Transcriptome analysis of pulsed activation of MAPK signaling in HEK-RAF-ER cells [RNA_seq_pulse_time_series]
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE250533 | GEO | 2024/01/13
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:The most common oncogenic mutations in multiple myeloma (MM) affect N- and K-RAS leading to constitutive activation of RAS-dependent signaling. Signal transduction via RAS, Raf and MAPK has been well described as a canonical pathway. In accordance with this assumption, we showed that the activity of the MEK/ERK module is strictly dependent on pan-Raf activity. However, inhibition of MEK/ERK has no or only minor effects on MM cell survival, whereas oncogenic Ras and pan-Raf critically contribute to survival of multiple myeloma cells. Therefore, we aimed to learn more about Raf-dependent but MEK-independent signaling effectors. We analyzed gene expression profiles in INA-6 cells after either pan-Raf inhibition with SB-590885 or MEK inhibition with PD-325901.
2016-11-21 | GSE75078 | GEO
Project description:An inducible oncogenic cell line ZFL-ΔRaf1-ER was established, in which oncogenic human Raf-1(ΔRaf1) can be activated in zebrafish liver cells by administration of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4HT). Transcriptional profilling of the ZFL-ΔRaf1-ER cells with and without administration of 4HT and/or the MEK inhibitor U0126 defined the gene signatures transcriptionally regulated by hyperactive Raf/MEK/MAPK signaling in zebrafish liver cells.
2011-07-07 | GSE29308 | GEO
Project description:An inducible oncogenic cell line ZFL-?Raf1-ER was established, in which oncogenic human Raf-1(?Raf1) can be activated in zebrafish liver cells by administration of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4HT). Transcriptional profilling of the ZFL-?Raf1-ER cells with and without administration of 4HT and/or the MEK inhibitor U0126 defined the gene signatures transcriptionally regulated by hyperactive Raf/MEK/MAPK signaling in zebrafish liver cells. The ZFL-?Raf1-ER cells were cultured in 12-well plates till confluence. Cell were starved for 4h in plain medium and susequently treated with or without 1µM 4HT and/or 30µM U0126 for 12h. Biological triplications were taken for each condition.
2011-07-07 | E-GEOD-29308 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:KRAS, mutated in ~30% of all cancers, activates the RAF-MEK-ERK signaling cascade. CRAF is required for growth of KRAS mutant lung tumors, but the requirement for CRAF kinase activity is unknown. Here, we show subsets of KRAS mutant tumors are dependent on CRAF for growth. Kinase-dead but not dimer-defective CRAF rescued growth inhibition suggesting dimerization but not kinase activity is required. Quantitative proteomics demonstrated enrichment of CRAF:ARAF dimers in KRAS mutant cells and depletion of both CRAF and ARAF rescued the CRAF loss phenotype. Mechanistically, CRAF depletion caused sustained ERK activation and induction of cell cycle arrest, while treatment with low dose MEK or ERK inhibitor rescued the CRAF loss phenotype. Our studies highlight the role of CRAF in regulating MAPK signal intensity to promote tumorigenesis downstream of mutant KRAS and suggest disrupting CRAF dimerization or degrading CRAF may have therapeutic benefit.
| EGAS00001005743 | EGA
Project description:In this study we use a (targeted) perturb seq experiment in which we knock out 22 transcription factors downstream of MAPK signalling in order to reconstruct the transcriptional network downstream of RAF/MAPK signaling.
