap-/- embryos. Most of the previously identified Yap-regulated genes were not affected in NIH3T3 cells or mutant mice. In embryos, levels of nuclear Yap and Tead1 varied depending on cell types. Strong nuclear accumulation of Yap and Tead1 were seen in myocardium, correlating with requirements of Tead1 for proliferation. However, their distribution did not always correlate with proliferation. Taken together, mammalian Tead proteins regulate cell proliferation and contact inhibition as a transcriptional mediator of Hippo signaling, but the mechanisms by which Tead/Yap regulate cell proliferation differ depending on cell types, and Tead, Yap and Hippo signaling may play multiple roles in mouse embryos. We used microarrays to know the gene expression profiles regurated by Tead2-VP16, Tead2-EnR, Yap, and cell density in NIH3T3 cells. Keywords: Cell density, genetic modification Tead2-VP16-, Tead2-EnR-, Yap- and control vector-expressing cells were cultured at low or high density for RNA extraction and hybridization on Affymetrix microarrays.
Project description:TEAD transcription factors (TEAD1-4) serve as the primary effectors of the Hippo signaling pathway in various cancers. There has been significant progress in the development of therapeutic strategies aimed at disrupting the interaction of TEAD with its coactivators YAP/TAZ. However, targeted therapy leads to the emergence of resistance which poses a barrier to achieving complete cures. Currently, the underlying mechanism of resistance to TEAD inhibition in cancers remains unexplored. We uncover that upregulation of the AP-1 transcription factors, along with restored YAP/TEAD activity, drives resistance to GNE-7883, a pan-TEAD and allosteric TEAD inhibitor. Acute GNE-7883 treatment abrogates YAP binding and attenuates FOSL1 activity but compensation by increased MAPK pathway activity remains insufficient for cell survival. In contrast, TEAD inhibitor resistant cells are able to restore YAP and TEAD occupancy and acquire additional FOSL1 binding sites, leading to increased chromatin accessibility at AP-1 motifs. Resistant cells undergo transcriptional reprogramming to acquire a mesenchymal-like cell state and sustained MAPK activity. We uncover a dependence on the MAPK pathway in the TEAD inhibitor resistant cells, further highlighting the key role of MAPK pathway inhibitors, such as Cobimetinib and Belvarafenib to mitigate resistance mechanisms to TEAD inhibition in Hippo pathway dependent cancers. This study describes a clinically relevant interplay between the Hippo and MAPK pathway in cancers and offers a promising avenue to address TEAD inhibitor resistance in the clinic.
Project description:TEAD transcription factors (TEAD1-4) serve as the primary effectors of the Hippo signaling pathway in various cancers. There has been significant progress in the development of therapeutic strategies aimed at disrupting the interaction of TEAD with its coactivators YAP/TAZ. However, targeted therapy leads to the emergence of resistance which poses a barrier to achieving complete cures. Currently, the underlying mechanism of resistance to TEAD inhibition in cancers remains unexplored. We uncover that upregulation of the AP-1 transcription factors, along with restored YAP/TEAD activity, drives resistance to GNE-7883, a pan-TEAD and allosteric TEAD inhibitor. Acute GNE-7883 treatment abrogates YAP binding and attenuates FOSL1 activity but compensation by increased MAPK pathway activity remains insufficient for cell survival. In contrast, TEAD inhibitor resistant cells are able to restore YAP and TEAD occupancy and acquire additional FOSL1 binding sites, leading to increased chromatin accessibility at AP-1 motifs. Resistant cells undergo transcriptional reprogramming to acquire a mesenchymal-like cell state and sustained MAPK activity. We uncover a dependence on the MAPK pathway in the TEAD inhibitor resistant cells, further highlighting the key role of MAPK pathway inhibitors, such as Cobimetinib and Belvarafenib to mitigate resistance mechanisms to TEAD inhibition in Hippo pathway dependent cancers. This study describes a clinically relevant interplay between the Hippo and MAPK pathway in cancers and offers a promising avenue to address TEAD inhibitor resistance in the clinic.
Project description:TEAD transcription factors (TEAD1-4) serve as the primary effectors of the Hippo signaling pathway in various cancers. There has been significant progress in the development of therapeutic strategies aimed at disrupting the interaction of TEAD with its coactivators YAP/TAZ. However, targeted therapy leads to the emergence of resistance which poses a barrier to achieving complete cures. Currently, the underlying mechanism of resistance to TEAD inhibition in cancers remains unexplored. We uncover that upregulation of the AP-1 transcription factors, along with restored YAP/TEAD activity, drives resistance to GNE-7883, a pan-TEAD and allosteric TEAD inhibitor. Acute GNE-7883 treatment abrogates YAP binding and attenuates FOSL1 activity but compensation by increased MAPK pathway activity remains insufficient for cell survival. In contrast, TEAD inhibitor resistant cells are able to restore YAP and TEAD occupancy and acquire additional FOSL1 binding sites, leading to increased chromatin accessibility at AP-1 motifs. Resistant cells undergo transcriptional reprogramming to acquire a mesenchymal-like cell state and sustained MAPK activity. We uncover a dependence on the MAPK pathway in the TEAD inhibitor resistant cells, further highlighting the key role of MAPK pathway inhibitors, such as Cobimetinib and Belvarafenib to mitigate resistance mechanisms to TEAD inhibition in Hippo pathway dependent cancers. This study describes a clinically relevant interplay between the Hippo and MAPK pathway in cancers and offers a promising avenue to address TEAD inhibitor resistance in the clinic.
Project description:TEAD transcription factors (TEAD1-4) serve as the primary effectors of the Hippo signaling pathway in various cancers. There has been significant progress in the development of therapeutic strategies aimed at disrupting the interaction of TEAD with its coactivators YAP/TAZ. However, targeted therapy leads to the emergence of resistance which poses a barrier to achieving complete cures. Currently, the underlying mechanism of resistance to TEAD inhibition in cancers remains unexplored. We uncover that upregulation of the AP-1 transcription factors, along with restored YAP/TEAD activity, drives resistance to GNE-7883, a pan-TEAD and allosteric TEAD inhibitor. Acute GNE-7883 treatment abrogates YAP binding and attenuates FOSL1 activity but compensation by increased MAPK pathway activity remains insufficient for cell survival. In contrast, TEAD inhibitor resistant cells are able to restore YAP and TEAD occupancy and acquire additional FOSL1 binding sites, leading to increased chromatin accessibility at AP-1 motifs. Resistant cells undergo transcriptional reprogramming to acquire a mesenchymal-like cell state and sustained MAPK activity. We uncover a dependence on the MAPK pathway in the TEAD inhibitor resistant cells, further highlighting the key role of MAPK pathway inhibitors, such as Cobimetinib and Belvarafenib to mitigate resistance mechanisms to TEAD inhibition in Hippo pathway dependent cancers. This study describes a clinically relevant interplay between the Hippo and MAPK pathway in cancers and offers a promising avenue to address TEAD inhibitor resistance in the clinic.