RNA-seq expression profiling of stromal and epithelial cell subpopulations from human breast tissue
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE161892 | GEO | 2021/03/19
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:To further characterize the molecular and biological features of the Sca-1+ luminal cells, we performed an RNA-seq analysis using FACS-isolated distinct cell lineages in adult mouse prostates, including the Lin-CD24lowCD49fhigh basal cells, Lin-CD24-CD49f- stromal cells, Lin-CD24highCD49flowSca-1- luminal cells, and Lin-CD24highCD49flowSca-1+ luminal cells.
2023-01-06 | GSE144602 | GEO
Project description:Breast cancer is the most common cancer in females, affecting one in every eight women and accounting for the majority of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. Germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are significant risk factors for specific subtypes of breast cancer. BRCA1 mutations are associated with basal-like breast cancers, whereas BRCA2 mutations are associated with luminal-like disease. Defects in mammary epithelial cell differentiation have been previously recognized in germline BRCA1/2 mutation carriers even before cancer incidence. However, the underlying mechanism is largely unknown. Here, we employ spatial transcriptomics to investigate defects in mammary epithelial cell differentiation accompanied by distinct microenvironmental alterations in preneoplastic breast tissues from BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and normal breast tissues from non-carrier controls. We uncovered spatially defined receptor-ligand interactions in these tissues for the investigation of autocrine and paracrine signaling. We discovered that β1-integrin-mediated autocrine signaling in BRCA2-deficient mammary epithelial cells may differ from BRCA1-deficient mammary epithelial cells. In addition, we found that the epithelial-to-stromal paracrine signaling in the breast tissues of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers is greater than in control tissues. More integrin-ligand pairs were differentially correlated in BRCA1/2-mutant breast tissues than non-carrier breast tissues with more integrin receptor-expressing stromal cells. Implications: These results suggest alterations in the communication between mammary epithelial cells and the microenvironment in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, laying the foundation for designing innovative breast cancer chemo-prevention strategies for high-risk patients.
2023-10-11 | GSE234017 | GEO
Project description:The cellular heterogeneity of one patient derived orthotopic breast cancer xenograft model (PDBCX) was investigated using flow cytometry , combined with assessment of in vivo tumorigenicity and whole genome expression profiling. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) was revealed as a highly specific cell surface marker of the human tumor cell population in both xenografts. Based on expression patterns observed in primary tumor tissue, SSEA-4 and CD24 were chosen as markers to further subdivide the luminal tumor cells into four subpopulations. FACS sorting was used to isolate four cell subpopulations. Results: In vivo tumorigenicity assay showed that SSEA-4+/CD24+ cells were non-tumorigenic, while the three other subpopulations were tumorigenic. Tumors resulting from the SSEA-4+/CD24- subpopulation of luminal cancer cells, did not express CD24, while tumors arising from the SSEA-4-/CD24-, and SSEA-4-/CD24+ populations both recapitulated the original tumor containing all four subpopulations. Whole genome expression analysis revealed distinct transcriptional profiles, and 44 genes were significantly differentially expressed when comparing the tumorigenic vs non-tumorigenic populations. Several interesting genes putatively suppressing the cancer cells ability to initiate tumors in vivo were upregulated in the non-tumorigenic population. We here show that tumor initiating cells within one primary tumor evidently included more than one phenotype. Furthermore, with respect to cell surface marker expression, one of the subpopulations produced tumors unlike both the originating cells, and the original tumor. Discussion: Our results imply that subpopulations from one primary tumor can give rise to dissimilar daughter tumors. These tumors may not necessarily respond to the same targeted treatment, and thereby represent a therapy escape mechanism. This study highlights that to remove the risk of breast cancer recurrence, inhibition of the molecules critical for driving the tumor progression in several tumor cell subpopulations might be essential Gene expression was measured in four cell subpopulations isolated from Patient derived human luminal-like breast cancer xenograft. Four replicates from three subpopulations and three replicates from one subpopulation.
