Identification of microarray probe signals constantly present in multiple sample types
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE39528 | GEO | 2013/06/10
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA171323
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below. Refer to individual Series
2013-06-10 | E-GEOD-39528 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The correlation of the RNA profiles obtained by microarray analysis was compared with that obtained from RNA-Seq by using reduced complexity sperm datasets. This resolved as a series of discordant probes. The extent of discordancy among other datasets was then determined.
2013-06-10 | GSE39527 | GEO
Project description:The correlation of the RNA profiles obtained by microarray analysis was compared with that obtained from RNA-Seq by using reduced complexity sperm datasets. This resolved as a series of discordant probes. The extent of discordancy among other datasets was then determined.
2013-06-10 | GSE39526 | GEO
Project description:The correlation of the RNA profiles obtained by microarray analysis was compared with that obtained from RNA-Seq by using reduced complexity sperm datasets. This resolved as a series of discordant probes. The extent of discordancy among other datasets was then determined. A correlative study between probe’s signal intensity from Illumina bead arrays with its transcript level detected by next generation sequencing technique was performed. RNAs from sperm and testis samples were applied
2013-06-10 | E-GEOD-39527 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The correlation of the RNA profiles obtained by microarray analysis was compared with that obtained from RNA-Seq by using reduced complexity sperm datasets. This resolved as a series of discordant probes. The extent of discordancy among other datasets was then determined. A correlative study between probe’s signal intensity from Illumina bead arrays with its transcript level detected by next generation sequencing technique was performed. RNAs from sperm and testis samples were applied
2013-06-10 | E-GEOD-39526 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:BackgroundCpG methylation levels can help to explain inter-individual differences in phenotypic traits. Few studies have explored whether identifying probe subsets based on their biological and statistical properties can maximise predictions whilst minimising array content. Variance component analyses and penalised regression (epigenetic predictors) were used to test the influence of (i) the number of probes considered, (ii) mean probe variability and (iii) methylation QTL status on the variance captured in eighteen traits by blood DNA methylation. Training and test samples comprised ≤ 4450 and ≤ 2578 unrelated individuals from Generation Scotland, respectively.ResultsAs the number of probes under consideration decreased, so too did the estimates from variance components and prediction analyses. Methylation QTL status and mean probe variability did not influence variance components. However, relative effect sizes were 15% larger for epigenetic predictors based on probes with known or reported methylation QTLs compared to probes without reported methylation QTLs. Relative effect sizes were 45% larger for predictors based on probes with mean Beta-values between 10 and 90% compared to those based on hypo- or hypermethylated probes (Beta-value ≤ 10% or ≥ 90%).ConclusionsArrays with fewer probes could reduce costs, leading to increased sample sizes for analyses. Our results show that reducing array content can restrict prediction metrics and careful attention must be given to the biological and distribution properties of CpG probes in array content selection.
| S-EPMC9367152 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Access to gene expression data has become increasingly common in recent years; however, analysis has become more difficult as it is often desirable to integrate data from different platforms. Probe mapping across microarray platforms is the first and most crucial step for data integration. In this article, we systematically review and compare different approaches to map probes across seven platforms from different vendors: U95A, U133A and U133 Plus 2.0 from Affymetrix, Inc.; HT-12 v1, HT-12v2 and HT-12v3 from Illumina, Inc.; and 4112A from Agilent, Inc. We use a unique data set, which contains 56 lung cancer cell line samples-each of which has been measured by two different microarray platforms-to evaluate the consistency of expression measurement across platforms using different approaches. Based on the evaluation from the empirical data set, the BLAST alignment of the probe sequences to a recent revision of the Transcriptome generated better results than using annotations provided by Vendors or from Bioconductor's Annotate package. However, a combination of all three methods (deemed the 'Consensus Annotation') yielded the most consistent expression measurement across platforms. To facilitate data integration across microarray platforms for the research community, we develop a user-friendly web-based tool, an API and an R package to map data across different microarray platforms from Affymetrix, Illumina and Agilent. Information on all three can be found at http://qbrc.swmed.edu/software/probemapper/.
| S-EPMC3431719 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND: With multiple strains of various pathogens being sequenced, it is necessary to develop high-throughput methods that can simultaneously process multiple bacterial or viral genomes to find common fingerprints as well as fingerprints that are unique to each individual genome. We present algorithmic enhancements to an existing single-genome pipeline that allows for efficient design of microarray probes common to groups of target genomes. The enhanced pipeline takes advantage of the similarities in the input genomes to narrow the search to short, nonredundant regions of the target genomes and, thereby, significantly reduces the computation time. The pipeline also computes a three-state hybridization matrix, which gives the expected hybridization of each probe with each target. RESULTS: Design of microarray probes for eight pathogenic Burkholderia genomes shows that the multiple-genome pipeline is nearly four-times faster than the single-genome pipeline for this application. The probes designed for these eight genomes were experimentally tested with one non-target and three target genomes. Hybridization experiments show that less than 10% of the designed probes cross hybridize with non-targets. Also, more than 65% of the probes designed to identify all Burkholderia mallei and B. pseudomallei strains successfully hybridize with a B. pseudomallei strain not used for probe design. CONCLUSION: The savings in runtime suggest that the enhanced pipeline can be used to design fingerprints for tens or even hundreds of related genomes in a single run. Hybridization results with an unsequenced B. pseudomallei strain indicate that the designed probes might be useful in identifying unsequenced strains of B. mallei and B. pseudomallei.
| S-EPMC2596143 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Gene expression index estimation is an essential step in analyzing multiple probe microarray data. Various modeling methods have been proposed in this area. Amidst all, a popular method proposed in Li and Wong (2001) is based on a multiplicative model, which is similar to the additive model discussed in Irizarry et al. (2003a) at the logarithm scale. Along this line, Hu et al. (2006) proposed data transformation to improve expression index estimation based on an ad hoc entropy criteria and naive grid search approach. In this work, we re-examined this problem using a new profile likelihood-based transformation estimation approach that is more statistically elegant and computationally efficient. We demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method using a benchmark Affymetrix U95A spiked-in experiment. Moreover, We introduced a new multivariate expression index and used the empirical study to shows its promise in terms of improving model fitting and power of detecting differential expression over the commonly used univariate expression index. As the other important content of the work, we discussed two generally encountered practical issues in application of gene expression index: normalization and summary statistic used for detecting differential expression. Our empirical study shows somewhat different findings from the MAQC project (MAQC, 2006).
| S-EPMC3989902 | biostudies-literature