Gene expression associated with gemcitabine resistance and its reversal by bexarotene
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE6914 | GEO | 2007/01/31
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA98533
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Acquired drug resistance represents a major challenge in chemo-therapy treatment for various types of cancers. We have found that the retinoid X receptorâselective agonist bexarotene (LGD1069, Targretin) was efficacious in treating chemo-resistant cancer cells. The goal of this microarray study was to understand the mechanism of bexaroteneâs role in overcoming acquired drug resistance using human breast cancer cells MDA-MB-231 as a model system and paclitaxel as model compound. After MDA-MB-231 cells were repeatedly treated with paclitaxel for 8 cycles with each cycle including a 3-day treatment with 30 nM paclitaxel and followed by a 7-day exposure to control medium, MDA cells resistant to paclitaxel were developed and their growth was no longer inhibited by paclitaxel treatment. Those MDA cells with acquired drug resistance, when treated with paclitaxel and bexarotene in combination, could regain their sensitivity and their growth were again inhibited. Therefore, RNA samples from parental MDA-MB-231 cells, paclitaxel-resistant MDA cells treated with vehicle, paclitaxel alone or in combination with bexarotene, were used for perform global gene expression profiling with Affymetrix HG-U133A gene chips. Keywords: Drug Treatment MDA-MB-231 cells were exposed to regimens on a 10-day cycle: a 3-day treatment with 30 nM paclitaxel and followed by a 7-day exposure to control medium. Paclitaxel resistant MDA-MB-231 cells (MDA-PR) were established within 8 cycles of such treatment (80 days). These MDA-PR cells were then treated with vehicle control, paclitaxel along, or the combination of 30 nM paclitaxel ( 3 days on and 7 days off) and 1 µM Targretin (10 days on) in a new 10-day cycle for 3 months. Thus, there are four treatment groups, parent MDA cells, MDA-PR, MDA-PR treated with paclitaxel, MDA-PR treated with paclitaxel and bexarotene, and each group had four biological replicates.
2011-07-18 | E-GEOD-12791 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Acquired drug resistance represents a major challenge in chemo-therapy treatment for various types of cancers. We have found that the retinoid X receptor–selective agonist bexarotene (LGD1069, Targretin) was efficacious in treating chemo-resistant cancer cells. The goal of this microarray study was to understand the mechanism of bexarotene’s role in overcoming acquired drug resistance using human breast cancer cells MDA-MB-231 as a model system and paclitaxel as model compound. After MDA-MB-231 cells were repeatedly treated with paclitaxel for 8 cycles with each cycle including a 3-day treatment with 30 nM paclitaxel and followed by a 7-day exposure to control medium, MDA cells resistant to paclitaxel were developed and their growth was no longer inhibited by paclitaxel treatment. Those MDA cells with acquired drug resistance, when treated with paclitaxel and bexarotene in combination, could regain their sensitivity and their growth were again inhibited. Therefore, RNA samples from parental MDA-MB-231 cells, paclitaxel-resistant MDA cells treated with vehicle, paclitaxel alone or in combination with bexarotene, were used for perform global gene expression profiling with Affymetrix HG-U133A gene chips. Keywords: Drug Treatment
2011-07-19 | GSE12791 | GEO
Project description:Zhu2015 - combined gemcitabine and birinapant
in pancreatic cancer cells - mechanistic PD model
Mechanistic mathematical model to
illustrate the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy involving
gemcitabine and birinapant against pancreatic cancer.
This model is described in the article:
Mechanism-based mathematical
modeling of combined gemcitabine and birinapant in pancreatic
cancer cells.
Zhu X, Straubinger RM, Jusko
WJ.
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2015 Oct;
42(5): 477-496
Abstract:
Combination chemotherapy is standard treatment for
pancreatic cancer. However, current drugs lack efficacy for
most patients, and selection and evaluation of new combination
regimens is empirical and time-consuming. The efficacy of
gemcitabine, a standard-of-care agent, combined with
birinapant, a pro-apoptotic antagonist of Inhibitor of
Apoptosis Proteins (IAPs), was investigated in pancreatic
cancer cells. PANC-1 cells were treated with vehicle,
gemcitabine (6, 10, 20 nM), birinapant (50, 200, 500 nM), and
combinations of the two drugs. Temporal changes in cell
numbers, cell cycle distribution, and apoptosis were measured.