2024-01-13 | GSE250558 | GEO
Project description:The eIF4F translation initiation complex plays a critical role in melanoma resistance to clinical BRAF and MEK inhibitors. In this study, we uncover a novel function of eIF4F in the negative regulation of the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway. We demonstrate that eIF4F is essential for maintaining optimal ERK signaling intensity in treatment-naïve melanoma cells harboring BRAF or NRAS mutations. Specifically, the dual-specificity phosphatase DUSP6/MKP3, which acts as a negative feedback regulator of ERK activity, requires continuous production in an eIF4F-dependent manner to limit excessive ERK signaling driven by oncogenic RAF/RAS mutations. Treatment with small molecule eIF4F inhibitors disrupts the negative feedback control of MAPK signaling, leading to ERK hyperactivation and EGR1 overexpression in melanoma cells in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, our quantitative analyses reveal a high spare signaling capacity in the ERK pathway, suggesting that eIF4F-dependent feedback keeps the majority of ERK molecules inactive under normal conditions. Overall, our findings highlight the crucial role of eIF4F in regulating ERK signaling flux and suggest that pharmacological eIF4F inhibitors can disrupt the negative feedback control of MAPK activity in melanomas with BRAF and NRAS activating mutations.
2024-10-04 | GSE273721 | GEO
Project description:Disruption of the MAPK pathway in cancer by kinase inhibition often fails due to pathway reactivation, causing clinical relapse. Among MAPK inhibitors, type I RAF inhibitors are only active against specific BRAF mutants; MEK inhibitor monotherapy is associated with limited clinical benefits but may serve as a foundation for combinatorial therapy. Here, we show that type II RAF plus allosteric MEK inhibitors durably blunt the development of acquired MEK inhibitor resistance among cancers with KRAS, NRAS, NF1, BRAFnon-V600 and BRAFV600 mutations, when compared to a combination of type II RAF plus ERK inhibitors. Type II RAF and MEK (versus ERK) inhibitors also display superior capacity to sequester MEK in RAF complexes and uncouple MEK and ERK interaction in acquired resistant tumor subpopulations. Systemically and intratumorally, type II RAF plus MEK inhibitors expand memory and activated/exhausted CD8+ T-cells. Whereas trametinib alone temporally reduces dominant intra-tumoral T-cell clones, type II RAF inhibitor co-treatment reverses this effect and promotes T-cell clonotypic expansion and convergence. Importantly, durably control of tumors by this combination requires CD8+ T-cells. Thus, the prolonged anti-tumor efficacy of type II RAF plus MEK inhibitors reveals exquisite MAPK addiction in common lethal cancer histologies, and the mechanisms include unexpected allosteric perturbation of the MAPK pathway and engagement of anti-tumor CD8+ T-cell immunity.
2021-06-06 | GSE158609 | GEO
Project description:Disruption of the MAPK pathway in cancer by kinase inhibition often fails due to pathway reactivation, causing clinical relapse. Among MAPK inhibitors, type I RAF inhibitors are only active against specific BRAF mutants; MEK inhibitor monotherapy is associated with limited clinical benefits but may serve as a foundation for combinatorial therapy. Here, we show that type II RAF plus allosteric MEK inhibitors durably blunt the development of acquired MEK inhibitor resistance among cancers with KRAS, NRAS, NF1, BRAFnon-V600 and BRAFV600 mutations, when compared to a combination of type II RAF plus ERK inhibitors. Type II RAF and MEK (versus ERK) inhibitors also display superior capacity to sequester MEK in RAF complexes and uncouple MEK and ERK interaction in acquired resistant tumor subpopulations. Systemically and intratumorally, type II RAF plus MEK inhibitors expand memory and activated/exhausted CD8+ T-cells. Whereas trametinib alone temporally reduces dominant intra-tumoral T-cell clones, type II RAF inhibitor co-treatment reverses this effect and promotes T-cell clonotypic expansion and convergence. Importantly, durably control of tumors by this combination requires CD8+ T-cells. Thus, the prolonged anti-tumor efficacy of type II RAF plus MEK inhibitors reveals exquisite MAPK addiction in common lethal cancer histologies, and the mechanisms include unexpected allosteric perturbation of the MAPK pathway and engagement of anti-tumor CD8+ T-cell immunity.
