PD-L1 expression and immune escape in melanoma resistance to MAPK inhibitors
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE99898 | GEO | 2017/07/01
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA389975
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Disrupting PD-1/PD-L1 interaction rejuvenates antitumor immunity. Clinical successes by blocking PD-1/PD-L1 binding have grown across wide-ranging cancer histologies, but innate therapy resistance is evident in the majority of treated patients1. Cancer cells can express robust surface levels of PD-L1 to tolerize tumor-specific T cells, but regulation of PD-L1 protein levels in the cancer cell is poorly understood. Quasi-mesenchymal tumor cells up-regulate PD-L1/L2 and induce an immune-suppressive microenvironment, including expansion of M2-like macrophages and regulatory T cells and exclusion of CD8+ T-cell infiltration2. Targeted therapy, including MAPK inhibitor therapy in melanoma, leads to quasi-mesenchymal transitions and resistance3, and both MAPK inhibitor treatment and mesenchymal signatures are associated with innate anti-PD-1 resistance4,5. Here we identify ITCH as an E3 ligase that downregulates tumor cell-surface PD-L1/L2 in PD-L1/L2-high cancer cells, including MAPK inhibitor-resistant melanoma, and suppresses acquired MAPK inhibitor resistance in and only in immune-competent mice. ITCH interacts with and poly-ubiquitinates PD-L1/L2, and ITCH deficiency increases cell-surface PD-L1/L2 expression and reduces T cell activation. Mouse melanoma tumors grow faster with Itch knockdown only in syngeneic hosts but not in immune-deficient mice. MAPK inhibitor therapy induces tumor cell-surface PD-L1 expression in murine melanoma, recapitulating the responses of clinical melanoma3, and this induction is more robust with Itch knockdown. Notably, suppression of ITCH expression first elicits a shift toward an immune-suppressive microenvironment and then accelerates resistance development. These findings collectively identify ITCH as a critical negative regulator of PD-L1 tumor cell-surface expression and provide insights into previously unexplained role of PD-L1 in adaptive resistance to therapy.
2022-03-31 | MSV000089180 | MassIVE
Project description:Combining PD-L1 blockade with inhibition of oncogenic mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling may result in long-lasting responses in patients with advanced melanoma. This phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation and -expansion study (NCT02027961) investigated safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of durvalumab (anti–PD-L1) combined with dabrafenib (BRAF inhibitor) and trametinib (MEK inhibitor) for patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma (cohort A, n=26), or durvalumab and trametinib given concomitantly (cohort B, n=20) or sequentially (cohort C, n=22) for patients with BRAF-wild type melanoma. Adverse events and treatment discontinuation rates were more common than previously reported for these agents given as monotherapy. Objective responses were observed in 69.2% (cohort A), 20.0% (cohort B) and 31.8% (cohort C) of patients, with evidence of improved tumor immune infiltration and durable responses in a subset of patients with available biopsy samples. In conclusion, combined MAPK inhibition and anti–PD-L1 therapy may provide treatment options for patients with advanced melanoma.
2020-09-24 | GSE158403 | GEO
Project description:Multiple BRAF inhibitor resistance mechanisms have been described, however their relative frequency, clinical correlates, and effect on subsequent therapy have not been assessed in patients with metastatic melanoma. Excised progressing BRAFV600 mutant melanoma metastases (Prog) from patients treated with dabrafenib (n=22) or vemurafenib (n=8) were analyzed for known resistance mechanisms. Oncogenic signaling in Prog and matched pre-treatment tumors was examined using gene expression analysis. Resistance mechanisms were correlated with clinicopathologic features and outcome. A resistance mechanism was identified in 21/38 (55%) Prog samples from 30 patients; BRAF splice variants (n=12, 32%), N-RAS mutations (n=3, 8%), BRAF amplification (n=3, 8%), MEK1/2 mutations (n=3, 8%) and an AKT1 mutation (n=1, 3%). Four Progs tumours displayed multiple resistance mechanisms, and four patients with multiple Progs demonstrated inter-tumoral heterogeneity of resistance mechanisms. Six (21%) of 29 Progs showed loss of MAPK activity by gene expression analysis. These MAPK-inhibited Progs had unknown resistance mechanisms, and these patients had a shorter progression-free survival than patients with MAPK re-activated Progs. There were no responses to subsequent targeted therapy, even when the identified mechanism of resistance was predicted to be responsive. Heterogeneity of resistance mechanisms was common between patients, within patients and within individual tumors. The MAPK pathway remained inhibited in a subset of resistant tumors with unknown mechanisms of resistance, and the outcomes of patients with these tumors are poor. The use of sequential targeted therapies based on the molecular characteristics of a single progressing biopsy is unlikely to provide improved clinical outcomes. Total RNA was obtained from fresh-frozen melanoma tumour samples from patients before commencing treatment with dabrafenib or vemurafenib and at time of tumour progression.
