Project description:1- Comparison of the transcriptome of two ecotypes (Col0 and Ler0): compare the transcriptome of ColO versus Ler0 for different tissues and developmental stages (seedlings 7 days, shoot 14 days, flowers, leafs 35 days)<br> 2- Impact of SINE RNA : Analyse the consequence of the expression of a SINE RNA in Arabidopsis thaliana<br> 3- Impact of the gcn2 mutation : Impact of the gcn2 mutation on the Arabidopsis thaliana transcriptome. GCN2 is a kinase potentially regulated by the SINE non-coding RNA
Project description:To understand the role of GCN2 in regulating translation, we compared the polysome loading state and overall transcript level between Arabidopsis thaliana wild type (ecotype Landsberg erecta) and gcn2 (Genetrap line GT8359, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) seedlings with or without herbicide chlorosufuron treatment RNA was fractionated using sucrose gradients into polysomal and nonpolysomal RNAs. We also determined overall total transcript levels. We used Affymetrix ATH1 microarrays.
Project description:The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of autotetraploidy on gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana by comparing diploid versus tetraploid transcriptomes. In particular, this included the comparison of the transcriptome of different tetraploid A. thaliana ecotypes (Col-0 vs. Ler-0). The study was extended to address further aspects. One was the comparison of the transcriptomes in subsequent generations. This intended to obtain information on the genome wide stability of autotetraploid gene expression. Another line of work compared the transcriptomes of different diploid vs. tetraploid tissues. This aimed to investigate whether particular gene groups are specifically affected during the development of A. thaliana autotetraploids. Samples 1-8: Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 tetraploid transcriptome. Transcriptional profiling and comparison of diploid vs. tetraploid Col-0 seedlings. The experiment was carried out with pedigree of independently generated and assessed tetraploid Col-0 lines. Samples 9-12: Arabidopsis thaliana Ler-0 tetraploid transcriptome. Transcriptional profiling and comparison of diploid vs. tetraploid Ler-0 seedlings. The experiment was carried out with pedigree of independently generated and assessed tetraploid Ler-0 lines. Samples 13-24: Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 tetraploid transcriptome. Transcriptional profiling and comparison of diploid vs. tetraploid Col-0 leaves (6th - 8th). The experiment was carried out with pedigree of independently generated and assessed tetraploid Col-0 lines. Samples 25-32: Arabidopsis thaliana Ler-0 tetraploid transcriptome. Transcriptional profiling and comparison of diploid vs. tetraploid Ler-0 leaves (6th - 8th). The experiment was carried out with pedigree of independently generated and assessed tetraploid Ler-0 lines. Samples 33-36: Arabidopsis thaliana Ler-0 tetraploid transcriptome. Transcriptional profiling and comparison of tetraploid vs. tetraploid Ler-0 seedlings from the second (F2) and third (F3) generation after induction, respectively. The experiment was carried out with pedigree of independently generated and assessed tetraploid Ler-0 lines. Samples 37-40: Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 tetraploid transcriptome. Transcriptional profiling and comparison of tetraploid vs. tetraploid Col-0 seedlings from the second (F2) and third (F3) generation after induction, respectively. The experiment was carried out with pedigree of independently generated and assessed tetraploid Col-0 lines. Samples 41-44: Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0/Ler-0 diploid transcriptome. Transcriptional profiling and comparison of diploid Col-0 vs. diploid Ler-0 seedlings. The experiment was carried out with pedigree of esrablished lines. Samples 45-48: Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0/Ler-0 tetraploid transcriptome. Transcriptional profiling and comparison of tetraploid Col-0 vs tetraploid Ler-0 seedlings. The experiment was carried out with pedigree of independently generated and assessed tetraploid Col-0 and Ler-0 lines.
Project description:To understand the role of GCN2 in stress response, the total transcript and translation state were compared between Arabidopsis thaliana wild type (ecotype Landsberg erecta) and gcn2 (Genetrap line GT8359, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) seedlings with or without herbicide chlorosufuron treatment RNA was fractionated using sucrose gradients into polysomal and nonpolysomal RNAs. We also determined overall total transcript levels. We used Affymetrix ATH1 microarrays.
Project description:Transcriptional profiling of Arabidopsis thaliana Ler wildtype and eid3 (empfindlicher im dunkelroten Licht 3) mutant seedlings in darkness and 45 min after a red-light pulse.
Project description:Transcriptional profiling of Arabidopsis wild-type (Col0) control seedlings with corresponding mutant seedlings is performed using Aligent's Whole Arabidopsis Gene Expression Microarray (G2519F, V4, 4x44K).
Project description:Transcriptional profiling of Arabidopsis wild-type (Col0) control flower buds or seedlings with corresponding mutant flower buds or seedlings is performed using Aligent's Whole Arabidopsis Gene Expression Microarray (G2519F, V4, 4x44K).
Project description:General translational repression is predicted as a key process to reduce energy consumption under hypoxia. We have previously showed that mRNA loading onto polysome is reduced in Arabidopsis under submergence. Here, we showed that plant stress activated GCN2 (general control nonderepressible 2) can phosphorylate eIF2a (Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 2a) in Arabidopsis under submergence, and this process is reversible after desubmergence. Compared to the wild-type, the reduction in polysome loading during submergence was less severe in the gcn2 mutant. Transgenic lines overexpressing GCN2 had more ATP and conferred better tolerance under submergence, suggesting that GCN2 might modulate the dynamics of translation to adjust the energy homeostasis under hypoxia. Interestingly, GCN2-eIF2a signaling was activated by ethylene under submergence. However, GCN2 activity was not affected in ein2-5 and eil1ein3 under submergence, suggesting that GCN2 activity was regulated by noncanonical ethylene signaling. In addition, the polysome loading was retained in both ein2-5 and etr1-1 under submergence, implying that ethylene modulated the dynamic translation under submergence via EIN2 and GCN2. Notably, our NGS analysis also demonstrated that EIN2 and GCN2 regulated the translation of 23 core hypoxia genes as well as 53% translational repressed genes under submergence. On the other hand, EIN2 and GCN2 also affected the expression of genes involved in hypoxic response, ethylene response, biotic stress and negative regulation of cytokinin signaling. Taken together, these demonstrated that entrapped ethylene triggers GCN2 and EIN2 to ensure the translation of stress required proteins under submergence and also provide a step stone for future investigation how eukaryotic cells modulate the translation to response for the changeable environments.
Project description:Transcriptional profiling of Arabidopsis embryos comparing cuc1-1 cuc2-1 mutant (test) and wild type Ler (reference). Goal was to screen genes regulated by CUC1 and CUC2 transcription factors, which are required for shoot meristem formation and cotyledon separation.