A basic pharmacodynamic (PD) model based on cell numbers, and a
mechanism-based PD model integrating all measurements, were
developed. The basic PD model indicated that synergistic
effects occurred in both cell proliferation and death
processes. The mechanism-based model captured key features of
drug action: temporary cell cycle arrest in S phase induced by
gemcitabine alone, apoptosis induced by birinapant alone, and
prolonged cell cycle arrest and enhanced apoptosis induced by
the combination. A drug interaction term Ψ was employed in
the models to signify interactions of the combination when data
were limited. When more experimental information was utilized,
Ψ values approaching 1 indicated that specific mechanisms
of interactions were captured better. PD modeling identified
the potential benefit of combining gemcitabine and birinapant,
and characterized the key interaction pathways. An optimal
treatment schedule of pretreatment with gemcitabine for 24-48 h
was suggested based on model predictions and was verified
experimentally. This approach provides a generalizable modeling
platform for exploring combinations of cytostatic and cytotoxic
agents in cancer cell culture studies.
This model is hosted on
BioModels Database
and identified by:
BIOMD0000000669.
To cite BioModels Database, please use:
Chelliah V et al. BioModels: ten-year
anniversary. Nucl. Acids Res. 2015, 43(Database
issue):D542-8.
To the extent possible under law, all copyright and related or
neighbouring rights to this encoded model have been dedicated to
the public domain worldwide. Please refer to
CC0
Public Domain Dedication for more information.
2024-09-02 | BIOMD0000000669 | BioModels
Project description:Zhu2015 - Combined gemcitabine and birinapant
in pancreatic cancer cells - basic PD model
Mathematical model to illustrate the
effectiveness of combination chemotherapy involving gemcitabine and
birinapant against pancreatic cancer.
This model is described in the article:
Mechanism-based mathematical
modeling of combined gemcitabine and birinapant in pancreatic
cancer cells.
Zhu X, Straubinger RM, Jusko
WJ.
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2015 Oct;
42(5): 477-496
Abstract:
Combination chemotherapy is standard treatment for
pancreatic cancer. However, current drugs lack efficacy for
most patients, and selection and evaluation of new combination
regimens is empirical and time-consuming. The efficacy of
gemcitabine, a standard-of-care agent, combined with
birinapant, a pro-apoptotic antagonist of Inhibitor of
Apoptosis Proteins (IAPs), was investigated in pancreatic
cancer cells. PANC-1 cells were treated with vehicle,
gemcitabine (6, 10, 20 nM), birinapant (50, 200, 500 nM), and
combinations of the two drugs. Temporal changes in cell
numbers, cell cycle distribution, and apoptosis were measured.
A basic pharmacodynamic (PD) model based on cell numbers, and a
mechanism-based PD model integrating all measurements, were
developed. The basic PD model indicated that synergistic
effects occurred in both cell proliferation and death
processes. The mechanism-based model captured key features of
drug action: temporary cell cycle arrest in S phase induced by
gemcitabine alone, apoptosis induced by birinapant alone, and
prolonged cell cycle arrest and enhanced apoptosis induced by
the combination. A drug interaction term Ψ was employed in
the models to signify interactions of the combination when data
were limited. When more experimental information was utilized,
Ψ values approaching 1 indicated that specific mechanisms
of interactions were captured better. PD modeling identified
the potential benefit of combining gemcitabine and birinapant,
and characterized the key interaction pathways. An optimal
treatment schedule of pretreatment with gemcitabine for 24-48 h
was suggested based on model predictions and was verified
experimentally. This approach provides a generalizable modeling
platform for exploring combinations of cytostatic and cytotoxic
agents in cancer cell culture studies.
This model is hosted on
BioModels Database
and identified by:
BIOMD0000000668.
To cite BioModels Database, please use:
Chelliah V et al. BioModels: ten-year
anniversary. Nucl. Acids Res. 2015, 43(Database
issue):D542-8.
To the extent possible under law, all copyright and related or
neighbouring rights to this encoded model have been dedicated to
the public domain worldwide. Please refer to
CC0
Public Domain Dedication for more information.
2024-09-02 | BIOMD0000000668 | BioModels
Project description:Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive malignant brain tumor. Differentiation can attenuate or block tumor growth; thus, phenotypic screenings were performed to search for drugs inducing differentiational morphological changes in mesenchymal recurrent GBM, a temozolomide (TMZ)-resistant brain cancer. Bexarotene, a selective retinoid X receptor agonist, showed strong inhibition of neurospheroidal colony formation and migration of cultured GBM stem cells. Bexarotene decreased nestin expression and significantly increased GFAP expression. Gene expression changes by bexarotene and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), a well-known differentiation inducer, were compared. Both drugs largely altered the gene expression pattern into a tumor-ameliorating direction. These drugs increased the gene expression levels of Krüppel-like factor 9 (KLF9), regulator of G-protein signaling 4 (RGS4), growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), angiopoietin-like protein 4 (ANGPTL4), and lowered the level of chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4). Both drugs also induced a potential oncogene, transglutaminase 2 (TG2), but the fold-change induced by bexarotene was considerably lesser than that by ATRA. Consistently, the TG2 activity in GBM was elevated several folds by ATRA. Because TG2 upregulation is correlated with tumor transformation and resistance, it is important to control its overexpression. Bexarotene does not upregulate TG2 as much as ATRA, and bexarotene showed in vivo tumoricidal effects in a GBM xenograft mouse model. Thus, these findings strongly suggest that bexarotene is more beneficial than ATRA and should be considered as a differentiation therapeutic agent for mesenchymal GBM.
