Dataset Information

TET2 lesions enhance the aggressiveness of CEBPA-mutant AML by re-balancing GATA2 expression

ABSTRACT: The myeloid transcription factor CEBPA is recurrently biallelically mutated (i.e., double mutated; CEBPADM) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML); with a combination of hypermorphic N-terminal mutations (CEBPANT), promoting expression of the leukemia-associated p30 isoform, and amorphic C-terminal mutations. CEBPADM AML features recurrent co‑occurring mutations; however, insight into the underlying mechanisms for the co-mutational spectra is incomplete. By combining transcriptomic and epigenomic analyses of data from CEBPA-TET2-co-mutant patients with experimental models thereof, we identify GATA2 as a conserved target of the CEBPA-TET2 mutational axis, providing a rationale for the mutational spectra in CEBPADM AML. Mechanistically, we suggest that elevated CEBPA levels, driven by the CEBPANT, mediate recruitment of TET2 to the GATA2 distal hematopoietic enhancer and thereby increase GATA2 expression. Conversely, CEBPADM AML gains a competitive advantage by loss of TET2; decreasing GATA2 promoter demethylation and re-balancing GATA2 levels. Further, demethylating treatment of CEBPA-TET2-co-mutant AML restores GATA2 levels, and prolongs disease latency.

ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus

PROVIDER: GSE214224 | GEO | 2023/08/28

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Shared Molecules

Only show the datasets with similarity scores above: 0.5

Threshold

0.5

Similar Datasets

Project description:The clinical impact of aberrant CEBPA promoter methylation (PM) in AML is controversial discussed. The aim of this study was to clarify the significance of aberrant CEBPA PM with regard to clinical features in a cohort of 572 de novo AML with wildtype CEBPA and normal karyotype. The distal promoter was methylated in 54/572 cases (9.41%) whereas proximal PM was never detected. Methylation of the core promoter was detected in only 8 of 326 cases (2.45%) and thus seems to be a rare event in AML. There was no correlation between CEBPA distal PM, age, sex, white blood cell (WBC) count or Hb levels at diagnosis. We also were not able to detect a significant correlation between the presence of CEBPA distal PM and molecular mutations such as FLT3-ITD, NPM1, AML1, MLL-PTD and IDH1. Solely the frequency of IDH2R140 mutations was significantly reduced in CEBPA distal PM positive compared to CEBPA distal PM negative cases (p=0.01). Furthermore, analysis of CEBPA mRNA expression level revealed no difference between CEBPA distal PM positive and CEBPA distal PM negative cases, suggesting that CEBPA distal PM has no influence on CEBPA expression. CEBPA distal PM did not show impact on overall survival (OS), event free survival (EFS) or incidence of relapse. Also when other mutations were taken into regard no prognostic impact of CEBPA distal PM could be shown. In contrast, a distinct expression profile of CEBPA distal PM positive cases compared to CEBPA mutated and CEBPA distal PM negative cases was observed. In addition, a significantly higher frequency of CEBPA distal PM was detected in RUNX1-RUNX1T1 positive AML compared to the CEBPA witdtype cases. We conclude that the presence of aberrant CEBPA PM has no clinical relevance and is therefore a negligible prognostic marker in de novo AML with normal karyotype. To detect underlying common differences in their gene expression profiles, we investigated 9 CEBPA methylated (unmutated), 8 CEBPA single-mutated, 10 CEBPA double-mutated, and 10 non-methylated/non-mutated cases (Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 microarrays; Santa Clara, CA). The microarray sample preparation assay was performed as previously reported. Gene expression raw data were processed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.