2021-06-06 | GSE158608 | GEO
Project description:Disruption of the MAPK pathway in cancer by kinase inhibition often fails due to pathway reactivation, causing clinical relapse. Among MAPK inhibitors, type I RAF inhibitors are only active against specific BRAF mutants; MEK inhibitor monotherapy is associated with limited clinical benefits but may serve as a foundation for combinatorial therapy. Here, we show that type II RAF plus allosteric MEK inhibitors durably blunt the development of acquired MEK inhibitor resistance among cancers with KRAS, NRAS, NF1, BRAFnon-V600 and BRAFV600 mutations, when compared to a combination of type II RAF plus ERK inhibitors. Type II RAF and MEK (versus ERK) inhibitors also display superior capacity to sequester MEK in RAF complexes and uncouple MEK and ERK interaction in acquired resistant tumor subpopulations. Systemically and intratumorally, type II RAF plus MEK inhibitors expand memory and activated/exhausted CD8+ T-cells. Whereas trametinib alone temporally reduces dominant intra-tumoral T-cell clones, type II RAF inhibitor co-treatment reverses this effect and promotes T-cell clonotypic expansion and convergence. Importantly, durably control of tumors by this combination requires CD8+ T-cells. Thus, the prolonged anti-tumor efficacy of type II RAF plus MEK inhibitors reveals exquisite MAPK addiction in common lethal cancer histologies, and the mechanisms include unexpected allosteric perturbation of the MAPK pathway and engagement of anti-tumor CD8+ T-cell immunity.
2021-06-06 | GSE158607 | GEO
Project description:Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC) is a highly lethal malignancy with poor response rate to therapy. An immune suppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) and oncogenic mutations in KRAS have been implicated as drivers of resistance to both conventional and immune therapies. As such, targeting RAS/MAPK signaling is an attractive strategy. However, in practice, MAPK inhibition has not yet shown clinical efficacy, likely due to rapid acquisition resistance in PDAC cells. Tumor intrinsic mechanisms of resistance to RAS/MAPK have been studied, however, the unique PDAC TME may also be a key driver in resistance. Previous studies have shown that FAK inhibition can reprogram the PDAC TME and delay PDAC progression in animal models. Herein, we found that long-term FAK inhibitor treatment leads to hyperactivation of the MAPK pathway in both genetically engineered mouse models and in post-treatment PDAC tissues from FAK inhibitor clinical trials. Concomitant inhibition of both FAK (VS4718) and RAF/MEK (V6766) signaling dramatically suppressed tumor cell growth, leading to increased survival across multiple PDAC mouse models. The mechanisms of synergy include both changes in tumor-intrinsic signaling and modulation of tumor/stroma interactions that drive MEK resistance. In the TME, we found that cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) can impair the downregulation of cMyc by MEK inhibition in PDAC cells. This results in de-novo resistance to MEK inhibition in fibrotic conditions. By contrast, FAK inhibitors reprogram CAFs to suppress the production of key growth factors, including FGF1, that drives resistance to RAF/MEK inhibition. While combined FAK and RAF/MEK inhibition only leads to disease stasis, the addition of chemotherapy to the combination led to tumor regression and improved long-term survival in PDAC mouse models. Analysis of tumor immunity showed that the combination of FAK and MEK inhibition improved anti-tumor immunity and improved priming of T cell responses, which was further improved with the addition of chemotherapy. These findings led to testing of FAK (Defactinib) plus RAF/MEK (Avutometinib) inhibition in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in advanced pancreatic cancer patients (NCT05669482). Finally, we tested if the addition of immunotherapy could enhance the efficacy of the FAKi/MEKi/chemotherapy and found adding in either PD1 or CTLA4/PD1 blockade led to long term disease control in PDAC animal models. Together, these studies identified novel FAK inhibition as a route to overcome both tumor intrinsic and stromal-derived resistance to MAPK inhibition and showed that this combination can be exploited to increase the efficacy of cytotoxic and immunotherapy approaches.
2024-09-04 | GSE247547 | GEO