Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Universal prediction of cell cycle position using transfer learning

ABSTRACT: The cell cycle is a highly conserved, continuous process which controls faithful replication and division of cells. Single-cell technologies have enabled increasingly precise measurements of the cell cycle as both as a biological process of interest and as a possible confounding factor. Despite its importance and conservation, there is no universally applicable approach to infer position in the cell cycle with high-resolution from single-cell RNA-seq data. Here, we present tricycle, an R/Bioconductor package,to address this challenge by leveraging key features of the biology of the cell cycle, the mathematical properties of principal component analysis of periodic functions, and the ubiquitous applicability of transfer learning. We show that tricycle can predict any cell’s position in the cell cycle regardless of the cell type, species of origin, and even sequencing assay. The accuracy of tricycle compares favorably to gold-standard experimental assays which generally require specialized measurements in specifically constructed in vitro systems. Unlike gold-standard assays, tricycle is applicable to any single-cell RNA-seq dataset. Tricycle is highly scalable, universally accurate, and eminently pertinent for atlas-level data.

ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus

PROVIDER: GSE171636 | GEO | 2021/04/07

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Quantitative assessment of single-cell RNA sequencing methods

2013-10-20 | GSE51254 | GEO

Direct comparison of mass cytometry and single-cell RNA sequencing of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells

Project description:Single-cell methods offer a high-resolution approach for characterizing cell populations. Many studies rely on single-cell transcriptomics to draw conclusions regarding cell state and behavior, with the underlying assumption that transcriptomic readouts largely parallel their protein counterparts and subsequent activity. However, the relationship between transcriptomic and proteomic measurements is imprecise, and thus datasets that probe the extent of their concordance will be useful to refine such conclusions. Additionally, novel single-cell analysis tools often lack appropriate gold standard datasets for the purposes of assessment. Integrative (combining the two data modalities) and predictive (using one modality to improve results from the other) approaches in particular, would benefit from transcriptomic and proteomic data from the same sample of cells. For these reasons, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing, mass cytometry, and flow cytometry on a split-sample of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. We directly compare the proportions of specific cell types resolved by each technique, and further describe the extent to which protein and mRNA measurements correlate within distinct cell types.

2024-02-16 | GSE225431 | GEO

A quantitative model for the transcriptional landscape of the bacterial cell cycle

Project description:Regulation of gene activity during the cell cycle is fundamental to bacterial replication but is challenging to study in unperturbed, asynchronous bacterial populations. Using single cell RNA-sequencing of heterogeneous Staphylococcus aureus populations, we uncovered a global gene expression pattern dominated by chromosomal position. We show that this pattern results from the effect of DNA replication on gene expression, and in Escherichia coli, changes under different growth rates and modes of replication. By constructing a quantitative model in each species that links replication to cell cycle gene expression, we identified divergent genes that may be instead subject to distinct regulation, and applied this cell cycle framework to characterize heterogeneity in responses to antibiotic stress. Our approach reveals a highly dynamic cell cycle transcriptional landscape and may be broadly applicable across species.

2023-05-02 | GSE217715 | GEO

A simple method to quantify protein abundances from one thousand cells

Project description:The rise of single-cell transcriptomics has created an urgent need for similar approaches that use a minimal number of cells to quantify expression levels of proteins. We integrated and optimized multiple recent developments to establish a proteomics workflow to quantify proteins from as few as 1,000 mammalian stem cells. The method uses chemical peptide labeling, does not require specific equipment other than cell lysis tools, and quantifies >2,500 proteins with high reproducibility. We validated the method by comparing mouse embryonic stem cells and in vitro differentiated motor neurons. We identify differentially expressed proteins with small fold-changes, and a dynamic range in abundance similar to that of standard methods. Protein abundance measurements obtained with our protocol compare well to corresponding transcript abundance and to measurements using standard inputs. The protocol is also applicable to other systems, such as FACS-purified cells from the tunicate Ciona. Therefore, we offer a straightforward and accurate method to acquire proteomics data from minimal input samples.

2020-07-16 | PXD019363 | Pride

Single-cell temporal transcriptomics of the human cell cycle

Project description:We present the first comprehensive map of spatiotemporal heterogeneity of the human proteome by integrating proteomics at subcellular resolution, single-cell transcriptomics, and pseudotime measurements of each cell within the cell cycle. The cell cycle transcriptomic data in this series provide context for single-cell proteomic measurements of the cell cycle, and this subsequent single-cell proteogenomic analysis that can be found in this code repository: https://github.com/CellProfiling/SingleCellProteogenomics .

