Gene profile of human CD14+ monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE188278 | GEO | 2022/03/24
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Identification of genes differentially expressed between human CD14+CD16- and CD16+ monocyte-derived macrophages generated in the presence of either GM-CSF (termed GM14 and GM16, respectively) or M-CSF (termed M14 and M16, respectively) Human peripheral CD14+CD16- and CD16+ blood monocytes from three independent healthy donors (D1, D2 and D3) were isolated by positive selection from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) using magnetic separation systems (MACS, Miltenyi Biotec). Briefly, PBMC were first incubated with MACS anti-CD56 antibody conjugated to paramagnetic microbeads in order to eliminate the NK (CD16+) cell fraction. NK-depleted PBMC were further incubated with MACS anti-CD16 antibody to isolate CD16+ monocytes. CD56-CD16- PBMC were finally incubated with MACS anti-CD14 antibody to obtain the CD14+CD16- monocyte fraction. Monocytes were cultured for 7 days in medium containing either GM-CSF or M-CSF. Total RNA from each condition was extracted using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen) and hybridized to an Agilent Human Whole Genome (4x44) Oligo Microarray. All experimental procedures were performed following manufacturer instructions.
2015-04-21 | E-GEOD-68061 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Monocytes are a heterogeneous cell population with subset-specific functions and phenotypes. The differential expression of CD14 and CD16 distinguishes classical CD14++CD16-, intermediate CD14++CD16+ and non-classical CD14+CD16++ monocytes. However, CD14++CD16+ monocytes remain the most poorly characterized subset so far. Therefore we analyzed the transcriptomes of the three monocyte subsets using SuperSAGE in combination with high-throughput sequencing. Analysis of 5,487,603 tags revealed unique identifiers of CD14++CD16+ monocytes, delineating these cells from the two other monocyte subsets. CD14++CD16+ monocytes were linked to antigen processing and presentation (e.g. CD74, HLA-DR, IFI30, CTSB), to inflammation and monocyte activation (e.g. TGFB1, AIF1, PTPN6), and to angiogenesis (e.g. TIE2, CD105). Therefore we provide genetic evidence for a distinct role of CD14++CD16+ monocytes in human immunity. Human monocyte subsets (CD14++CD16-, CD14++CD16+, CD14+CD16++) were isolated from 12 healthy volunteers based on MACS technology. Total RNA from monocyte subsets was isolated and same aliquots from each donor and monocyte subset were matched for SuperSAGE. Three SuperSAGE libraries (CD14++CD16-, CD14++CD16+ and CD14+CD16++) were generated.
2011-07-24 | E-GEOD-30811 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Monocytes are a heterogeneous cell population with subset-specific functions and phenotypes. The differential expression of CD14 and CD16 distinguishes classical CD14++CD16-, intermediate CD14++CD16+ and non-classical CD14+CD16++ monocytes. However, CD14++CD16+ monocytes remain the most poorly characterized subset so far. Therefore we analyzed the transcriptomes of the three monocyte subsets using SuperSAGE in combination with high-throughput sequencing. Analysis of 5,487,603 tags revealed unique identifiers of CD14++CD16+ monocytes, delineating these cells from the two other monocyte subsets. CD14++CD16+ monocytes were linked to antigen processing and presentation (e.g. CD74, HLA-DR, IFI30, CTSB), to inflammation and monocyte activation (e.g. TGFB1, AIF1, PTPN6), and to angiogenesis (e.g. TIE2, CD105). Therefore we provide genetic evidence for a distinct role of CD14++CD16+ monocytes in human immunity.