2015-05-26 | E-GEOD-48384 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:To delineate epithelial subpopulations in mouse mammary tissue, hematopoietic and endothelial cells were depleted from freshly isolated cell suspensions derived from mammary glands using fluorescence-activated cell sorting. The resultant Lin- population was fractionated into four distinct subpopulations using antibodies against CD29, CD24 and CD61. Based on the immunohistochemical phenotype, and in vivo and in vitro functional assays, these subpopulations were identified as fibroblast-containing stromal (CD29loCD24-), mammary stem cell (MaSC)-enriched (CD29hiCD24+CD61+), luminal progenitor (CD29loCD24+CD61+), and mature luminal (CD29loCD24+CD61-) cell subpopulations. Microarray profiling was used to derive gene expression signatures of these 4 subpopulations. The four mammary cell subpopulations were found to have distinct gene expression profiles. Four mammary cell subpopulations from 3-5 pooled mouse tissues were analysed. MS is for the MaSC-enriched cell subpopulation. LP is for the Luminal Progenitor subpopulation. ML is for the Mature Luminal subpopulation.
2010-03-20 | E-GEOD-19446 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:To delineate epithelial subpopulations in mouse mammary tissue, hematopoietic and endothelial cells were depleted from freshly isolated cell suspensions derived from mammary glands using fluorescence-activated cell sorting. The resultant Lin- population was fractionated into four distinct subpopulations using antibodies against CD29, CD24 and CD61. Based on the immunohistochemical phenotype, and in vivo and in vitro functional assays, these subpopulations were identified as fibroblast-containing stromal (CD29loCD24-), mammary stem cell (MaSC)-enriched (CD29hiCD24+CD61+), luminal progenitor (CD29loCD24+CD61+), and mature luminal (CD29loCD24+CD61-) cell subpopulations. Microarray profiling was used to derive gene expression signatures of these 4 subpopulations. The four mammary cell subpopulations were found to have distinct gene expression profiles.
2010-03-21 | GSE19446 | GEO
Project description:The cellular heterogeneity of one patient derived orthotopic breast cancer xenograft model PDX was investigated using flow cytometry, combined with assessment of in vivo tumorigenicity and SNP genotyping array for copy number analysis. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) was revealed as a highly specific cell surface marker of the human tumor cell population in both xenografts. Based on expression patterns observed in primary tumor tissue, SSEA-4 and CD24 were chosen as markers to further subdivide the luminal tumor cells into four subpopulations. FACS sorting was used to isolate four cell subpopulations. Results: In vivo tumorigenicity assay showed that SSEA-4+/CD24+ cells were non-tumorigenic, while the three other subpopulations were tumorigenic. Tumors resulting from the SSEA-4+/CD24- subpopulation of luminal cancer cells, did not express CD24, while tumors arising from the SSEA-4-/CD24-, and SSEA-4-/CD24+ populations both recapitulated the original tumor containing all four subpopulations. Copy number analysis comparing the four subpopulations between eachother, did reveal high similarity. Although there were some minor differencies between the subpopulations, no differences in genome aberrations could explain their difference in tumorigenicity. Discussion: Our results imply that subpopulations from one primary tumor can give rise to dissimilar daughter tumors. These tumors may not necessarily respond to the same targeted treatment, and thereby represent a therapy escape mechanism. This study highlights that to remove the risk of breast cancer recurrence, inhibition of the molecules critical for driving the tumor progression in several tumor cell subpopulations might be essential Four subpopulations were analysed using Infinium HumanOmniExpressExome BeadChip array. Replicates are not included, the HumanOmniExpressExome-8v1-2_A.egt file was used as a reference.