2020-12-11 | GSE146773 | GEO

Quantitative assessment of single-cell RNA sequencing methods

Project description:We generated single-cell transcriptomes from a large number of single cells using several commercially available platforms, in both microliter and nanoliter volumes, and compared performance between them. We benchmarked each method to conventional RNA-seq of the same sample using bulk total RNA, as well as to multiplexed qPCR, which is the current gold standard for quantitative single-cell gene expression analysis. In doing so, we were able to systematically evaluate the sensitivity, precision, and accuracy of various approaches to single-cell RNA-seq. Our results show that it is possible to use single-cell RNA-seq to perform quantitative transcriptome measurements of individual cells, that it is possible to obtain quantitative and accurate gene expression measurements with a relatively small number of sequencing reads, and that when such measurements are performed on large numbers of cells, one can recapitulate the bulk transcriptome complexity, and the distributions of gene expression levels found by single-cell qPCR. 109 single-cell human transcriptomes were analyzed in total; 96 using nanoliter volume sample processing on a microfluidic platform, Nextera library prep (biological replicates); 3 using the SMARTer cDNA synthesis kit, Nextera library prep (biological replicates); 3 using the Transplex cDNA synthesis kit, Nextera library prep (biological replicates); 7 using the Ovation Nugen cDNA synthesis kit (biological replicates) where 3 used Nextera library prep and 4 used NEBNext library prep. In addition, 4 bulk RNA samples were sequenced: bulk RNA generated using ~1 million pooled cells was used to make bulk libraries, 2 of which were made using SMARTer cDNA synthesis kit (technical replicates) and 2 made using Superscript RT kit with no amplification (technical replicates). All 4 bulk samples were made into libraries using Nextera.

2013-10-20 | E-GEOD-51254 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Saturation mutagenesis of disease-associated regulatory elements

Project description:The majority of common variants associated with common diseases, as well as an unknown proportion of causal mutations for rare diseases, fall in noncoding regions of the genome. Although catalogs of noncoding regulatory elements are steadily improving, we have a limited understanding of the functional effects of mutations within them. Here, we performed saturation mutagenesis in conjunction with massively parallel reporter assays on 20 disease-associated gene promoters and enhancers, generating functional measurements for over 30,000 single nucleotide substitution and deletion mutations. We find that the density of putative transcription factor binding sites varies widely between regulatory elements, as does the extent to which evolutionary conservation or various integrative scores predict functional effects. These data provide a powerful resource for interpreting the pathogenicity of clinically observed mutations in these disease-associated regulatory elements, and also comprise a gold-standard dataset for the further development of algorithms that aim to predict the regulatory effects of noncoding mutations.

2019-02-15 | GSE126550 | GEO

Transcriptome profiles derived from parallel venipuncture, dried blood spot (DBS), and saliva samples

Project description:Comparison of transcript abundance estimates derived from DBS vs saliva vs gold standard peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples.

2016-07-27 | GSE79269 | GEO

Universal prediction of cell cycle position using transfer learning

Project description:Universal prediction of cell cycle position using transfer learning

| PRJNA720385 | ENA

Benchmarking of RNA-sequencing analysis workflows using whole-transcriptome RT-qPCR expression data

Project description:RNA-sequencing has become the gold standard for whole-transcriptome gene expression quantification. Multiple algorithms have been developed to derive gene counts from sequencing reads. While a number of benchmarking studies have been conducted, the question remains how individual methods perform at accurately quantifying gene expression levels from RNA-sequencing reads. We performed an independent benchmarking study using RNA-sequencing data from the well established MAQCA and MAQCB reference samples. RNA-sequencing reads were processed using five popular workflows (Tophat-HTSeq, Tophat-Cufflinks, STAR-HTSeq, Kallisto and Salmon) and resulting gene expression measurements were compared to expression data generated by wet-lab validated qPCR assays for all protein coding genes. All methods showed high gene expression rank correlations with qPCR data. When comparing gene expression fold changes between MAQCA and MAQCB samples, about 85% of the genes showed consistent results between RNA-sequencing and qPCR data. Of note, each method revealed a small but specific set of genes with inconsistent expression measurements. A significant proportion of these method-specific inconsistent genes were reproducibly identified in independent datasets. These genes were typically smaller, had fewer exons and were lower expressed compared to genes with consistent expression measurements. We propose that careful validation is warranted when evaluating RNA-seq based expression profiles for this specific set of genes.

2017-01-31 | GSE83402 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data