2014-12-31 | GSE61002 | GEO
Project description:Bexarotene is a specific RXR agonist that has been used for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). The mechanism of action is pleiotropic but impacts directly on CTCL cell proliferation, chemotaxis and apoptosis, and indirectly on lymphoma immunity. Bexarotene causes hypothyroidism in more than 90% of patients thus requiring the concomitant administration of levothyroxine. Hereon we investigated the consequence of levothyroxine administration to the antineoplastic effect of bexarotene in CTCL. We found that bexarotene induces transcriptional and biological changes in CTCL cells related to decreased cell proliferation and chemotaxis, as well as increased proliferation and interferon response. Although lack of levothyroxine supplementation during bexarotene treatment increased apoptosis and decreased cell proliferation of CTCL cells in vitro and in vivo, it also decreased the lymphoma immunity. Since levothyroxine activates both the ubiquitous TRA nuclear receptor and the more restricted integrin V3 membrane receptor that is overexpressed in CTCL cells, we investigated their role in bexarotene treatment. We demonstrated that genetic and pharmacologic inhibition of the integrin V3 receptors resulted in improved bexarotene-induced effects on apoptosis, cell proliferation and chemotaxis while maintaining the lymphoma immunity. Our results provide a mechanistic rationale for evaluating the addition of the integrin V3 inhibitor cilengitide to CTCL therapeutic regimens that are based on bexarotene and levothyroxine supplementation.
2018-12-31 | GSE119345 | GEO
Project description:Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that primarily affects the skin rich in hyaluronic acid（HA）. HA composes extracellular matrix in the dermis, which likely affects the development of CTCL but is poorly understood. Here, we show that low molecular weight HA (LMWHA) possibly exacerbates CTCL in mouse and human specimens, and bexarotene already being used in CTCL treatment can decrease HA production. Patients’ serum and skin sections showed higher HA expression than healthy controls. HA extracted from the skin of mice inoculated with tumors showed an increase in LMWHA. LMWHA increased lymphoma cell proliferation in vitro and accelerated tumor formation in mice in vivo. LMWHA also created a favorable environment for tumor cells by influencing fibroblasts, vascular endothelial cells, and tumor-associated macrophages. Together, increased HA, mainly LMW aids in CLCL progression by affecting tumor cells and microenvironment. Next, bexarotene treatment reduced the amount of total HA in murine tumor-inoculated skin and the supernatant of cultured normal human dermal fibroblasts (NHDFs) and HuT78 cells. Detailed in vitro assessments showed that bexarotene treatment decreased hyaluronic acid synthase (HAS) 1 and HAS2 expression in NHDFs and HAS1, HAS3, and CEMIP in HuT78. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay revealed bexarotene reduced retinoid X receptor-alpha binding to the HAS1 and HAS2 promoters in NHDFs. Bexarotene potentially exerts its anti-tumor effect by reducing HA through decreased expression of HA synthase. These findings provide us with new insights into the developmental process of CLCT and additional insight into bexarotene treatment.
2024-11-01 | GSE248641 | GEO
Project description:We analysed differences in gene expression upon treatment of MSD patient fibroblast lines and control fibroblast lines with tazarotene and bexarotene or DMSO control (untreated condition)
2022-10-31 | GSE205556 | GEO
Project description:CHK1 inhibition following gemcitabine treatment
| PRJNA262182 | ENA
Project description:PURPOSE: This tumor response pharmacodynamic model aims to describe primary lesion shrinkage in non-small cell lung cancer over time and determine if concentration-based exposure metrics for gemcitabine or that of its metabolites,n2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine or gemcitabine triphosphate, are better than gemcitabine dose for prediction of individual response. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Gemcitabine was given thrice weekly on days 1 and 8 in combination with carboplatin, which was given only on day 1 of every cycle. Gemcitabine amount in the body and area under the concentration-time curves of plasma gemcitabine, 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine, and intracellular gemcitabine triphosphate in white cells were compared to determine which best describes tumor shrinkage over time. Tumor growth kinetics were described using a Gompertz-like model.
RESULTS: The apparent half-life for the effect of gemcitabine was 7.67 weeks. The tumor turnover time constant was 21.8 week.cm. Baseline tumor size and gemcitabine amount in the body to attain 50% of tumor shrinkage were estimated to be 6.66 cm and 10,600 mg. There was no evidence of relapse during treatment.
2024-09-02 | BIOMD0000000234 | BioModels