2015-05-26 | E-GEOD-54595 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The cellular heterogeneity of one patient derived orthotopic breast cancer xenograft model PDX was investigated using flow cytometry, combined with assessment of in vivo tumorigenicity and SNP genotyping array for copy number analysis. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) was revealed as a highly specific cell surface marker of the human tumor cell population in both xenografts. Based on expression patterns observed in primary tumor tissue, SSEA-4 and CD24 were chosen as markers to further subdivide the luminal tumor cells into four subpopulations. FACS sorting was used to isolate four cell subpopulations. Results: In vivo tumorigenicity assay showed that SSEA-4+/CD24+ cells were non-tumorigenic, while the three other subpopulations were tumorigenic. Tumors resulting from the SSEA-4+/CD24- subpopulation of luminal cancer cells, did not express CD24, while tumors arising from the SSEA-4-/CD24-, and SSEA-4-/CD24+ populations both recapitulated the original tumor containing all four subpopulations. Copy number analysis comparing the four subpopulations between eachother, did reveal high similarity. Although there were some minor differencies between the subpopulations, no differences in genome aberrations could explain their difference in tumorigenicity. Discussion: Our results imply that subpopulations from one primary tumor can give rise to dissimilar daughter tumors. These tumors may not necessarily respond to the same targeted treatment, and thereby represent a therapy escape mechanism. This study highlights that to remove the risk of breast cancer recurrence, inhibition of the molecules critical for driving the tumor progression in several tumor cell subpopulations might be essential
2015-05-26 | GSE54595 | GEO
Project description:The CD44hi compartment in human breast cancer is enriched in tumor-initiating cells, however the functional heterogeneity within this subpopulation remains poorly defined. From a human breast cancer cell line with a known bi-lineage phenotype we have isolated and cloned CD44hi populations that exhibited mesenchymal/Basal B and luminal/Basal A features, respectively:CD44+/CD24-,Basal B (G4, H6) cells and CD44hi/CD24lo epithelioid Basal A (A4, AB) cells.
2015-04-30 | GSE59281 | GEO
Project description:The CD44hi compartment in human breast cancer is enriched in tumor-initiating cells, however the functional heterogeneity within this subpopulation remains poorly defined. From a human breast cancer cell line with a known bi-lineage phenotype we have isolated and cloned CD44hi populations that exhibited mesenchymal/Basal B and luminal/Basal A features, respectively:CD44+/CD24-,Basal B (G4, H6) cells and CD44hi/CD24lo epithelioid Basal A (A4, AB) cells. Seven replicates of A4, seven replicates of G4, three replicates of AB, three replicates of H6
2015-04-30 | E-GEOD-59281 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:We have analyzed, using DNA microarrays, putative differences in gene-expression level between hereditary BRCA1 mutation-linked and sporadic breast cancer. Our results show that a previously reported marked difference between BRCA1-mutation linked and sporadic breast cancer was probably due to uneven stratification of samples with different ER status and basal-like versus luminal-like subtype. We observed that apparent difference between BRCA1-linked and other types of breast cancer found in univariate analysis was diminished when data were corrected for ER status and molecular subtype in multivariate analyses. In fact, the difference in gene expression pattern of BRCA1-mutated and sporadic cancer is very discrete. These conclusions were supported by the results of Q-PCR validation. We also found that BRCA1 gene inactivation due to promoter hypermethylation had similar effect on general gene expression profile as mutation-induced protein truncation. This suggests that in the molecular studies of hereditary breast cancer, BRCA1 gene methylation should be recognized and considered together with gene mutation. We analyzed 35 breast cancer specimens. Surgical samples obtained during mastectomy were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C. Only samples from patients without neoadjuvant chemotherapy were used in this study as chemotherapy may seriously affect gene expression profile. All tissue samples were collected at the Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin. Seventeen tumor samples were collected from patients with hereditary breast cancer: 12 were derived from tumors affecting women with hereditary BRCA1 mutation, the only one from a woman with BRCA2 mutation, while another eight cases had familial history of breast/ovarian cancer, but were negative for the BRCA1/2 mutations (so called BRCAx cases). Proportion of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutated tumors was typical for the Polish population. Ten samples were derived from patients with apparently sporadic disease (no familial history of cancer) while 4 patients had a history of familial cancer aggregation (FCA) but without prevalence of breast/ovarian cancers. Thus, these samples were merged with sporadic samples in most of the analyses. All BRCA1 mutation-linked tumors in our study were negative for estrogen receptor (by immunohistochemistry, standard procedures for ER, PGR and HER2 staining were applied), while the only BRCA2-mutated tumor was ER-positive. There were 26 ductal and 5 medullary carcinomas within the study group, which is consistent with the distribution of histopathological types in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Patients were diagnosed at stage T1-2, N0-1 and M0. Caution: this submission contains the data from 6 microarrays done on the normal/pathologically unchanged breast tissue from breast cancer patiets. The data from normal tissues was not analyzed in the paper BRCA1-related gene signature in breast cancer is strongly influenced by ER status and molecular type by Lisowska et al., 2011, Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2011 Jan 1;3:125-36
2013-09-05 | E-GEOD-50567 | biostudies-arrayexpress