Comparative analysis of gene expression changes during differentiation in the Drosophila wing
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Investigation of whole genome gene expression level changes in dissected Drosophila wings of the genotype w1118, at the wandering L3 larval stage, 2h, 6h, 18h, 24h and 36h After pupa formation. Stages after pupa formation were compared to the larval L3 stage to identify changes in gene expression. The data included here is further discussed in O’Keefe, Thomas, Edgar and Buttitta (2012). Combinatorial control of temporal gene expression in the Drosophila wing by enhancers and core promoters Submitted to BMC Genomics
Project description:Investigation of whole genome gene expression level changes in dissected Drosophila wings of the genotype w1118, at the wandering L3 larval stage, 2h, 6h, 18h, 24h and 36h After pupa formation. Stages after pupa formation were compared to the larval L3 stage to identify changes in gene expression. The data included here is further discussed in O’Keefe, Thomas, Edgar and Buttitta (2012). Combinatorial control of temporal gene expression in the Drosophila wing by enhancers and core promoters Submitted to BMC Genomics A 24 chip study using total RNA recovered from three to four independently isolated samples of 10 dissected Drosophila wings at the indicated developmental stages from flies with the genotype w1118;+;+ (Bloomington Stock #3605). For sample 36BD, total RNA from sample 36B and 36D were pooled, labeled and hybridized independently.
Project description:Investigation of whole genome gene expression level changes in dissected Drosophila wings at the wandering L3 larval stage, 24h after pupa formation and 36h after pupa formation, expressing either UAS-Cabut or UAS-dE2F1 + UAS-dDP under control of apterous-gal4 with a tubulin driven temperature-sensitive gal80 transgene, compared to the parental strain lacking UAS transgenes.
Project description:Investigation of whole genome gene expression changes in dissected Drosophila wings at the wandering L3 larval stage and 24h after pupa formation, expressing UAS-activated Thickveins Q-D under control of apterous-gal4 with a tubulin driven temperature sensitive gal80 transgene, compared to the parental strain lacking the UAS-Thickveins transgene
Project description:Investigation of whole genome gene expression changes in dissected Drosophila wings at the wandering L3 larval stage and 24h after pupa formation, expressing UAS-activated Thickveins Q-D under control of apterous-gal4 with a tubulin driven temperature sensitive gal80 transgene, compared to the parental strain lacking the UAS-Thickveins transgene A 20 chip study using total RNA recovered from five independently isolated samples of 10 dissected Drosophila wings at the indicated developmental stages expressing UAS-activated thickveins or the non-UAS containing matched control strain.
Project description:Investigation of whole genome gene expression level changes in dissected Drosophila wings at the wandering L3 larval stage, 24h after pupa formation and 36h after pupa formation, expressing either UAS-Cabut or UAS-dE2F1 + UAS-dDP under control of apterous-gal4 with a tubulin driven temperature-sensitive gal80 transgene, compared to the parental strain lacking UAS transgenes. A 36-chip study using total RNA recovered from four independently isolated samples of 10 dissected Drosophila wings at the indicated developmental stages expressing the indicated UAS-transgenes or the non-UAS-containing matched control strain. One sample (2D) did not pass our internal quality control and, therefore, was not included in the analysis. The dE2F1+dDP data included here is further discussed in L. Buttitta, A.J. Katzaroff, B.A. Edgar (2010). A robust cell cycle control mechanism limits E2F-induced proliferation of terminally differentiated cells in vivo. Journal of Cell Biology vol. 189, 981-96 (PMID 20548101). The Cabut data included here is further discussed in A.J. Katzaroff et al. (2011). The Krüppel-like-factor cabut has cell cycle regulatory properties similar to E2F.
Project description:We performed RNA sequencing of wing discs at the wandering L3 larval stage from 32 inbred lines of Drosophila genetic reference panel (DGRP) that consists of 16 big and 16 small wing lines. We aimed to understand system-wide gene regulatory mechanisms that attain the observed natural variation in wing size including the sexual size dimorphism.
Project description:Chronic high sugar feeding induces obesity, hyperglycemia, and insulin resistance in flies and mammals. These phenotypes are controlled by the fat body, a liver- and adipose- like tissue in Drosophila flies. To gain insight into the mechanisms underlying the connection between diet and insulin sensitivity, we used Illumina RNA-seq to profile gene expression in fat bodies isolated from chronically high sugar fed, wandering (post-prandial) third instar wild type larvae w(L3). These data were compared to control-fed wild-type wL3 fat bodies as well as those expressing transgenic interfering RNA (i) targeting CG18362 (Mio/dChREBP) in the fat body on both diets. Female VDRC w1118, cgGAL4, UAS-Dcr2 or UAS-ChREBPi(52606), cgGAL4, UAS-Dcr2 wandering third instar larvae were fed control (0.15M) or high (0.7M) sucrose and fat bodies isolated for RNA extraction.
Project description:Comparative gene expression profiling analysis of RNA-seq data in Drosophila melanogaster L3 larva puffstage 7-9 between male Parg mutants (parg27.1/Y) and yellow white males as a control (w1118, y1/Y)
Project description:We used RNA-seq in a derived European Drosophila melanogaster population from Germany (MU) to examine coding gene expression variation in the larval fat body during the late wandering third instar stage.
Project description:Hox genes regionalize the animal body axis by modifying complex morphogenetic and differentiation processes during development. The transformation of wings into halteres by the Hox gene Ultrabithorax (Ubx) in Drosophila melanogaster presents an excellent model system to study the transcriptional networks that control such complex developmental programmes. We have employed an inducible misexpression system to switch on Ubx in the wing epithelium at successive larval, prepupal and pupal stages, and have used microarray expression profiling to identify the primary transcriptional responses to Ubx. We find that Ubx regulates hundreds of downstream genes, mostly in a subtle manner. These targets are largely distinct at the different stages of appendage development and diversification. We have generated an experimental fly line combining the nabGal4NP3537-driver, a tub-GAL80ts transgene, and a UAS-UbxIa transgene (the control line was carrying a UAS-eGFP transgene instead). Our core microarray analysis has involved comparison of the transcriptional profile of experimental wings carrying the UAS-UbxIa transgene with that of control wings carrying the UAS-eGFP transgene. Pairwise comparisons have been carried out at three successive developmental stages, in particular at (i) the third instar larval wandering stage, about 4hrs before puparium formation at 29˚C, (ii) the prepupal stage, 6hrs after puparium formation (APF) at 29˚C, and (iii) the early pupal stage, 16hrs APF at 29˚C. Moreover, pairwise comparisons have been carried out with samples developed exclusively at 19˚C (UbxIa or eGFP expression OFF), as well as with samples collected at 16hrs after the temperature shift from 19 to 29˚C (UbxIa or eGFP expression ON). This has allowed us to distinguish the Ubx-dependent effects from the intrinsic expression differences between the fly lines used, and from the temperature-induced responses. We have carried out 4 biological replicates for each condition making a total of 48 hybridizations to Affymetrix Drosophila Genome 2.0 arrays.