Dataset Information

Comparative analysis of flavonoid metabolites from different parts of Hemerocallis citrina

ABSTRACT:

Hemerocallis citrina Baroni is a traditional medical and edible plant with various health benefits. Currently, many phytochemical analyses have been performed and various biological constituents have been extracted from H. citrina. Flavonoid compounds are a kind of important bioactive components. However, the comparison of flavonoid compounds and antioxidant potentials of different tissues of H. citrina is not clear. In this study, we identified flavonoid metabolites and investigated antioxidant activities of four tissues including roots, stems, leaves and flowers of H. citrina. A total of 364 flavonoid metabolites were identified by UPLC-MS/MS based metabolomics, and the four tissues showed dramatic differences at flavonoid metabolic level. Compared to H. citrina roots, 185, 234 and 119 flavonoid metabolites accounted for upregulated DFMs in stems, leaves and flowers, respectively. Compared to stems, 168 and 29 flavonoid metabolites accounted for upregulated DFMs in leaves and flowers, respectively. Compared to leaves, only 29 flavonoid metabolites accounted for upregulated DFMs in flowers. A number of 35 common flavonoid metabolites were observed among six comparison groups, and each comparison group had its unique differential metabolites. The most abundant flavonoid metabolites in the four tissues are flavonols and flavones, followed by flavanones, chalcones, flavanols, flavanonols, anthocyanidins, tannin and proanthocyanidins. The dominant DFMs in roots are 6,7,8-Tetrahydroxy-5-methoxyflavone, 7,8,3',4'-tetrahydroxyflavone, 1-Hydroxy-2,3,8-trimethoxyxanthone, Farrerol-7-O-glucoside, 3',7-dihydroxy-4'-methoxyflavone, 3,3'-O-Dimethylellagic Acid, 5-Hydroxy-6,7-dimethoxyflavone, Nepetin (5,7,3',4'-Tetrahydroxy-6-methoxyflavone), (2s)-4,8,10-trihydroxy-2-methoxy-1h,2h-furo[3,2-a]xanthen-11-one. The dominant DFMs in stems are Isorhamnetin-3-O-(6''-malonyl)glucoside-7-O-rhamnoside, 7-Benzyloxy-5-hydroxy-3',4'-methylenedioxyflavonoid, 3-Hydroxyphloretin-4'-O-glucoside. The dominant DFMs in leaves are Chrysoeriol-7-O-glucoside, Epicatechin glucoside, Kaempferol-3-O-rhamnoside (Afzelin)(Kaempferin)*, Azaleatin (5-O-Methylquercetin), Chrysoeriol-5-O-glucoside, Nepetin-7-O-glucoside(Nepitrin), 3,5,7,2'-Tetrahydroxyflavone; Datiscetin, Procyanidin B2*, Procyanidin B3*, Procyanidin B1, Isorhamnetin-3-O-(6''-acetylglucoside). The dominant DFMs in flowers are kaempferol-3-p-coumaroyldiglucoside, Delphinidin-3-O-sophoroside-5-O-glucoside, Limocitrin-3-O-sophoroside, Kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside(Nicotiflorin), Luteolin-7-O-(6''-malonyl)glucoside-5-O-rhamnoside. The total flavonoid contents (TFC) and antioxidant activities of different tissues were in the order of leaves>stems>flowers>roots. The positive correlation was shown between TFC and the antioxidant activity values obtained from DPPH, ABTS and FRAP assays. There was significant difference in flavonoid metabolites among different tissues of H. citrina. Leaves had higher metabolites and antioxidant capacity than other tissues. This study promoted comprehensive resource utilization of H. citrina and provided biological and chemical evidence for the different uses of various plant tissues.

INSTRUMENT(S): Liquid Chromatography MS - negative - reverse phase, Liquid Chromatography MS - positive - reverse phase

SUBMITTER: Hongrui Lv

PROVIDER: MTBLS7978 | MetaboLights | 2023-10-02

REPOSITORIES: MetaboLights

ACCESS DATA

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	MTBLS7978	Other
	FILES	Other
	a_MTBLS7978_LC-MS_negative_reverse-phase_metabolite_profiling.txt	Txt
	a_MTBLS7978_LC-MS_positive_reverse-phase_metabolite_profiling.txt	Txt
	i_Investigation.txt	Txt

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 7

Publications

Comparative analysis of flavonoid metabolites from different parts of Hemerocallis citrina.

Lv Hongrui H Guo Shang S

BMC plant biology 20231013 1

<h4>Background</h4>Hemerocallis citrina Baroni is a traditional medical and edible plant. It is rich in flavonoid compounds, which are a kind of important bioactive components with various health benefits and pharmaceutical value. However, the flavonoid metabolomics profile and the comparison of flavonoid compounds from different parts of H. citrina is scarce.<h4>Results</h4>In this study, flavonoid metabolites were investigated from roots, stems, leaves and flowers of H. citrina. A total of 364 ...[more]

PMID: 37828495

Similar Datasets

Project description:To facilitate the functional annotation of the pepper genome, we generated 90.84 Gb of RNA-Seq data from 33 libraries representing all major tissue types and developmental stages of Zunla 1, as well as fruits from other accessions with significant phenotypic differences. Pepper ‘Zunla 1’ and other inbred lines were grown in a greenhouse as described in Table S1, with their different developmental stages Plants at full-bloom stage were harvested for roots, stems, and leaves as the same as the samples for phased small RNAs (see text S3.4.2 for details). Mature plants were harvested for unopened flower buds (buds) and fully open flowers (flowers). Additional flowers were allowed to self-pollinate and fruit was harvested at four pre-breaker stages (1-3cm, 3-4cm, 4-5cm fruit length, and mature green), the breaker stage (when the fruit was turning red) and three post-breaker stages (3, 5, and 7 days after breaker). These samples will respectively be referred to as Root, Stem, Leaf, Bud, Flower, F-Dev-1, F-Dev-2, F-Dev-3, F-Dev-4, F-Dev-5, F-Dev-6, F-Dev-7, F-Dev-8, and F-Dev-9. Similar roots, stems, leaves, immature fruit and red fruit were harvested from other inbred lines from domesticated Capsicum species. Meanwhile, chiltepin plants were grown under long days at controlled temperature and RNA was extracted from a mix of leaves from four stages (seedling, early blooming, full bloom, and fruit breaker phases), a mix of flowers from unopened flower buds (buds) and fully open flowers (flowers), and fruit at breaker and breaker plus five days respectively. All tissues were frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at -80℃. Total RNA was isolated from different samples by using the Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Strand-specific RNA-Seq library preparations were performed as previously described (39) with 12 independently bar-coded samples sequenced on one lane of an Illumina HiSeq2000 system. The 200 bp paired-end libraries were sequenced using Illumina HiSeq 2000 (90 bp PE).