Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

A modified protocol of Capture-C allows affordable and flexible high-resolution promoter interactome analysis

ABSTRACT: Large-scale epigenomic projects have mapped hundreds of thousands of potential regulatory sites in the human genome, but only a small proportion of these elements are proximal to transcription start sites. It is believed that the majority of these sequences are remote promoter-activating genomic sites scattered within several hundreds of kilobases from their cognate promoters and referred to as enhancers. It is still unclear what principles, aside from relative closeness in the linear genome, determine which promoter(s) is controlled by a given enhancer; however, this understanding is of great fundamental and clinical relevance. In recent years, C-methods have become a powerful tool for the identification of enhancer-promoter spatial contacts that, in most cases, reflect their functional link. Here, we present data on spatial interactions of 867 promoters in HeLa cells. This data is obtained with a new hybridization-based promoter Capture-C protocol that makes use of biotinylated dsDNA probes and allows high-resolution promoter interactome description.

ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens

PROVIDER: GSE150048 | GEO | 2020/05/08

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Nonlinear control of transcription through promoter-enhancer interactions [RNA-seq]

Project description:Chromosome structure in mammals is thought to regulate transcription by modulating spatial proximity between enhancers and promoters. However, the mechanisms by which this occurs remain elusive, and reports suggested moderate to no correlation between physical proximity and transcription. Whether and how chromosome structure is actually translated into transcriptional outputs thus remains unclear. Here we use a novel assay to position an enhancer at hundreds of different chromosomal sites relative to a fixed promoter and quantitatively measure promoter output.

2021-11-05 | GSE188266 | GEO

Nonlinear control of transcription through promoter-enhancer interactions [splinkerette PCR]

2021-04-26 | GSE172256 | GEO

Nonlinear control of transcription through promoter-enhancer interactions [cHi-C]

2021-04-26 | GSE172255 | GEO

Nonlinear control of transcription through promoter-enhancer interactions [Nanopore]

2021-04-26 | GSE172253 | GEO

ChIP-seq data of Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigen Leader ProteinM-BM- (EBNALP)

Project description:Epstein-Barr-Virus (EBV) Nuclear Antigens EBNALP and EBNA2 are co-expressed in EBV infected B-lymphocytes and are critical for Lymphoblastoid Cell Line (LCL) growth. EBNALP removes NCOR1 and RBPJ repressive complexes from promoter and enhancer sites and EBNA2 mostly activates transcription from distal enhancers. ChIP-seqs found EBNALP at 19,224 LCL sites, which were 33% promoter associated. EBNALP was associated with 10 transcription factor (TF) clusters that included YY1(63%), SP1(62%), PAX5(59%), BATF(50%), IRF4(49%), RBPJ(43%), ETS1(39%), PU.1(37%), RAD21(33%), NF-kB(31%), TBLR1(26%), ZNF143(24%), CTCF(23%), SMC3(21%), and EBF(17%). EBNALP sites had higher H3K4me3, H3K9ac, H3K27ac, H2Az, and RNA Pol II signals than EBNA2 sites and had similar transcription effects. EBNALP co-localized with 29% of 19,845 EBNA2 sites. EBNALP/EBNA2 sites were similar to EBNALP sites in promoter localization, associated cell TFs, Pol II, H3K4me3, H3K9ac, H3K27ac, and H2Az signals. EBNALP and EBNA2 promoter sites were more transcriptionally active than EBNALP or EBNA2 promoter sites. EBNALP was at the enhancer or promoter of myc and MYC affected genes, including cyclin D2, and bcl2. EBNALP at promoters with DNA looping and transcription factors, is positioned to deplete repressors from enhancers and promoters, enable chromatin remodeling, and transcription activation. Two EBNALP ChIP-seq replicates from IB4 LCL are analyzed in this study.

2013-07-31 | E-GEOD-49338 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Clustering of CpG islands constitutes an important determinant of the interphase chromosome 3D organization [ChIP-Seq]

Project description:Using 4C-Seq experimental procedure we have characterized, in cultured chicken lymphoid and erythroid cells, genome-wide patterns of spatial contacts of several CpG islands scattered along the chromosome 14. A clear tendency for interaction of CpG islands present within the same and different chromosomes has been observed. Accordingly, preferential spatial contacts between Sp1 binding motifs, and other GC-rich genomic elements including DNA sequence motifs capable to form G-quadruplexes were demonstrated. On the other hand, an anchor placed in gene/CpG islands-poor area was found to form spatial contacts with other gene/CpG islands-poor areas within chromosome 14 and other chromosomes. These results corroborate the two compartments model of interphase chromosome spatial organization and suggest that clustering of CpG islands harboring promoters and origins of DNA replication constitutes an important determinant of the 3D organization of eukaryotic genome in the cell nucleus. Using ChIP-Seq experimental procedure we have mapped genome-wide the CTCF deposition sites in chicken lymphoid and erythroid cells subjected to the 4C analysis. A good correlation between the density of these sites and the level of 4C signals was observed for the anchors located in CpG islands. It is thus possible that CTCF contributes to the clustering of CpG islands revealed in our experiments. Using ChIP-Seq experimental procedure we have mapped genome-wide the CTCF deposition sites in chicken lymphoid and erythroid cells subjected to the 4C analysis. CTCF deposition sites in chicken lymphoid and erythroid (induced and non-induced) cells.

2014-03-01 | E-GEOD-51846 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Sequencing of Coding and Non-coding Regions in Primary Breast Cancers and Patient-matched Controls

Project description:<p>Genomic analysis of tumor samples has led to the identification of hundreds of cancer genes based on the presence of mutations in protein-coding regions. By contrast, much less is known about cancer-causing mutations in non-coding regions. Here, we performed deep sequencing in 360 primary breast cancers and developed computational methods to identify significantly mutated promoters. Clear signals were found in the promoters of four genes. FOXA1, a known driver of hormone-receptor positive breast cancer, harbors a mutational hotspot in its promoter that leads to overexpression through increased E2F binding. RMRP and NEAT1, two non-coding RNA genes, carry mutations that alter protein binding to the promoter and impact expression levels. Overall, our study shows that recurrent mutations in or near gene promoters in cancers have functional consequences. Power analyses indicate that more such genes remain to be discovered through deep sequencing of adequately sized patient cohorts. </p>

| phs001250 | dbGaP

High Resolution Analysis of Spatial Interactions of Hundreds of Promoters in HeLa Cells

Project description:High Resolution Analysis of Spatial Interactions of Hundreds of Promoters in HeLa Cells

| PRJNA625799 | ENA

Nuclear SLIC-CAGE of human cortical neurons from Cornelia de Lange Syndrome patients and control individuals

Project description:We used SLIC-CAGE to map transcriptional start sites in cortical neurons from Cornelia de Lange Syndrome (CdLS) patients and control individuals. SLIC-CAGE was performed using nuclear RNA isolated from pre-frontal cortical grey matter. Usage of nuclear RNA allows enrichment of unstable RNAs, such as RNA originating from enhancer transcription. We characterised promoter-level gene expression in cortical neurons from CdLS patients and found deregulation of hundreds of genes enriched for neuronal functions.

2021-02-27 | E-MTAB-9045 | biostudies-arrayexpress

The genomic landscape of cohesin-associated chromatin interactions

Project description:Cohesin is implicated in establishing tissue-specific DNA loops that target enhancers to promoters, and also localizes to sites bound by the insulator protein CTCF, which blocks enhancer-promoter communication. However, cohesin-associated interactions have not been characterized on a genome-wide scale. Here we performed chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tag sequencing (ChIA-PET) of the cohesin subunit SMC1A in developing mouse limb. We identified 2,264 SMC1A interactions, of which 1,491 (65%) involved sites co-occupied by CTCF. SMC1A participates in tissue- specific enhancer-promoter interactions and interactions that demarcate regions of correlated regulatory output. In contrast to previous studies, we also identified interactions between promoters and distal sites that are maintained in multiple tissues, but are poised in embryonic stem cells and resolve to tissue-specific activated or repressed chromatin states in the mouse embryo. Our results reveal the diversity of cohesin- associated interactions in the genome and highlight their role in establishing the regulatory architecture of development. Smc1a ChIA-PET, RNA-seq, chromatin state maps (H3K27ac, H3K27me3, H3K4m2), and CTCF and Smc1a binding in mouse embryonic limb bud (E11.5)

2013-05-22 | E-GEOD-42237 | biostudies-arrayexpress

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data