2014-02-19 | E-GEOD-50509 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:<p>Desmoplastic melanoma (DM) is a rare subtype of melanoma characterized by dense fibrous stroma, resistance to chemotherapy and a lack of actionable driver mutations, but is highly associated with ultraviolet light DNA damage. We analysed 60 patients with advanced DM treated with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) blocking antibody therapy. Objective tumor responses were observed in 42 of the 60 patients (70%, 95% confidence interval 57-81%), including 19 patients (32% overall) with a complete response. Whole-exome sequencing revealed a high mutational load and frequent NF-1 mutations (14 out of 17 cases). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis from 19 DM and 13 non-DM revealed a higher percentage of PD-L1 positive cells in the tumor parenchyma in DM (p = 0.04), highly associated with increased CD8 density and PD-L1 expression in the tumor invasive margin. Therefore, patients with advanced DM derive significant clinical benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade therapy despite being a cancer defined by its dense desmoplastic fibrous stroma. The benefit is likely derived from the high mutational burden and a frequent pre-existing adaptive immune response limited by PD-L1 expression.</p>
| phs001469 | dbGaP
Project description:Multiple BRAF inhibitor resistance mechanisms have been described, however their relative frequency, clinical correlates, and effect on subsequent therapy have not been assessed in patients with metastatic melanoma. Excised progressing BRAFV600 mutant melanoma metastases (Prog) from patients treated with dabrafenib (n=22) or vemurafenib (n=8) were analyzed for known resistance mechanisms. Oncogenic signaling in Prog and matched pre-treatment tumors was examined using gene expression analysis. Resistance mechanisms were correlated with clinicopathologic features and outcome. A resistance mechanism was identified in 21/38 (55%) Prog samples from 30 patients; BRAF splice variants (n=12, 32%), N-RAS mutations (n=3, 8%), BRAF amplification (n=3, 8%), MEK1/2 mutations (n=3, 8%) and an AKT1 mutation (n=1, 3%). Four Progs tumours displayed multiple resistance mechanisms, and four patients with multiple Progs demonstrated inter-tumoral heterogeneity of resistance mechanisms. Six (21%) of 29 Progs showed loss of MAPK activity by gene expression analysis. These MAPK-inhibited Progs had unknown resistance mechanisms, and these patients had a shorter progression-free survival than patients with MAPK re-activated Progs. There were no responses to subsequent targeted therapy, even when the identified mechanism of resistance was predicted to be responsive. Heterogeneity of resistance mechanisms was common between patients, within patients and within individual tumors. The MAPK pathway remained inhibited in a subset of resistant tumors with unknown mechanisms of resistance, and the outcomes of patients with these tumors are poor. The use of sequential targeted therapies based on the molecular characteristics of a single progressing biopsy is unlikely to provide improved clinical outcomes.
2014-02-19 | GSE50509 | GEO
Project description:Indications of PD-1/L1- and MAPK-targeted therapies cross cancer histologies. Rationally sequencing and/or combining them may overcome innate and acquired resistance. We observed increased clinical benefit of BRAF andV600MUT/MEK inhibitors in patients with advanced BRAFV600MUT melanoma who were previously treated with immune checkpoint therapy (ICT). To test whether ICT primes MAPK inhibitor (MAPKi) efficacy, we compared sequential/combinatorial regimens in subcutaneous mouse tumors driven by BrafV600, Nras, Nf1 or Kras mutations. The most efficacious regimen consisted of anti-PD-L1 lead-in preceding MAPKi combination and specifically promoted intratumoral pro-inflammatory macrophages and clonal expansion of IFNhi, CD8+ cytotoxic T-cells (relative to CD4+ regulatory T-cells) that highly expressed activation and cytolytic genes. Since melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) and its propensity for therapeutic resistance limit patient survival, we developed an experimental metastasis model of BrafV600MUT MBM. Sequencing anti-PD-L1 before MAPKi combination resulted in superior MBM control and survival as well as robust intratumoral T-cell clonal expansion both intracranially and extracranially. We propose that brief anti-PD-1/L1 dosing prior to MAPKi co-treatment suppresses resistance.
2021-08-19 | GSE177901 | GEO
Project description:Indications of PD-1/L1- and MAPK-targeted therapies cross cancer histologies. Rationally sequencing and/or combining them may overcome innate and acquired resistance. We observed increased clinical benefit of BRAF andV600MUT/MEK inhibitors in patients with advanced BRAFV600MUT melanoma who were previously treated with immune checkpoint therapy (ICT). To test whether ICT primes MAPK inhibitor (MAPKi) efficacy, we compared sequential/combinatorial regimens in subcutaneous mouse tumors driven by BrafV600, Nras, Nf1 or Kras mutations. The most efficacious regimen consisted of anti-PD-L1 lead-in preceding MAPKi combination and specifically promoted intratumoral pro-inflammatory macrophages and clonal expansion of IFNhi, CD8+ cytotoxic T-cells (relative to CD4+ regulatory T-cells) that highly expressed activation and cytolytic genes. Since melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) and its propensity for therapeutic resistance limit patient survival, we developed an experimental metastasis model of BrafV600MUT MBM. Sequencing anti-PD-L1 before MAPKi combination resulted in superior MBM control and survival as well as robust intratumoral T-cell clonal expansion both intracranially and extracranially. We propose that brief anti-PD-1/L1 dosing prior to MAPKi co-treatment suppresses resistance.
2021-08-19 | GSE177900 | GEO
Project description:<p>Mechanisms of acquired resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether alterations in genes encoding components of the HLA Class I antigen processing and presentation machinery or interferon signaling pathways play a role in acquired resistance to PD-1 or PD-L1 antagonistic antibodies. Whole exome sequencing was performed on tumor samples collected from patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer at the time of resistance to PD-1 axis inhibitors and on available matched pre-treatment and normal samples. Patient-derived xenografts successfully established from the ICI-resistant samples were also exome sequenced. Additionally, RNA sequencing was performed on cases with sufficient tissue.</p>
| phs001464 | dbGaP
Project description:The first clinical trial testing the combination of targeted therapy with a BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib and immunotherapy with a CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab was terminated early due to significant liver toxicities, possibly due to paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway by BRAF inhibitors in tumors with wild type BRAF. MEK inhibitors can potentiate the MAPK inhibition in tumor, while potentially alleviating the unwanted paradoxical MAPK activation. With a mouse model of syngeneic BRAFV600E driven melanoma (SM1), we tested whether the addition of the MEK inhibitor trametinib would enhance the immunosensitization effects of the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib. Combination of dabrafenib and trametinib with pmel-1 adoptive cell transfer (ACT) showed complete tumor regression. Bioluminescent imaging and tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) phenotyping showed increased effector infiltration to tumors with dabrafenib, trametinib or dabrafenib plus trametinib with pmel-1 ACT combination. Intracellular IFN gamma staining of the TILs and in vivo cytotoxicity studies showed trametinib was not detrimental to the effector functions in vivo. Dabrafenib increased tumor associated macrophages and T regulatory cells (Tregs) in the tumors, which can be overcome by addition of trametinib. Microarray analysis revealed increased melanoma antigen, MHC expression, and global immune-related gene upregulation with the triple combination therapy. Given the up-regulation of PD-L1 seen with dabrafenib and/or trametinib combined with antigen specific ACT, we tested the triple combination of dabrafenib, trametinib with anti-PD1 therapy, and observed superior anti-tumor effect to SM1 tumors. Our findings support the testing of these combinations in patients with BRAFV600E mutant metastatic melanoma. SM1 tumors were implanted into C57BL/6 mice. Mice were treated by ACT of pmel-1 splenocytes or C57BL/6 splenocytes as control. Pmel-1 treated mice were additionally treated with either vehicle, dabrafenib, trametinib, or combination of both drugs and control mice were treated with vehicle or combination of both drugs.
2014-12-12 | E-GEOD-64102 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Background: We examined changes in the tumor immune microenvironment during neoadjuvant chemotherapy by comparing immune gene mRNA expression, tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) count and PD-L1 protein expression in pre- and post-treatment tissues. Methods: Paired pre- and post- treatment tumor samples from 60 patients were profiled using the Nanostring Immune Oncology 360 platform to measure the expression of 770 immune-related genes that also allowed us to test 14 immune cell type and 27 previously published prognostic and immuno therapy response predictive gene signatures. All samples were also assessed for TIL counts and PD-L1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry. Gene expression levels were compared by paired t-test with Bonferroni correction. TIL count, PD-L1 protein expression and immune gene signatures were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Baseline immune markers were correlated with pathologic complete response (pCR) using estrogen receptor (ER) and treatment adjusted logistic regression. Results: TIL counts were significantly lower in post- compared to pre-treatment samples (17% vs 7%, p=0.013) but stromal PD-L1 protein expression was not significantly different. At baseline, higher TIL count and PD-L1 expression were associated with pCR. High expression of a mast cell metagene was associated with residual disease (RD). No individual genes or VEGF gene signature were associated with benefit from bevacizumab. In patients with RD (n=31), genes involved with tissue repair and inflammation (DUSP1, EGR1, IL6, ATF3, CD36, CXCL2, CD69, NGFR, KLF2, THBD, DAB2) showed significantly higher expression after therapy while most other immune markers decreased. The T effector, T-reg, MHC-I, MHC-II, IFNgamma, STAT-1 and M1 macrophage gene signatures were all significantly lower in post- versus pre-treatment samples and only the IL8/VEGFR and T-helper gene signatures showed higher expression after therapy. Conclusions: High mast cell gene expression is associated with lower pCR rate. TIL counts and most immune parameters decrease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
2019-02-01 | GSE114403 | GEO