2011-07-24 | GSE30811 | GEO
Project description:Identification of genes differentially expressed between human CD14+CD16- and CD16+ monocyte-derived macrophages generated in the presence of either GM-CSF (termed GM14 and GM16, respectively) or M-CSF (termed M14 and M16, respectively)
2015-04-21 | GSE68061 | GEO
Project description:Monocyte maturation program into macrophages (MΦ) is well-defined in murine gut under homeostatic or inflammatory conditions. Obviously, in vivo tracking of monocytes in inflamed tissues remains difficult in humans. Furthermore, in vitro models fall short in generating the surrogates of transient extravasated tissue inflammatory monocytes. Here, we aimed to unravel environmental cues that replicate in vitro the human monocyte “waterfall” process by first generating tissue-like inflammatory monocytes, and then shifted them towards MΦ. Purified CD14+CD16- monocytes cultured with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), IFNg and IL23 differentiated into CD14+CD163- cells displayed a monocyte-like morphology. The in vitro generated inflammatory CD14+CD163- cells (Infl mo-like), like the CD14+CD163- mo-like cells that accumulate in inflamed colon of Crohn’s disease patients, promoted IL-1β-dependent memory Th17 and Th17/Th1 responses. Next, in vitro generated Infl mo-like cells converted to functional CD163+ MΦ following exposure to TGFβ and IL10. Gene set enrichment analysis further revealed a shared molecular signature between converted CD163+ MΦ and MΦ detected in various inflamed non-lymphoid and lymphoid diseased tissues. Our findings propose a two-step in vitro culture that recapitulates human monocyte maturation cascade in inflamed tissue. Manipulating this process might open therapeutic avenues for chronic inflammatory disorders. Classical CD14+CD16- human monocytes were sorted and cultured for 6 days with GM-CSF+IFNg+IL23, leading to the generation of CD163- d6 cells. Following the 6 days culture with GM-CSF+IFNg+IL23, TGFβ+IL10 were added for another 6 days. This gave rise to the CD163+ d12 and CD163- d12 populations. We used microarray (Clariom D, Affymetrix) to observe molecular differences in the 3 in vitro generated populations: (1) CD163- d6 (2) CD163+ d12 (3) CD163- d12.
2020-06-23 | GSE149722 | GEO
Project description:Identification of genes differentially expressed between human monocyte-macrophages generated in the presence of either GM-CSF (termed M1) or M-CSF (termed M2) Human peripheral blood monocytes from three independent healthy donors (#1, #2 and #3) were isolated by anti-CD14-labeled magnetic microbeads. CD14+ monocytes were cultured for 7 days in RPMI 10% FCS containing either GM-CSF or M-CSF. Total RNA from each condition was extracted and purified using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen). Labelled RNA was used as hybridization probes on human Codelink Whole genome Bioarray. All experimental procedures were performed following manufacturer instructions. Microarrays were scanned with a GenePix 4000B (Axon Instruments) scanner. Scanned images and raw data were processed using the Codelink Expression Software.
2012-04-12 | E-GEOD-27792 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Comparison of the transcriptome macrophages derived from CD14+ human monocyte-derived macrophages generated in the presence of M-CSF (M-Mphage) or GM-CSF (GM-Mphage) and MTX.
2023-06-14 | GSE228475 | GEO
Project description:Human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) from HDM-allergic donors were compared to MDM from healthy donors. CD14+ monocytes were isolated from donated blood and differentiated in the presence of GM-CSF and TGFb (alveolar-like MDM) for 7 days before havest of RNA
2021-12-31 | E-MTAB-9215 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Gene profile of human CD14+ monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages
| PRJNA778191 | ENA
Project description:The methylation profiles of bisulfite-modified DNA of human CD14+ monocytes were compared with derived immature dendritic cells (GM-CSF/IL-4 ), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (GM-CSF/IL-4/PGE-2), EP2 antagonized myeloid-derived suppressor cells (GM-CSF/IL-4/PGE-2/ PF 04418948 5 µM), EP4 antagonized myeloid-derived suppressor cells (GM-CSF/IL-4/PGE-2/ L-161,982 5 µM) and EP2 + EP4 antagonized myeloid-derived suppressor cells (GM-CSF/IL-4/PGE-2/PF 04418948 5 µM /L-161,982 5 µM) using the Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChips (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA,). This platform allows the interrogation of >485,000 methylation sites per sample at single-nucleotide resolution, and comprises an average of 17 CpG sites per gene in the 99% of RefSeq genes. 96% of CpG islands are covered, with additional coverage in CpG island shores and the regions flanking them. The samples were hybridized in the array following the manufacturer’s instructions.
2017-09-11 | GSE83458 | GEO