Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Systematic evaluation of DNase-seq experimental parameters

ABSTRACT: We systematicaly evaluated two major factors, enzyme digestion level and fragment size, that would affect DNase-seq experiment. We found that while under- or over-digestion sigificantly decreases the DNase-seq signal, there is a broad range of suitable digestion level. In addition, we found fragment smaller than nucleosome size is optimal to identify transcription factor binding events.

ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens

PROVIDER: GSE51915 | GEO | 2013/11/25

SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA225824

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Systematic evaluation of DNase-seq experimental parameters

Project description:We systematicaly evaluated two major factors, enzyme digestion level and fragment size, that would affect DNase-seq experiment. We found that while under- or over-digestion sigificantly decreases the DNase-seq signal, there is a broad range of suitable digestion level. In addition, we found fragment smaller than nucleosome size is optimal to identify transcription factor binding events. We tested digestion level of 5U, 25U, 50U, 75U, 100U and fragment size of 50-100bp, 100-200bp, 200-300bp

2013-11-25 | E-GEOD-51915 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Systematic evaluation of experimental parameters for sensitive phosphoproteomics analysis

Project description:The field of phosphoproteomics has been revolutionized in the last years, with enhanced efficiency and sensitivity, now enabling deep phosphoproteomic analysis single-shot from minimal peptide inputs. In this study, we rigorously evaluate the effects of various experimental parameters in automated Zirconium-IMAC (Zr-IMAC) based phosphoproteomic sample preparation with focus on low peptide input samples. Assessing metrics such as number of identified phosphopeptides, selectivity, phosphosite localization scores and relative purification of multiply phosphorylated phosphopeptides, we were able to pinpoint key influencing variables. Determination of the optimal glycolic acid concentration in the loading buffer, percentage of ammonium hydroxide in the elution buffer, peptide to beads ratio, binding time, sample volume and loading buffer volume, allowed us to confidently localize up to ~15,800 phosphopeptides using 30 µg of peptides as starting material. Furthermore, we evaluated how sequential enrichment can boost the depth of the analysis, and most importantly, whether pooling fractions into a single-LCMS analysis also increases the phosphoproteome depth. As a result, we present a novel strategy based on incremental addition of beads and subsequent fraction pooling, which can boost by 17% the phosphoproteome coverage when compared to standard enrichment.

2024-03-26 | PXD045601 | Pride

TDFragMapper: Evaluating experimental parameters for confident intact protein characterization in top-down proteomics

Project description:New software-tool allowing an easy visualization of fragment ions and thus a rapid evaluation of key experimental parameters on the sequence coverage obtained for the MS/MS analysis of intact proteins. Our tool can deal with multiple fragmentation methods. We demonstrate that TDFragMapper can rapidly highlight the experimental fragmentation parameters that are critical to the characterization of intact proteins of various size using top-down proteomics.

2021-12-30 | PXD024643 | Pride

Systematic Evaluation of Parameters in RNA Cytosine Methylation Analysis

Project description:Here we systematically analysis bisulfite-treated RNA sequencing data (RNA BS-seq) for the purpose of identifying m5C methylation data from mouse neural stem cells. We isolated mitochondrial fractions to better understand the m5C characteristics of RNAs found in these cellular compartments. Throughout the analysis, we identify key parameters to be used in RNA m5C methylation analysis, and identify downstream effects of artifact detection on RNA m5C levels. In addition, we utilized Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs) in conjunction with ERCC (External RNA Controls Consortium) as RNA controls to identify rates of m5C artifcats generated by RNA duplication and PCR amplification error rates. Using various preparation parameters, we identify ideal preparation methods for RNA BS-seq.

2022-04-05 | GSE190614 | GEO

Systematic evaluation of RNA quality and microarray data reliability in human formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded and fresh frozen tissue samples

Project description:We assessed the feasibility and reliability of microarray studies using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue-derived RNA compared with transcriptome data from paired fresh-frozen (FF) material. We established a robust workflow to generate highly reproducible microarray datasets from only 2 ng RNA input. For prior quality assessment, inspection of Agilent Bioanalyzer electropherograms, calculation of RNA fragment size distribution (DV200) and routine qPCR for selected references genes were done.

2018-04-13 | GSE104562 | GEO

Systematic evaluation of RNA quality and microarray data reliability in rat formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded and fresh frozen tissue samples

2018-04-13 | GSE104561 | GEO

Systematic Evaluation of Parameters in RNA Cytosine Methylation Analysis

Project description:Systematic Evaluation of Parameters in RNA Cytosine Methylation Analysis

| PRJNA787668 | ENA

A systematic evaluation of pattern discovery algorithms

Project description:Pattern discovery algorithms are methods for discovering recurrent, non-random motifs widely used in the analysis of biological sequences. Many algorithms exist but few comparisons have been made amongst them. We systematically profile eight representative methods at multiple parameter settings across 174 diverse experimental datasets, including ten novel ChIP-on-chip datasets. We executed 16,777 pattern discovery analyses to assess prediction accuracy, CPU usage and memory consumption. For 144 datasets we developed a gold-standard using machine-learning algorithms; cross-validation was used for the remaining datasets. Performance was highly disparate, with median accuracy ranging from 32% to 96%. Importantly we were unable to replicate previously reported algorithm-rankings, emphasizing the need to use many and diverse experimental datasets. We found deterministic algorithms like Projection and Oligo/Dyad had the highest prediction accuracy. Computational efficiency was not linearly related to dataset size and becomes critical: some algorithms are intractably slow on large datasets. This work provides the first combined assessment of the CPU, memory, and prediction accuracies of pattern discovery algorithms on real experimental datasets. HL60-Mnt-ChIP: ChIP-Chip with 10 biological replicates HL60-Trrap-ChIP: ChIP-Chip with 13 biological replicates

2010-05-19 | E-GEOD-15370 | biostudies-arrayexpress

RNA-seq of definitive endoderm differentiation of human embryonic stem cells in early G1 phase of the cell cycle

Project description:The experiment was designed to investigate transcriptional dynamics during definitive endoderm differentiation of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in early G1 phase of the cell cycle. For this, the FUCCI system was used to sort hESCs in Early G1 (EG1). Samples were taken at 0h (hESCs), 12h, 24h, 36h, 48h, 60h and 72h in triplicates. Total RNA was extracted using the GenElute Mammalian Total RNA Miniprep Kit (Sigma-Aldrich) and residual genomic DNA was removed using the On-Column DNase I Digestion Set (Sigma-Aldrich) following manufacturer’s instructions. The libraries were generated at a library fragment size between 100 bp to 1 kb with Stranded RNAseq Standard with Oligo dT pulldown. All samples were amplified with a standard 10 PCR cycle before sequencing. The samples were multiplexed and analysed by Illumina Hiseq V4 with a paired end read-length PE75. RNA-seq data analysis was performed following recommendations described in Conesa et al. (DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-0881-8).

2020-09-07 | E-MTAB-9194 | biostudies-arrayexpress

A systematic evaluation of pattern discovery algorithms

2009-11-24 | GSE15370 | GEO