Transcriptomic Landscape of Treatment - Naïve Non-Erosive Reflux Disease
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE182974 | GEO | 2021/12/01
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Erosive Esophagitis (EE) is one of the common forms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We performed transcriptomic analysis (RNA sequencing) of esophageal biopsies from patients with EE and healthy controls to increase understanding of complex cellular and molecular pathways in EE.
2024-10-01 | GSE190027 | GEO
Project description:Saliva is the most important biological factor to protect against erosive tooth wear (ETW). Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients have an increased risk of ETW due to the frequent presence of intrinsic acids in the oral cavity. Remarkably, not all GERD patients suffer from ETW, which might be due to differences in the composition of the saliva.
2022-01-19 | PXD030712 | Pride
Project description:Identification of Novel Immune Cell Signature in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Altered Mucosal Mast Cells and Dendritic Cell Profile. The mechanisms underlying the most troublesome symptom of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), heartburn, remain incompletely understood. The pathogenesis of heartburn in GERD is likely to involve not only central mechanisms of sensitization including hypervigilance, but also multiple mucosal factors including maintenance of epithelial barrier integrity via tight junction proteins, expression of acid-sensing ion channels on nerve endings, and mucosal inflammation . We hypothesized that immune cell components play a regulatory role in mucosal mechanisms of sensitization in GERD, and aimed to identify differences in the immune cell signature and sensory mucosal markers between reflux phenotypes and healthy asymptomatic subjects.
2023-11-20 | GSE226303 | GEO
Project description:Transcriptomic Landscape of Treatment - Naïve Non-Erosive Reflux Disease
| PRJNA758571 | ENA
Project description:Transcriptional profiling of adult esophageal epithelium comparing wild-type mice with Nrf2-/- mice with or without gastroesophageal reflux for 4 weeks. Goal was to determine the role of Nrf2 on the barrier function of mouse esophageal epithelium. Two-class comparisons. Wild-type/without reflux vs. Nrf2-/-/without reflux; Wild-type/gastric reflux vs. Nrf2-/-/gastric reflux; Wild-type/duodenal reflux vs. Nrf2-/-/duodenal reflux; Wild-type/mixed reflux vs. Nrf2-/-/mixed reflux. Biological replicates: 3 replicates for each group.
2013-01-01 | E-GEOD-39629 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The major aetiological risk factor for Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma is gastroesophageal reflux. This study's aim was to identify genes involved in the celular response to reflux in vitro. The Barrettâ??s oesophagus cell line, CP-A hTERT, was exposed to media with acid, deoxycholic acid or a primary bile salt mixture. RNA expression was compared with controls on Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 arrays. In CP-A hTERT, the greatest number of changes in gene expression was observed after treatment with deoxycholic acid, pH 4.5; 152 genes were up-regulated at 2 hours (91 at 6 hours) and 10 down-regulated at 2 hours (34 at 6 hours). 12 genes were identified and were subsequently assessed in patients with non-erosive reflux disease, oesophagitis, Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma; Background and Aims: The major etiological risk factor for Barrettâ??s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma is gastro-esophageal reflux. This studyâ??s aim was to identify genes involved in the cellular response to components of reflux both in vitro and in patients with reflux-related disease. Methods: The Barrettâ??s cell line, CP-A hTERT, was exposed to media with acid, deoxycholic acid or a primary bile salt mixture. RNA expression was compared with controls on Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 arrays. 12 genes of interest were analysed by Real Time PCR both in cell line and biopsies from 110 patients with non-erosive reflux disease, esophagitis, Barrettâ??s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Results: In CP-A hTERT, the greatest number of changes in gene expression was observed after treatment with deoxycholic acid, pH 4.5. Of 12 genes analysed in biopsies, 10 were significantly different between the 4 groups with the largest change for anterior gradient homolog 2, which may modulate p53 function. This had highest expression in biopsies from Barrettâ??s esophagus (median gene fold change for Barrettâ??s esophagus versus non-erosive reflux disease, 411.2 (95% CI 290.5-682.7; p<0.01); esophageal adenocarcinoma versus non-erosive reflux disease 68.1 (20.5-161.4; p<0.01)). In addition 4 genes associated with development/differentiation were upregulated in Barrettâ??s biopsies compared to those from non-erosive reflux disease (SEL1L, MFNG, CRIP1 and EFNA1). Conclusions: Novel genes have been identified, whose expression is altered after acid and bile exposure in vitro and in biopsies from patients with reflux related diseases. These genes may have utility as biomarkers of response to reflux and should be assessed in prospective studies. Experiment Overall Design: The Barrett's oesophagus cell line CP-A hTERT was treated with a 15 minute exposure of acid (pH 4.5), a mixture of primary bile acids (pH 4.5) or deoxycholic acid (pH 4.5). RNA extraction occurred in treatment and non-treated cells at 2 hours and 6 hours. The treatments were performed in duplicate on 2 different days. RNA was compared in each treatment to each control at the relevant time points, in a 2 x 2 manner by using Affymetrex U133 Plus 2.0 arrays. Results of 12 genes were confirmed by Real Time PCR and were subsequently assessed in patients with non-erosive reflux disease, oesophagitis, Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma.
2008-06-16 | E-GEOD-9768 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Transcriptional profiling of adult esophageal epithelium comparing wild-type mice with Nrf2-/- mice with or without gastroesophageal reflux for 4 weeks. Goal was to determine the role of Nrf2 on the barrier function of mouse esophageal epithelium.
2013-01-01 | GSE39629 | GEO
Project description:The gut and local esophageal microbiome progressively shift from healthy commensal bacteria to inflammatory-linked pathogenic bacteria in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). However, mechanisms by which microbial communities contribute to reflux-driven EAC remain incompletely understood and challenging to target. Herein, we utilized a rat reflux-induced EAC model to investigate targeting the gut microbiome-esophageal metabolome axis with cranberry proanthocyanidins (C-PAC) to inhibit EAC progression. Sprague Dawley rats, with or without reflux-induction received water or C-PAC ad libitum (700 µg/rat/day) for 25 or 40 weeks. C-PAC exerted prebiotic activity abrogating reflux-induced dysbiosis, and mitigating bile acid metabolism and transport, culminating in significant inhibition of EAC through TLR/NF-κB/TP53 signaling cascades. At the species level, C-PAC mitigated reflux-induced pathogenic bacteria (Streptococcus parasanguinis, Escherichia coli, and Proteus mirabilis). C-PAC specifically reversed reflux-induced bacterial, inflammatory and immune-implicated proteins and genes including Ccl4, Cd14, Crp, Cxcl1, Il6, Il1β, Lbp, Lcn2, Myd88, Nfkb1, Tlr2 and Tlr4 aligning with changes in human EAC progression, as confirmed through public databases. C-PAC is a safe promising dietary constituent that may be utilized alone or potentially as an adjuvant to current therapies to prevent EAC progression through ameliorating reflux-induced dysbiosis, inflammation and cellular damage.
2024-02-08 | GSE254633 | GEO
Project description:The major aetiological risk factor for Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma is gastroesophageal reflux. This study's aim was to identify genes involved in the celular response to reflux in vitro. The Barrett’s oesophagus cell line, CP-A hTERT, was exposed to media with acid, deoxycholic acid or a primary bile salt mixture. RNA expression was compared with controls on Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 arrays. In CP-A hTERT, the greatest number of changes in gene expression was observed after treatment with deoxycholic acid, pH 4.5; 152 genes were up-regulated at 2 hours (91 at 6 hours) and 10 down-regulated at 2 hours (34 at 6 hours). 12 genes were identified and were subsequently assessed in patients with non-erosive reflux disease, oesophagitis, Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma Background and Aims: The major etiological risk factor for Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma is gastro-esophageal reflux. This study’s aim was to identify genes involved in the cellular response to components of reflux both in vitro and in patients with reflux-related disease. Methods: The Barrett’s cell line, CP-A hTERT, was exposed to media with acid, deoxycholic acid or a primary bile salt mixture. RNA expression was compared with controls on Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 arrays. 12 genes of interest were analysed by Real Time PCR both in cell line and biopsies from 110 patients with non-erosive reflux disease, esophagitis, Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Results: In CP-A hTERT, the greatest number of changes in gene expression was observed after treatment with deoxycholic acid, pH 4.5. Of 12 genes analysed in biopsies, 10 were significantly different between the 4 groups with the largest change for anterior gradient homolog 2, which may modulate p53 function. This had highest expression in biopsies from Barrett’s esophagus (median gene fold change for Barrett’s esophagus versus non-erosive reflux disease, 411.2 (95% CI 290.5-682.7; p<0.01); esophageal adenocarcinoma versus non-erosive reflux disease 68.1 (20.5-161.4; p<0.01)). In addition 4 genes associated with development/differentiation were upregulated in Barrett’s biopsies compared to those from non-erosive reflux disease (SEL1L, MFNG, CRIP1 and EFNA1). Conclusions: Novel genes have been identified, whose expression is altered after acid and bile exposure in vitro and in biopsies from patients with reflux related diseases. These genes may have utility as biomarkers of response to reflux and should be assessed in prospective studies. Keywords: Acid (pH 4.5) and bile (mixture of primary bile salts or the secondary bile salt deoxycholic acid, both at pH 4.5) challenge to a Barrett's oesophagus cell line. RNA extraction at 2 and 6 hours. Comparison of treatment RNA to control (non-treatment) RNA,
2007-12-05 | GSE9768 | GEO
Project description:Patients with Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) require long-lasting resolution of inflammation to prevent fibrostenosis and dysphagia. However, the dissociation between symptoms and histologic improvement suggests persistent molecular drivers despite remission. We aimed to characterize persisting molecular alterations in pediatric patients with EoE using tissue proteomics. Esophageal tissue biopsies (n=151) and clinical data were collected prospectively from pediatric patients with EoE (N=34), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD; N=10; inflammatory controls) or functional disorders (FD; N=20; non-inflammatory controls). Biospies (n=131) acquired from the diagnostic endoscopy and up to 7 follow-ups were considered for proteome analysis in patients with EoE, while for GERD and FD only biopsies from initial diagnosis were included. Histologically active EoE (15 eosinophils per high power field (hpf)) was diagnosed in 79 biopsies and 52 samples derived from patients with EoE in remission (15 eosinophils per hpf). After microdissection of the epithelium proteins were extracted from the esophageal tissue followed by a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Proteomic analysis identified 3,704 different proteins in total across all samples.
2024-09-23 | PXD052250 | Pride