Dataset Information

A comparison of DNA copy number profiling platforms using a panel of melanoma cell lines

ABSTRACT: The accurate mapping of recurring DNA copy number aberrations (CNAs), a hallmark feature of the cancer genome, has facilitated the discovery of tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes. Microarray-based assays designed to detect these chromosomal copy number alterations on a genome-wide and high-resolution scale have emerged as a cornerstone technology in the genomic era. The diversity of commercially-available platforms prompted a systematic comparison of five copy number profiling assays for their ability to detect 2-fold copy number gain and loss (4n or 1n, respectively) as well as focal high-amplitude CNAs. Here, using a collection of established human melanoma cell lines, we defined the reproducibility, absolute signals, signal:noise, false-positive and false-negative rates for each of the five assays against ground-truth defined by Spectral Karyotyping (SKY), in addition to comparing the concordance of CNAs detection by two high-resolution Agilent and Affymetrix microarray platforms. Our analyses concluded that the Agilent’s 60mer oligo-microarray with probe design optimized for genomic hybridization offers the highest sensitivity and specificity [area under Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve >0.99] while Affymetrix’s SNP microarray appears to offer better detection of CNAs in gene-poor region. Availability of these comparison results should guide study design decisions and facilitate further computational development. Keywords: comparative genomic hybridization

ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens

PROVIDER: GSE7822 | GEO | 2007/11/02

SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA100055

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Project description:The accurate mapping of recurring DNA copy number aberrations (CNAs), a hallmark feature of the cancer genome, has facilitated the discovery of tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes. Microarray-based assays designed to detect these chromosomal copy number alterations on a genome-wide and high-resolution scale have emerged as a cornerstone technology in the genomic era. The diversity of commercially-available platforms prompted a systematic comparison of five copy number profiling assays for their ability to detect 2-fold copy number gain and loss (4n or 1n, respectively) as well as focal high-amplitude CNAs. Here, using a collection of established human melanoma cell lines, we defined the reproducibility, absolute signals, signal:noise, false-positive and false-negative rates for each of the five assays against ground-truth defined by Spectral Karyotyping (SKY), in addition to comparing the concordance of CNAs detection by two high-resolution Agilent and Affymetrix microarray platforms. Our analyses concluded that the Agilentâs 60mer oligo-microarray with probe design optimized for genomic hybridization offers the highest sensitivity and specificity [area under Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve >0.99] while Affymetrixâs SNP microarray appears to offer better detection of CNAs in gene-poor region. Availability of these comparison results should guide study design decisions and facilitate further computational development. Keywords: comparative genomic hybridization We generated copy number profiles of a defined set of tumor cell lines on five oligo-microarray-based assays of three platforms (Agilent, Affymetrix and NimbleGen) and determined the reproducibility, signal and noise as well as sensitivity and specificity of each in detecting two-fold signals based on SKY-defined aberrations as ground-truth for comparison. In addition, high-density microarray assays from Agilent and Affymetrix platforms were further compared for definition of CNAs in an independent dataset using published analytical approaches. All arrays were run from the same DNA harvest from respective cell lines. Each array was run according to the protocol of the manufacturer.

Project description:We analysed, by last-generation high-resolution SNP arrays, Normal Karyotype (NK)-AML patients at diagnosis (Dx) and remission (R) phases, in order to determine the number of tumor-associated copy number abnormalities (CNAs) and copy neutral-loss of heterozygosity (CN-LOH) regions per patient and to identify possible recurring genomic abnormalities. The number of tumor-associated CNAs was detemined after comparison of 11 matched Dx/R samples using stringent conditions able to reduce the number of false positive CNAs. 8 additional unmatched Dx samples were included in the analysis of recurring CNAs and for detection of broad CN-LOH segments. With the exception of a single outlier case, a low number of CNAs per patient was detected (median value of 1 somatic loss or gain per patient). However, a high prevalence of CNAs (60-70% of the patients showed at least 1 tumor-associated gain or loss) and few recurring CNAs were observed, thus providing new hints towards identification of cooperating mutations. An extensive search of all CN-LOH regions > 1 Mb revealed only 3 broad regions (terminal 12Mb of 22q, terminal 27Mb of 1p and the whole chromosome 21) in three patients out of 19 (16%). CN-LOH of the whole chromosome 21 was responsible for homozygosity of a missense mutation (R80C) of RUNX1/AML1. Our study suggests that a relative submicroscopic copy number stability NK-AML genomes is associated with low recurrence of specific CNAs and CN-LOH in NK-AML patient population. Nineteen AML bone marrow samples were collected at the time of diagnosis (>90% blasts), defined as karyotypically-normal on the basis of standard metaphase cytogenetics (MC) and analysed by the Affymetrix SNP 6.0 arrays. In 11 of such cases (matched Dx) we obtained a bone marrow sample at the remission phase (matched R) of comparable high quality as evaluated by Contrast QC and MAPD values. In 8 cases (unmatched Dx) the corresponding R sample was not available or was not of comparable quality. As a reference set the publicly available data from 270 HapMap individuals were used.

Dataset Information

A comparison of DNA copy number profiling platforms using a panel of melanoma cell lines

Dataset's files

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets