Dataset Information

Chesneau_et_al_MetaFlowTrain_Exometabolites

ABSTRACT: Bacterial and fungal exometabolites were harvested from the MetaFlowTrain system, where bacteria and fungi were cultivated in various peat washes. Two milliliters of exometabolites were collected from the MetaFlowTrain output at two distinct time points: 24 hours and 62 hours. These exometabolites were subsequently extracted (for detailed methods, refer to the associated publication). Data Overview: 221208 Folders: Data were used to create Figures 3 and 4 and were acquired in Full-MS/ddMS2 (Top10). 230530 Folders: Data contributed to Figure 2 and were acquired in Full-MS. File Naming Convention: Sample number_Microbial inoculum in the first chamber_Microbial inoculum in the second chamber_Peat wash used For example, 01_F_B_Peat1 refers to sample 1, fungi in the first chamber, bacteria in the second chamber, and peat wash 1. Abbreviations: F: Fungi, B: Bacteria, X: Mock Additional Files: TraceFinder Raw Tables These tables are provided for the four files (221208_Guillaume_Chambers_AA, 221208_Guillaume_Chambers_TCA&Gly, 230530_Guillaume_Chambers, 230530_Guillaume_Chambers_AA) and include key parameters for all samples, pools, and standards: - Retention Time (Actual RT) - Accurate Mass Measurements (m/z Apex / m/z Delta) - Ion Abundance (Area) - Ion Height (Height) Summary Table (Level 1 identification): A summary table is also included, detailing targeted retention times for all metabolites and the spectra for the TCA&Gly identification: - RT Sample Average: The average retention time for samples in the set. - RT Sample %RSD: The percentage relative standard deviation (%RSD) of sample retention times, indicating variability. - RT Pool Average: The average retention time for pooled samples. - RT Pool %RSD: The %RSD for pooled samples, showing variability. - RT Std Average: The average retention time for standard samples. - RT Std %RSD: The %RSD for standard retention times. - RT Difference Pool-Std: The difference in retention times between pooled and standard samples.

INSTRUMENT(S): QExactive

ORGANISM(S): Communities Of Bacterial And Fungal Strains

SUBMITTER: Guillaume Chesneau

PROVIDER: MSV000096804 | MassIVE | Wed Jan 08 09:24:00 GMT 2025

REPOSITORIES: MassIVE

ACCESS DATA

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Project description:One µg of total RNA from either an individual rat or from a pooled sample was amplified and labeled with a fluorescent dye (either Cy3 or Cy5) using the Low RNA Input Linear Amplification Labeling kit (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The amount and quality of the resulting fluorescently labeled cRNA was assessed using a Nanodrop ND-100 spectrophometer and an Agilent Bioanalyzer. Equal amounts of Cy3- or Cy5-labeled cRNA were hybridized to the Agilent Rat Oligo Microarray (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) for 17 hrs, prior to washing and scanning. Data was extracted from the resulting images using Agilent’s Feature Extraction Software (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Palo Alto, CA). For day/night comparisons, two types of complementing hybridizations were performed: hepatic RNA from individual day rats was hybridized against a pool made up of RNA from 12 hour offset night rats, and RNA from individual night rats was hybridized against a pool made up of RNA from 12-hour offset day rats. Specifically, hepatic RNA samples from three individual day rats collected ten hours after light on (CT10) were hybridized against a pooled RNA sample composed of equal aliquots of RNA from the livers of six night rats collected ten hrs after lights off (CT22); and RNA samples from three individual night rats collected at CT22 were hybridized against a pooled RNA sample composed of equal aliquots of RNA from the livers of six day rats collected at CT10. This was replicated in a second study for a total of 24 hybridizations of 12 hour offset samples. For time of day comparisons, equal aliquots of RNA from the livers of six rats collected at each of four different times of the circadian day (CT4, CT10, C16 and CT22) were pooled. The two replicate studies thus resulted in 8 pools (two replicate pools/time point times four time points); each pool was hybridized against a Universal Rat Reference RNA Standard (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Keywords: time-course

Project description:Abstract: Crosslinking mass spectrometry (Crosslinking MS) has developed into a robust technique that is increasingly used to investigate the interactomes of organelles and cells. However, the incomplete and noisy information contained in spectra limits especially the identification of heteromeric protein-protein interactions (PPIs) from the many theoretically possible PPIs. We successfully leveraged here chromatographic retention time (RT) to complement the mass spectrometry-centric identification process. For this, we first made crosslinked peptides amenable to RT prediction, through a Siamese neural network, and then added RT information to the identification process. Our multi-task machine learning model xiRT achieved highly accurate predictions in a multi-dimensional separation experiment of crosslinked E. coli lysate conducted for this study. We combined strong cation exchange (SCX), hydrophilic strong anion exchange (hSAX) and reversed-phase (RP) chromatography and reached R^2 0.94 in RP and a margin of error of 1 fraction for hSAX in 94%, and SCX in 85% of the cases. Importantly, supplementing the search engine score with retention time features led to a 1.4-fold increase in PPIs, at 1% PPI false discovery rate (FDR). We also demonstrated the value of this approach for the more routine analysis of multiprotein complexes. In the Fanconi anaemia monoubiquitin ligase complex, an increase of 1.7-fold in heteromeric residue-pairs was achieved at 1% residue-pair FDR, solely using reversed-phase RT. Retention times therefore proved to be a powerful complement to mass spectrometric information to improve the identification of crosslinked peptides. We envision xiRT to supplement search engines in their scoring routines to increase the sensitivity of Crosslinking MS analyses especially for protein-protein interactions. Conclusion: Using a Siamese network architecture, we succeeded in bringing RT prediction into the Crosslinking MS field, independent of separation setup and search software. Our open source application xiRT introduces the concept of multi-task learning to achieve multi-dimensional chromatographic retention time prediction, and may use any peptide sequence-dependent measure including for example collision cross section or isoelectric point. The black-box character of the neural network was reduced by means of interpretable machine learning that revealed individual amino acid contributions towards the separation behavior. The RT predictions – even when using only the RP dimension – complement mass spectrometric information to enhance the identification of heteromeric crosslinks in multiprotein complex and proteome-wide studies. Overfitting does not account for this gain as known false target matches from an entrapment database did not increase. Leveraging additional information sources may help to address the mass-spectrometric identification challenge of heteromeric crosslinks.

Dataset Information

Chesneau_et_al_MetaFlowTrain_Exometabolites

Dataset's files

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets